POST
|
Hello Survey123 Community and @JamesTedrick or @IsmaelChivite We have several forms that have been in use for months that utilize the theme-grid pages style functionality to break up the form for ease of use. We have had several users call that these forms are no longer displaying with pages and are instead 1 very long page. All our users are using iOS devices. We have isolated this issue to users that have the latest version 3.13.229 of Survey123. Furthermore, users that are still on 3.12.277 are still seeing the form displayed as 19 pages...even after updating the form itself. So, it seems to be an issue with version 3.13.229. I have not been able to find any information on changing the way pages style work in the latest version Is there a change in the pages style functionality? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Brandon
... View more
09-20-2021
09:41 AM
|
2
|
8
|
1327
|
POST
|
This is a bug in 10.8.1 Enterprise. BUG-000136016: Unable to select existing surveys using the Survey w.. (esri.com). It has been resolved in 10.9 Enterprise.
... View more
07-15-2021
03:40 PM
|
1
|
1
|
2894
|
POST
|
Thank you guys for such a quick response and solution. We create the .csv file using Pandas in a python script. A simple fix for this was to set index=False when creating the .csv file, which eliminated the empty header in column A. Would not have known to apply that change without your testing and solution. Thanks again! Brandon
... View more
02-25-2021
05:15 PM
|
0
|
3
|
3645
|
POST
|
Hello Survey123 Community and @JamesTedrick or @IsmaelChivite We have a form that has been in use for months that utilizes the pull data functionality to populate some fields in the form based on a barcode scan. We have had several users call that are not getting data populated in those fields after a barcode scan. All our users are using iOS devices. We have isolated this issue to users that have version 3.12.274 of Survey123. We've verified that the necessary .csv file is in the media folder within the Portal item and that the data is properly populated in the file itself. Furthermore, users that are still on 3.11.164 are able to scan and get the necessary fields populated...even after updating the form itself. So, it seems to be an issue with version 3.12.274. I have not been able to find any information on version 3.12.274. Is there a change in the pulldata() functionality? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Brandon
... View more
02-25-2021
09:37 AM
|
0
|
49
|
13913
|
POST
|
Once they complete the survey, if they are offline, it will place the survey in the Outbox as you mention. Unfortunately, opening that survey again and and making changes just applies edits to the same survey (record). We need to be able to create a completely new survey from the same existing record in the Inbox. Once the user has selected a survey from the Inbox, and completes that selected survey, whether it is in their Outbox or Sent, it is no longer available in the Inbox until they refresh. This is preventing them from being able to complete an additional survey for that same existing record from the Inbox.
... View more
01-22-2021
08:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
588
|
POST
|
We have several surveys that utilize the inbox functionality. In our design, the inbox is the parent record, and we are capturing related data in a repeat. The repeat (related data) are inspections done at facilities. In some cases, these inspections need to be completed multiple times a day at the same facility. The issue we are running into: 1. User opens survey, selects Inbox and refreshes the inbox at the beginning of the day (while in cell coverage) 2. User selects an inbox record, and completes an inspection (This causes the inbox record that they selected to no longer be available). 3. Later in the day, the user needs to complete another inspection for the same facility, but cannot due to the record no longer being available (and they do not cell service to be able to refresh the inbox). Is there a way to keep all the inbox records even after there has been a survey completed for the records?
... View more
01-21-2021
08:27 AM
|
0
|
2
|
612
|
POST
|
Doug, That is a creative workaround. I think in my case I'd prefer to avoid the potential for confusion with the users having to delete repeats. The whole repeat portion of the form seems to be the most difficult for our users to grasp. Adding nested repeats is even more confusing to them. I ended up using a hosted feature service that has the schema Survey123 is expecting with the _count fields where necessary. Then, I use FME to sync the data from the hosted data store to my Oracle database nightly, ignoring the _count field in the hosted service.
... View more
09-11-2020
09:23 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2333
|
POST
|
Hello Disha, I was not able to resolve the issue with the _count field in Oracle. The workaround I came up with was to use a hosted feature service with Survey123, then sync the data collected in the hosted data store to my enterprise Oracle geodatabase using FME on a nightly basis. This allows the Survey123 app to honor repeat count and have the necessary _count field in the hosted feature service. I ignore the _count field in the hosted feature service when syncing the data to my enterprise Oracle database. Hope that helps, good luck!
... View more
09-11-2020
08:54 AM
|
2
|
1
|
4309
|
BLOG
|
I ran into this issue and was able to resolve it by removing the request to be returned in json format. So, change the url in the request: Original line: data_url = "<portalurl>/<webadaptorname>/sharing/rest/content/items/{0}/data/?f=json&token={1}".format(itemID, agol_helper.token) New line: data_url = "<portalurl>/<webadaptorname>/sharing/rest/content/items/{0}/data/?token={1}".format(itemID, agol_helper.token)
... View more
05-08-2020
11:05 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5009
|
POST
|
I have put in the request. Thanks for the suggestion.
... View more
12-19-2019
11:54 AM
|
0
|
0
|
489
|
POST
|
We have a form with the inbox enabled. One of the attributes is a barcode id. We would like to allow the users to have the ability to scan the barcode in the inbox search to get to the record. Is this possible?
... View more
12-18-2019
08:32 AM
|
0
|
3
|
591
|
POST
|
James, Our issue with adding this field to the feature service is that our back end DBMS is Oracle, and all field names are created with all uppercase characters. Unfortunately, Survey123 Connect creates the _count field in all lowercase, which is preventing the publishing from completing due to the case mismatch. I have tried to run the alter field gp tool to change the case of the field in the feature class, but it does not change. I've also attempted this workaround to accomplish changing the case of the field, but it did not work either. So, it seems I don't have control to change the case of the field name in our Oracle db, or in Survey123 Connect. Even though the field exists in our feature service, Survey123 Connect will not recognize it. Any suggestions on how to get around this?
... View more
12-10-2019
12:05 PM
|
0
|
4
|
4309
|
POST
|
That explains the _count field being generated by S123 Connect regardless of what I enter in the repeat_count field. In an attempt to publish my survey, I have created the necessary _count field in my feature service. However, the field name is all uppercase in my Oracle db and thus the feature service. This is preventing my survey from publishing due to the _count field that is automatically created by S123 Connect being all lowercase: Is there a way to control the case of the _count field that is created by S123 Connect? Or, ignore case of the fields in the feature service when publishing? Btw, I have tried to change the case of the field in my Oracle db, but it will not allow me to do so. Thanks, Brandon
... View more
12-06-2019
02:14 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2005
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 05-13-2023 10:12 AM | |
2 | 05-10-2023 06:51 AM | |
1 | 05-10-2023 06:40 AM | |
1 | 01-12-2022 07:07 AM | |
1 | 09-20-2021 08:17 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|