Latest Contributions by RussRoberts

Yup correct. displaying a multipatch feature layer in the web would no scale and be very expensive and is why we use the 3D layers for display. No steps to convert but at publish time you will see an associate scene layer being published along side the feature layer (this method will use credits to generate the scene layer in ArcGIS Online) or you can create it locally in Pro using create scene layer package tool.  ... View more

Correct, you will need to use a 3D layer https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-online/reference/scene-layers.htm   For surfaces you could also publish an elevation layer and use that in your scene  https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-online/manage-data/publish-elevation-layers.htm ... View more

Save As is creating a new feature layer item that is using the original hosted service. Its not the original hosted feature layer item so that's why it does not say hosted but if you looked at the layer JSON you will see it just points to the same service as the hosted one but you cannot alter editing functionality, overall sharing level of the original service and more. It is also not a view where a backing view layer has the restricted area of interest, fields and editing configuration.  ... View more

You will have to publish the multipatch as a scene layer. You can do this locally with a scene layer package and upload that to ArcGIS Online (for use in globe you can use web merc or WGS84). This case works if its just a static layer you do not expect to update often. If you ever need to update it we have a replace scene layer workflow where you swap out services within the items. If its one that requires updating you can publish a multipatch feature layer with a scene layer from Pro or you can publish the feature layer first to ArcGIS Online and then from the item details page publish that scene layer.    Some links to help https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-online/3d-gis/how-to-publish-scene-layers-in-arcgis-online https://learn.arcgis.com/en/projects/share-digital-building-models-in-3D-web-scenes/ https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-online/3d-gis/authoring-3d-layers-and-creating-web-scenes-in-arcgis-online https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-online/data-management/update-hosted-scene-layers-using-replace-layer https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-online/data-management/editing-and-updating-hosted-scene-layers ... View more

Can you share the symbols as a web style and then you can use them in Map Viewer?  ... View more

This is because it is a dictionary style. We currently do not support using these for styling in Map Viewer but it is something we are looking into. To help with how we plan to support this did you create this dictionary symbol set on your or are you using one of the sets provided by esri? What are you using it for?   One of the things that will be different with dictionary vs. other web styles - when we do support this it will have to be a dictionary web style that also follows the layer and map level of sharing so we have access to the dictionary logic used for the symbols for the users that have access to the map. Is this a pattern that would work for your case?  ... View more

They are not a part of the default gallery but can be brought into a organization group and have that set under the admin organization settings where you can define your symbol galleries or you can add them in Map Viewer.   When styling a symbol you can click on the + button in the symbol category picker (both sketch and symbol styling have this)   Then you can search ArcGIS Online (default will initially search My Content) and use this search term     You can also go to this group and find a collection of desktop and web styles you can share to your org or use the itemid in the search above to find a specific style https://www.arcgis.com/home/group.html?sortField=modified&sortOrder=desc&id=7687bc306b8048a48efd92b3a6da9d88#content   ... View more

Are you able to share the map and layer and we can take a look at what could be happening. If it cant be shared publicly you can invite russell_jsapi into a group.    Thanks ... View more

This is on our roadmap to add support for authoring/editing scale and manual based display filters. If you can give your workflow/use case for this would be helpful as we work on this feature. ... View more

We believe the using of the same account across multiple apps sending data to the track layer was causing an issue with the auto line generation of the line feature layer in the track layer. The Track viewer doesn't use that same track line and generates a line on the fly from the track points.  ... View more

If you can share the map/layer I can take a look.  ... View more

This is currently not supported in our web rendering in labeling but we are looking at expanding the labeling options. We wont be able to achieve full maplex labeling controls but looking at options that are best for web rendering and dynamic maps.  ... View more

So it is a limit that we have with rendering in this overlap case here and can also be seen in Pro.  A workaround I have tried out and which maybe could fit your workflow was following the steps John did in this tutorial where he had multiple state boundaries that could conflict with one another. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yn7rxPeaGgw ... View more

Nope this does not consume credits. This generates a resource on the web map to help the AI component. Doing this in the web map makes the map ready vs. having to have the AI component generate the embeddings at launch time which could take some time depending on the number of layers, fields and other variables.  cc\ @KristianEkenes  ... View more

Thanks for posting this idea. We currently do not have a unit in the sizeinfo in the web map spec but it is something we are looking into with the Pro team.  ... View more