Latest Contributions by AndyGup

Hi @GaryLSheppardJr can you repro in a codepen outside of Angular? On surface this doesn't look like an Angular issue. If not, can you provide a personal github repo or StackBlitz using this sample as your base template=> https://github.com/Esri/jsapi-resources/tree/main/esm-samples/jsapi-angular-cli ? ... View more

Adding on to Sage's comments, this looks like an issue with Express and not related to the ArcGIS JS SDK. Here's a link to their documentation: https://expressjs.com/en/resources/middleware/cors.html. They specify a number of different CORS options that might fix the issue. ... View more

Hi@BryanMc  can you reproduce this outside of Vite in a vanilla JS app using the ArcGIS ESM CDN? Also, we'll need a github repo or stackblitz so we can try to reproduce the issue. Reference: https://github.com/Esri/jsapi-resources/blob/main/TROUBLESHOOTING.md ... View more

This appears to be related to a known issue with Calcite: https://github.com/Esri/jsapi-resources/tree/main/esm-samples/jsapi-angular-cli#known-issues. Try disabling the zone.js monkey patching for click events. Here's a diff that shows what you need to do  https://github.com/Esri/jsapi-resources/issues/481#issuecomment-1687048980. ... View more

Thanks for reporting, I am able to repro on 4.28 and 4.29-next. We'll take a closer look. ... View more

Hi @Wittawat  thanks for reporting, I've opened an issue for us to take a closer look. As @Justin_Greco mentions, the Compass widget does take into account spatial references. It's different from the Track and Locate widgets because it has two default icons, one for Web Mercator/WGS 84 (compass needle) and one for all other spatial references (arrow).  ... View more

It's been a while since I used Jest with Angular and no guarantee that it will work, but you may need to do something like this in your Jest config: "transformIgnorePatterns": [    "node_modules/(?!(@angular|@arcgis|@esri|@stencil/)" ], And, you might also need: https://www.npmjs.com/package/jest-preset-angular. ... View more

Hi @hectorsalamanca you might try using esriRequest instead, it uses native fetch: https://developers.arcgis.com/javascript/latest/api-reference/esri-request.html#esriRequest. Here's a working example that uses the pattern: https://github.com/Esri/jsapi-resources/blob/main/esm-samples/jsapi-node/src/request.mjs. ... View more

Hi @mbussey, that's correct - if you install 4.23.7, then it will include watchUtils. ... View more

@JonathanTiuI I verified in Charles while using Chrome that the SDK's wasm requests are being correctly cached. Chrome 119 dev tools appear to be incorrectly reporting cached file requests as HTTP 200s. Here's a screenshot: Also, the wasm scripts are being loaded correctly (synchronously). This is the pattern defined by the WorkerGlobalScope of the browser's Web Workers API,. More information is available on MDN here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WorkerGlobalScope/importScripts. As you may know, when stalls are reported in the network tab of the dev console, they can be the result of many different factors. Taking that into account, I didn't see anything unusual after multiple tests. We will continue to investigate the size of the workers. ... View more

@JonathanTiu  with regards to the increased init.js request times, thanks for the information. That might be related to a size increase in the worker between 4.27 and 4.28. I can also repro dev tools reporting the init.js requests being stalled when caching is enabled. We need to do some research. I'll open an issue pending some initial investigation. It's not clear what's actually happening versus what might be misreported in dev tools, e.g. 200 vs 304 status response codes. ... View more

Hi @JonathanTiu, you should only see the first request to  https://js.arcgis.com/4.28/esri/core/workers/init.js, depending on how you've configured Charles. You shouldn't see any other subsequent requests to the same modules, e.g. init.js. If the browser is caching correctly, there will only be that one request, confirming that browser caching is working correctly. Did that make more sense? ... View more