Latest Contributions by DamienPyne

‎07-15-2019

From the images relating to the Utility Network - Dirty Area of point features, what unit of measure is used with the buffer distance to create the polygons? It appears the buffer distance is always 0.5 so the diameter/perimeter distance is 1 and the unit of measure is based on the reference coordinate system of the utility network service/datasource. In the Naperville Demo data, the reference coordinate system of the data/service is projected of feet (NAD 1983 StatePlane Illinois East FIPS 1201) and the resulting dirty area is 1ft perimeter. We have developed a PoC with data in Geocentric Datum Australia 2020 (GDA2020) which is geographic in decimal degrees. 1degree in distance is approx. 101-111km depending if relates to Latitude or Longitude. As you can see, the perimeter distance is approx. 100-110kms which is a consistent methodology to the 1feet example with the Naperville data. Also, can it be confirmed this resulting buffer is passed to a minimum bounding box function to produce the rectangle as the buffer on points creates circles? Paul LeBlanc‌ is this related to the projection issue mentioned in Applying WaterDistribution_AssetPackage fails‌ or related to Apply Asset Package error - Get attribute metersPerUnit does not exist‌

‎07-14-2019

Thanks Rushi. This is still not clear. As you mentioned and indicated in the table there appears to be a version dependency, yet the dot points above the table are contradictory.

‎07-09-2019

We have recently built a PoC environment of pro2.4/10.7.1/UN v3.1, yet still have a pro2.3/10.6.1/v2.0.1 environment available. After ensuring I am pointed to the correct portal, I have tried to open one of the pro2.3/v2.0.1 project files on pro 2.4 and cannot see the details of the Utility Network properties, and therefore UN functions fail. (ie validate topology states the service is not enabled) The dark theme is viewing on pro 2.4, while the light theme is pro 2.3 for the same map and portal, etc. The same issue occurred when adding the raw v2.3 service to a new map in pro 2.4. is there a compatibility link between pro2.4 and UN v3; and pro2.3 and UN v2?

‎07-08-2019

Thanks John. I understand this. The issue is the data appears to be migrated incorrectly with the domain codes in the dataset creating errors as the validation is for the domain description. There are other examples such as switch status' have the value 2 presented to the user, causing this to be an error as the domain description being validated is open or closed.

‎07-07-2019

Looking in the new UNM3.0 and 3.1 asset package models, it appears the some of the domain datasets have the domain code and descriptions swapped. This causes the demo data to error. Is this an error in the asset package?

‎07-01-2019

Another example that needs clarity. What is the need for individual taps for a 3ph to 3ph connection? Could this be solved with a single tap?

‎07-01-2019

The website (https://solutions.arcgis.com/electric/help/electric-utility-network-configuration/use/what-is-the-data-model.htm) there used to be a ER style diagram of the data model is now blank. Where can this diagram now be sourced to view the existing/new relationships to the Structure & Electric feature classes and the new related tables? Thanks

‎07-01-2019

Hi there, Is there any documentation/models on the fundamentals? I’m struggling to see these. The models at the moment I’m looking for relate to Taps - Is a tap required per phase/neutral or a single tap with a phase attribute. Having a tap per phase seems a bit excessive and it clutters the network. As described in the story map image, the line is a 3ph line. Why is there a need for 3 taps? If only for the 3 individual fuses these could be modelled as a single object with attributes to indicate 3ph. Crossarms - With the new related table, how do you model crossarms related to structure junctions (eg. Poles) and more importantly relate them to the line? The main sequence of relationships is electric line supported by a crossarm which is supported/structural attachment to the pole. This type of relationships is required to be used by interfaces to EAM systems. Also, how to model crossarm relationships to other features (eg. EDO fuse mounted on it) Are there any restrictions on the amount and types of relationships between features? Can a record in a related table be part of containment (eg. A crossarm part of a pole mounted substation)? Thanks

