Latest Contributions by chadhickman

‎09-19-2022

Hello All, I have begun the process of Georeferencing Plats of Survey for our parcels. However, when I try to 'Move', 'Scale', and/or 'Rotate' the plat in Pro it disappears from view. I can load the Plat of Survey into Pro just fine (see attachment '1_LoadedPlat') but after setting SRS and then activating the 'Move' command from the 'Prepare' group the Plat disappears (see attachment '2_LoadedPlat'). I can get the plat to reappear if I click 'Add Control Points' from the 'Adjust' group (see attachment '3_AddControlPoints') but if I select the 'Move', 'Scale', and/or 'Rotate the plat will disappear again. Any help would be greatly appreciated! FYI: I have tried this in both version 2.9.3 and 3.0.1. I have also tried using a PDF > Export to TIFF and PDF > export to PNG

‎08-19-2022

@AmirBar-Maor Thank you for responding! The reason I am trying to get rid of this vertex and others like it, is we want to correct and avoid any gaps and/or misalignment issues between our parcel types. After migration many of our parcel types lost coincidence, this happened for a few reasons. However, there are numerous instances within our data where coincident lines do not share the same number of vertices. This has caused small overlaps and gaps between many of our parcel types. I also assumed that a point(s) on a line would have some affect when performing any type of spatial adjustments? And removing non relevant points and/or vertices would also improve spatial integrity? Chad

‎08-19-2022

They do but I have been removing the erroneous vertex and/or vertices from them too. This includes lines and rebuilding the parcel.

‎08-19-2022

Hello, I am currently attempting to clean-up our parcel data. One component of this clean-up process includes removing unnecessary and/or unwanted vertices from parcel lines. For the most part, I have been able to successfully remove said vertices. However, in some instances the vertices reappear after validating topology and I am confused as to why this is happening. I have been removing the unwanted vertices using one of two processes. One, shrink parcel and delete the vertice(s) from the appropriate parcel line and rebuild parcel. Repeat the process for any parcels and/or line(s) that are coincident and/or shared. For the other process, I shrink the parcel, redraw the erroneous lines, rebuild the parcel. In this scenario I also copy and paste the corrected line(s) to any other parcels that are coincident and/or shared. Both of the above processes work but once I validate topology the unwanted vertices reappear despite not being present in the lines or polygons prior to validating. I have attached screen captures to illustrate what is happening. I want to reiterate that I am also removing the erroneous vertex and/or vertices from any shared line and shrinking and rebuilding those parcels too. Any guidance, suggestions, or assistance would be greatly appreciated!

‎08-01-2022

I was curious if a enterprise and/or file geodatabase can have two or more topologies? Can a feature dataset have two or more topologies?

‎07-17-2022

Hello, Can you remove Adminstrative Parcel Type lines from the Parcel Fabric Topology? Thank you

‎04-07-2022

Amir, Thank you for getting back. Yes I would be interested in setting up a meeting to discuss the misalignment between administrative and non-administrative parcels. When we met last summer we discussed using the 'Import Parcel Points' and 'Rubbersheeting' GP tools to help correct a similar issue. We had mixed results with those tools. Two of the administrative parcel types (Land_Use and Site_Boundary) share the same record and their outer boundaries should be coincident. However, in many instances they are not coincident. These two parcels types outer boundaries should also be coincident with the outer boundaries of our 'OwnershipParcels.

‎04-06-2022

For example, there is a parcel line that measure N-00-00-00-W 500 ft. I new parcel is acquired that shares the same line but only the east 250 ft. thereof. How do you depict both measurements on the same line? Or do you simply create a new parcel line that is 250 ft. that will overlaps the 500 ft. line?

‎04-06-2022

Go Ween!

‎04-06-2022

Is it possible to put two (or more) COGO measurements on the same line?

‎04-06-2022

- Can you change Administrative Parcels to Non-Administrative Parcels without creating a new parcel type? - Can you add Administrative Parcels (polygons) to Topology? We have several Administrative Parcel's whose outer boundaries are not coincident with Non-Administrative Parcels. These parcel should be coincident and having a topology rule that could readily identify these misalignments would be helpful. Thank you

‎04-02-2022

Christine, Thank you for your response. The adminstrative lines were created with the adminstrative boundaries checked on. Since this is the case, how would I add a topology rule since they are not participating in topology? I have tried using the ‘Select By Location’ command but it queried the entire database. I then tried using the ‘Select By Location’ GP and changed the ‘Processing Extent’ to the current extent but it is still not selecting just the overlapping lines. Do you have any tips on what parameters I should be using to select just the overlapping lines using the ‘Select By Location’ GP tool? Thank you

‎04-01-2022

Do administrative lines participate in the parcel fabric topology? Can a topology and/or attribute rule be added to an administrative layer to identify overlapping lines?

‎04-01-2022

We have a set of administrative parcels in our fabric that is experiencing difficulties rebuilding after the parcel has been shrunk to a seed. Many of these parcels contain overlapping, short segmented lines, along with, an abundance of points. I was curious any of these circumstances would hinder the ability to build parcels after they have been shrunk? I have verified that the corresponding lines: A closed loop of lines All lines belong to the same record There is exactly one seed in the closed loop Thank you

‎04-01-2022

I have tried this but I have a large amount of lines and it take awhile for the selection to process. Is there a similar approach I could utilize by extent? Many of the overlapping lines are different lengths, if I used the 'Delete Identical' GP tool how would I know/verify if the proper line(s) are being deleted? Thanks

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	‎02-19-2024 09:54 PM

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by chadhickman

Plat of Survey Georeferencing

Re: Cannot remove unwanted vertex from parcel line(s)

Re: Cannot remove unwanted vertex from parcel line(s)

Cannot remove unwanted vertex from parcel line(s)

GDB have multiple topologies? Can a feature dataset have multiple topologies?

Remove Adminstrative Parcel lines from Topology

Re: Administrative Parcel Toplogy

Re: Can you put two or more COGO measurements on the same line?

Re: How do I maintain CAD COGO Dimensions when using copy-lines-to in Pro Fabric?

Can you put two or more COGO measurements on the same line?

Re: Administrative Parcel Toplogy

Re: Administrative Parcel Toplogy

Administrative Parcel Toplogy

Can overlapping lines, short segmented lines, and/or an excess of points cause parcels not to build from Seed

Re: Select Overlapping lines

Re: Select by Attributes misses records?

Clear Clipboard

Limit to number of parcels created by a 'Record'

Web Map Share - Pro

Tool to quickly identify 'Orphan Points."