|
POST
|
Hello, Our organization is experiencing an issue when exporting layouts form Pro to a PDF. In some case the text color will change to black. Other times a symbol will change. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to resolve this issue. I am currently using ArcGIS Pro version 3.2.
... View more
01-09-2024
01:56 PM
|
0
|
7
|
3717
|
|
POST
|
Hello All, I have recently noticed that using the 'Split' command in version 3.0.x is causing historic lines when the 'Record' is active. This was not the case in version 2.9.x, is this a new update or a possible bug? For reference, which commands and/or tools are supposed to create historic lines (beside 'Set Historic' command)? Thank you, Chad
... View more
04-25-2023
06:32 AM
|
0
|
0
|
600
|
|
POST
|
Hello All, Is there a limit and/or threshold to the number of parcels (Created Parcel Count) that can be created from a particular 'Record?' In our organization we have 17 'Records' were the 'Created Parcel Count' > '100.' We two 'Records' were the 'Created Parcel Count' > '700.' For the latter two, I have noticed some odd behavior. 1. After shrinking the parcel to seed, I have noticed extended build times ('Build Active'). Builds can last up to and past 5 minutes. This is contrary to normal build times which are usually just a few seconds. 2. A subdivision 'Record' with a 'Created ParceI Count' = 1324. I can shrink a parcel (a lot) but it will not allow me to 'Build' the parcel (lot). Instead I receive the attached message (first attachment). I tried using the GP tool but the parcel still does not build successfully. However, if I try first try 'Build Extent' I will receive the same error message but a slightly different GP tool appears (see 2nd attachment) when clicking 'Yes.' This slightly different variation allows me to successfully 'Build' the parcel (lot). 3. Another scenario for a 'Record' that has a 'Created Parcel Count' = 739. There is one very large, multi-part that I can shrink but it will not 'Build' using the command or the GP tool. I tried exploding the parcel and then rebuilding but that still failed. The only solution I was able to do for this parcel was to create a new 'Record' assign all the features (lines, polygons), shrink the parcel, and then build. Do my comments above seem like normal behavior? Any comments and/or advice would be appreciated! Thank you! I am using ArcPro Version 3.0.1 and Enterprise 10.9.1.
... View more
02-06-2023
02:23 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1357
|
|
IDEA
|
A method to easily identify "orphan points" (i.e. points not covered by a line). Original discussion of this ide can be found at the link below. https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-parcel-fabric-questions/select-points-that-are-not-covered-by-lines/m-p/1148718#M602 Thank you!
... View more
12-16-2022
07:47 AM
|
5
|
4
|
1215
|
|
POST
|
Amir, Thank you for your reply. Yes this only seems to happen when we use the Task. My colleagues and myself have noticed that we cannot run the Task more than 1 or 2 times consecutively before having to close and reopen a fresh Pro project. It has become nearly impossible to use the same Project after running the Task multiple times. We have concluded that the Task runs best with a fresh project. We are using version 3.0.2. If I am being honest, 3.0.x performance has been far worse than 2.x. Chad
... View more
10-21-2022
06:34 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1128
|
|
POST
|
Hello All, I have created a Task to help correct errors in our PLSS Parcels in our Parcel Fabric. With each step of the Task, the performance of Pro slows noticeably. And if I use the Task in the same project to correct multiple PLSS parcels, Pro nearly grinds to a halt. Additionally, when I close Pro after using the Task I always receive the same warning message (see attachment). Is there anyway to clear the Cache/Clipboard intermittently while editing a version? Thank you
... View more
10-20-2022
09:59 AM
|
1
|
2
|
1183
|
|
POST
|
Is there a way to clear the Clipboard in Pro without closing a project? Thanks
... View more
10-20-2022
07:22 AM
|
2
|
2
|
2626
|
|
POST
|
