Latest Contributions by DamienPyne

‎04-22-2024

Thanks Mike, I have raised a support ticket.

‎04-21-2024

No nothing special as I added a the new layer set to a new map (and pro project file). The only other difference is as part of the upgrade we are migrating from SQL SVR to HANA. Any thoughts on this being an impact?

‎04-21-2024

Yes we have played all around the tolerance and this has no impact. As part of our upgrade we are also migrating from SQLServer to HANA. I dont know if there is a setting, tolerance, something that is working differently in the HANA DB.

‎04-18-2024

We are upgrading our environment from Ent10.8.1, AGP2.7.4 to Ent11.1, AGP3.1 (or greater). As part of our testing are having issues where the object being created is highlighting the proposed snap offset the the grid location when using AGP3.1, while this issue does not occur in AGP2.7. I have been comparing the settings in both maps and cannot see any issues. Creating a new Point feature (1:35) (AGP2.7) Same feature created and snapped to Grid Intersection (1:1) AGP 3.1: Creating a new Point feature (1:1) Edit Vertices – moving an existing vertice on a line (1:1) Move – moving an existing point feature (1:1) Creating a new Transformer (snapped to the vertical line) (1:1)

‎04-18-2024

No duplicate references. It is strange as it works for a brand new line then will not work for modifying data. But i did add a brand new service in without any symbology, etc and this is working as expected. Sounds like we have an issue in the map config. Could a duplicate layer be the primary issue for causing this? (We shouldnt have any thus looking for ideas) Edit: I added the data just raw not as subtype group layers as required for UNM content. I went back and added the data again as subtype group layers and have the same issue. This doesnt appear to be a duplicate layer issue.

‎04-17-2024

We are in the process of upgrading from system from Ent10.8.1, AGP2.7.4, UN3 to Ent 11.1, AGP3.2 (or greater) and UNM6. When reviewing or changing the terminals for a line, the modify terminals pane is blank. This works as expected initially when setting a terminal for the first time, but outside of that workflow the pane is null. As shown below, there are terminals set for this object, but modify terminals does not display the content. Setting a new object showing the terminal config, that then is not visible to update Any ideas on why this isnt working as expected?

‎04-16-2024

This works as expected in agp31. I will get a ticket raised for agp3.2

‎04-16-2024

Thanks @RobertKrisher I will get an installation of 3.1, test and advise.

‎04-14-2024

We are in the process of upgrading from system from Ent10.8.1, AGP2.7.4, UN3 to Ent 11.1, AGP3.2 (or greater) and UNM6. One of our workflows, when setting associations, users will typically do a broader select to update associations, trusting the system to make the appropriate selection, based on our configured rules, then review and apply. In AGP2.7.4 this can handle where an association already exists and only apply the changes. In AGP3.2 (and proven back in AGP2.9) users receive an error if an association already exists, and the modify associations pane shows the duplicate entry (shown below) User receives an error message when pressing apply. This error remains until the user removes the duplicate record. Is this expected behaviour? Surely the tool can handle checking if the association exists or not like it does in AGP2.7.4.

‎07-25-2022

Hi @RomuldKiobya Yes you can add your own rules and there are different GP tools to assist. See the links below for further information and support. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/help/data/utility-network/import-utility-network-rules.htm https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/help/data/utility-network/add-connectivity-rules.htm I would say, just be very specific and cautious in the rules you create or add. Speaking from experience, the rules need to support the modelling you require, but the model also needs to support the rules.

‎07-18-2022

Hi @Danvey Have you read the release notes on agp3.0 stating this is a breaking release and older files won't work directly in this version? https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-pro/announcements/get-ready-for-arcgis-pro-3-0/ This could be your issue.

‎07-10-2022

Thanks @Scott_Harris

‎07-07-2022

Thanks @Scott_Harris I should have included above, we are using ArcGIS Pro 2.7.4 on enterprise 10.8.1, UNM v3. The team are trying to use the absolute, as they know the location of the pole. I will follow up further with the staff. You are correct that it does work, if you don't click in the unrequired field (ie clear the z and edit x or y). Our first issue was all 3 values were populated, and Z being last when cleared, remained red as mandatory. Our next challenge with this tool (maybe a different thread is needed), we can get the objects to move, but they are moving relative to the parent association, and the points connected to lines, do not move the line vertex with the point.

‎07-06-2022

ArcGIS Pro has the "move to" tool but this requires all 3 values to be populated (XYZ). It would be beneficial if you could choose which of these are required for the move. In our utility network model, we have modelled our network in 3D - like the real world. At time users pull the pole sites for various reasons and then need to put the site back together. Enhancing this tool would allow the user to pull apart the site, do the modifications, then set only the X and Y values to pull the data back together.

‎07-09-2020

I am trying to validate the errors in our migrated data and found there are duplicated records presented in Pro. Can someone please explain why Pro contains duplicated records.

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	a month ago

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by DamienPyne

Re: Modify terminals pane not showing in AGP3.2

Re: Modify terminals pane not showing in AGP3.2

Re: object snapping not aligned to grid location

object snapping not aligned to grid location

Re: Modify terminals pane not showing in AGP3.2

Modify terminals pane not showing in AGP3.2

Re: Modify Associations Pane: Existing Association Error

Re: Modify Associations Pane: Existing Association Error

Modify Associations Pane: Existing Association Error

Re: CAN I ADD NEW CONNECTIVITY RULE MORE THAN THOSE BELOW IN ARCGIS UTILITY NETWORK?

Re: ArcGIS Pro 3.0 stuck on loading map

Re: The move to tool needs Z as optional

Re: The move to tool needs Z as optional

The move to tool needs Z as optional

Why are errors duplicated in Arcgis Pro?

Re: Update subnetwork and de-energized equipment

Re: Conduit Configuration vs Circuit/Feeder Maps

Re: Circuit Breaker - Subnetwork Controller vs Non...

Re: Comms Utility Network with Electric UN

Re: Contingent values changes the subtype selected

APAC Utilities Community of Practice