‎06-19-2019

Paul I have been trying to build a model using GDA2020/AHD, using the naperville datamodel with ST for Australia. I had been able to build a blank database using pro2.3.1 and untools 2.3.1. I tried to build another database under the same approach (GDA2020/AHD naperville DM) this time with Pro 2.3.3/untools 2.3.1, loading a single feature from our dataset (a single feature as we have had issues when turning on topology with >10000 features - conversation for another day). This failed in the same location as others have had - invalid arcade expression. 2019-06-20 09:41:46 Start Time: Thursday, 20 June 2019 9:41:45 AM Succeeded at Thursday, 20 June 2019 9:41:46 AM (Elapsed Time: 0.06 seconds) 2019-06-20 09:41:46 ImportAttributeRules (15/16) 2019-06-20 09:41:46 ...ImportAttributeRules (84/32) 2019-06-20 09:43:25 Start Time: Thursday, 20 June 2019 9:42:20 AM Succeeded at Thursday, 20 June 2019 9:43:11 AM (Elapsed Time: 50.95 seconds) 2019-06-20 09:43:25 ...ImportAttributeRules (85/32) 2019-06-20 09:45:09 Start Time: Thursday, 20 June 2019 9:44:04 AM Succeeded at Thursday, 20 June 2019 9:44:54 AM (Elapsed Time: 50.00 seconds) 2019-06-20 09:45:09 ...ImportAttributeRules (86/32) 2019-06-20 09:46:55 Start Time: Thursday, 20 June 2019 9:45:48 AM Succeeded at Thursday, 20 June 2019 9:46:40 AM (Elapsed Time: 52.19 seconds) 2019-06-20 09:46:55 ...ImportAttributeRules (87/32) 2019-06-20 09:47:55 ERROR 002717: Invalid Arcade expression, SCRIPTEXPRESSION (row 2) Failed to execute (ImportAttributeRules). Failed to execute (AssetPackageToUtilityNetwork). Do you have any ideas on how to get around this issue? I am also interested in understanding more on "It is specific to that coordinate system (among others) and not having data". What coordinate systems are impacted and why is there an impact? Thanks Damien Edit: This failed with the same message without data on Pro2.3.3/untools 2.3.1

‎06-10-2019

I have just upgraded my PC from win7 to win10 and have installed arcpro 2.3.3. When trying to open my project that was created on win7 using pro2.3.1 I am now receiving an error. Update: Using an admin profile I have no issues. Is there a certain permission that needs to be applied in windows 10?

‎05-26-2019

Vish, I would talk to your esri inc partner. I heard they may have discovered a bug in the tracing tool that was failing to trace cascading feeders in the same tier. It sounds like you wouldn't be able to trace NMI-TNI without defining a bunch of tiers. I have also heard that a future release will combine to a single domain tier.

‎05-15-2019

We have been running some PoC works on the electric utility network asset package. Mostly there is a good general understanding of the UN and how to create and configure own own, but as expected we keep finding some issues that may be just related to the AP config without knowing all the ins and outs. Our most recent works have been for an editing to create a new network and tie this into the existing dataset (new subsource and open an existing switch). The user created the new network and opened the switch without issue. When they have run the update subnetworks GP the subnetlines feature creates but the subnetwork name attribute stops along the feeder, conflicting with the subnetwork line. This has been repeated by this user in a separate version. The red circle shows where the new subnetwork controller has been created, and the updated subnetline feature is the white outline on the network to the right (shown clearer in image 2) This shows the updated subnetlines, and the location of the opened switch. Feeder id (subnetwork name) attribute not updated on the electric lines as shown below. This location is shown about with an "X" in the image above. From the online documentation and Esri UN training we have completed this should be a simple workflow: 1) add and configure new subnetwrok controller 2) add new network and tie into existing network 3) open existing swtich 4) validate, save and run update subnetworks Is there any other functions or configurations we need to be aware of for this to propagate through correctly?

‎05-13-2019

Richard, Yes this appears to be correct as UN is not an extension but a licensed server role. I have the same here with our current PoC solution. Damien

‎05-12-2019

Thanks Sami. Yes aware of the utility owner account. In fact we have found this is not just the owner account but the creator account. I have tried the using the service as the input and the database connection without consistent success with either. Paul LeBlanc‌ I'll take your advice and raise a support ticket on it also.

‎05-09-2019

Yes this is with the service running. I am testing different configurations settings for our potential build.

Online Status	Online
Date Last Visited	3 hours ago

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by DamienPyne

Dirty area measurement of use

Re: Is arc pro linked to a specific version of the utility network?

Is arc pro linked to a specific version of the utility network?

Re: Utility Network v3.0/3.1 - Wire Data domain

Utility Network v3.0/3.1 - Wire Data domain

Re: Pro2.4: Fundamental modelling parts of the network

Pro2.4: electric utility model v3.0 ER Diagram

Pro2.4: Fundamental modelling parts of the network

Re: Applying WaterDistribution_AssetPackage fails

Arcgis pro 2.3.3 on win10 error for utility network project file

Re: UNTools Asset Package for Electric Distribution and Transmission in single domain

Editing in the UN Asset Package is not updating subnetworks correct

Re: Installing Utility Network Management Extension

Re: Utility network Disable Topology doesn't always work!!

Re: Utility network Disable Topology doesn't always work!!

Re: Dirty area measurement of use

Dirty area measurement of use

Re: Dirty area measurement of use

Re: How to change ownership of UN from portal user...

Re: Utility Network--how to determine what codes t...