Hello All, I have begun the process of Georeferencing Plats of Survey for our parcels. However, when I try to 'Move', 'Scale', and/or 'Rotate' the plat in Pro it disappears from view. I can load the Plat of Survey into Pro just fine (see attachment '1_LoadedPlat') but after setting SRS and then activating the 'Move' command from the 'Prepare' group the Plat disappears (see attachment '2_LoadedPlat'). I can get the plat to reappear if I click 'Add Control Points' from the 'Adjust' group (see attachment '3_AddControlPoints') but if I select the 'Move', 'Scale', and/or 'Rotate the plat will disappear again. Any help would be greatly appreciated! FYI: I have tried this in both version 2.9.3 and 3.0.1. I have also tried using a PDF > Export to TIFF and PDF > export to PNG
... View more
09-19-2022
10:08 AM
|
2
|
2
|
2253
|
|
POST
|
Hello All, I have begun the process of Georeferencing Plats of Survey for our parcels. However, when I try to 'Move', 'Scale', and/or 'Rotate' the plat in Pro it disappears from view. I can load the Plat of Survey into Pro just fine (see attachment '1_LoadedPlat') but after setting SRS and then activating the 'Move' command from the 'Prepare' group the Plat disappears (see attachment '2_LoadedPlat'). I can get the plat to reappear if I click 'Add Control Points' from the 'Adjust' group (see attachment '3_AddControlPoints') but if I select the 'Move', 'Scale', and/or 'Rotate the plat will disappear again. Any help would be greatly appreciated! FYI: I have tried this in both version 2.9.3 and 3.0.1. I have also tried using a PDF > Export to TIFF and PDF > export to PNG
... View more
09-19-2022
10:00 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1286
|
|
POST
|
@AmirBar-Maor Thank you for responding! The reason I am trying to get rid of this vertex and others like it, is we want to correct and avoid any gaps and/or misalignment issues between our parcel types. After migration many of our parcel types lost coincidence, this happened for a few reasons. However, there are numerous instances within our data where coincident lines do not share the same number of vertices. This has caused small overlaps and gaps between many of our parcel types. I also assumed that a point(s) on a line would have some affect when performing any type of spatial adjustments? And removing non relevant points and/or vertices would also improve spatial integrity? Chad
... View more
08-19-2022
11:05 AM
|
0
|
2
|
5033
|
|
POST
|
They do but I have been removing the erroneous vertex and/or vertices from them too. This includes lines and rebuilding the parcel.
... View more
08-19-2022
10:28 AM
|
0
|
1
|
5051
|
|
POST
|
Hello, I am currently attempting to clean-up our parcel data. One component of this clean-up process includes removing unnecessary and/or unwanted vertices from parcel lines. For the most part, I have been able to successfully remove said vertices. However, in some instances the vertices reappear after validating topology and I am confused as to why this is happening. I have been removing the unwanted vertices using one of two processes. One, shrink parcel and delete the vertice(s) from the appropriate parcel line and rebuild parcel. Repeat the process for any parcels and/or line(s) that are coincident and/or shared. For the other process, I shrink the parcel, redraw the erroneous lines, rebuild the parcel. In this scenario I also copy and paste the corrected line(s) to any other parcels that are coincident and/or shared. Both of the above processes work but once I validate topology the unwanted vertices reappear despite not being present in the lines or polygons prior to validating. I have attached screen captures to illustrate what is happening. I want to reiterate that I am also removing the erroneous vertex and/or vertices from any shared line and shrinking and rebuilding those parcels too. Any guidance, suggestions, or assistance would be greatly appreciated!
... View more
08-19-2022
10:18 AM
|
0
|
10
|
5874
|
|
POST
|
I was curious if a enterprise and/or file geodatabase can have two or more topologies? Can a feature dataset have two or more topologies?
... View more
08-01-2022
10:25 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1231
|
|
POST
|
Hello, Can you remove Adminstrative Parcel Type lines from the Parcel Fabric Topology? Thank you
... View more
07-17-2022
04:37 AM
|
0
|
0
|
543
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 09-10-2021 10:51 AM | |
| 2 | 10-20-2022 07:22 AM | |
| 1 | 02-06-2023 02:23 PM | |
| 1 | 03-18-2019 12:51 PM | |
| 5 | 12-16-2022 07:47 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
07-09-2025
09:28 AM
|