Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Cancel
- Home
- :
- About DamienPyne
DamienPyne
Frequent Contributor
since
06-13-2017
05-27-2026
108
Posts created
34
Kudos given
3
Solutions
45
Kudos received
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
My Ideas
(1 Idea Submissions)Latest Contributions by DamienPyne
|
POST
|
No nothing special as I added a the new layer set to a new map (and pro project file). The only other difference is as part of the upgrade we are migrating from SQL SVR to HANA. Any thoughts on this being an impact?
... View more
04-21-2024
01:58 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2010
|
|
POST
|
Yes we have played all around the tolerance and this has no impact. As part of our upgrade we are also migrating from SQLServer to HANA. I dont know if there is a setting, tolerance, something that is working differently in the HANA DB.
... View more
04-21-2024
01:48 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2002
|
|
POST
|
We are upgrading our environment from Ent10.8.1, AGP2.7.4 to Ent11.1, AGP3.1 (or greater). As part of our testing are having issues where the object being created is highlighting the proposed snap offset the the grid location when using AGP3.1, while this issue does not occur in AGP2.7. I have been comparing the settings in both maps and cannot see any issues. Creating a new Point feature (1:35) (AGP2.7) Same feature created and snapped to Grid Intersection (1:1) AGP 3.1: Creating a new Point feature (1:1) Edit Vertices – moving an existing vertice on a line (1:1) Move – moving an existing point feature (1:1) Creating a new Transformer (snapped to the vertical line) (1:1)
... View more
04-18-2024
04:48 PM
|
0
|
5
|
2126
|
|
POST
|
No duplicate references. It is strange as it works for a brand new line then will not work for modifying data. But i did add a brand new service in without any symbology, etc and this is working as expected. Sounds like we have an issue in the map config. Could a duplicate layer be the primary issue for causing this? (We shouldnt have any thus looking for ideas) Edit: I added the data just raw not as subtype group layers as required for UNM content. I went back and added the data again as subtype group layers and have the same issue. This doesnt appear to be a duplicate layer issue.
... View more
04-18-2024
01:27 PM
|
0
|
4
|
2032
|
|
POST
|
We are in the process of upgrading from system from Ent10.8.1, AGP2.7.4, UN3 to Ent 11.1, AGP3.2 (or greater) and UNM6. When reviewing or changing the terminals for a line, the modify terminals pane is blank. This works as expected initially when setting a terminal for the first time, but outside of that workflow the pane is null. As shown below, there are terminals set for this object, but modify terminals does not display the content. Setting a new object showing the terminal config, that then is not visible to update Any ideas on why this isnt working as expected?
... View more
04-17-2024
04:39 PM
|
0
|
6
|
2133
|
|
POST
|
This works as expected in agp31. I will get a ticket raised for agp3.2
... View more
04-16-2024
02:02 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1277
|
|
POST
|
Thanks @RobertKrisher I will get an installation of 3.1, test and advise.
... View more
04-16-2024
01:15 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1278
|
|
POST
|
We are in the process of upgrading from system from Ent10.8.1, AGP2.7.4, UN3 to Ent 11.1, AGP3.2 (or greater) and UNM6. One of our workflows, when setting associations, users will typically do a broader select to update associations, trusting the system to make the appropriate selection, based on our configured rules, then review and apply. In AGP2.7.4 this can handle where an association already exists and only apply the changes. In AGP3.2 (and proven back in AGP2.9) users receive an error if an association already exists, and the modify associations pane shows the duplicate entry (shown below) User receives an error message when pressing apply. This error remains until the user removes the duplicate record. Is this expected behaviour? Surely the tool can handle checking if the association exists or not like it does in AGP2.7.4.
... View more
04-14-2024
08:10 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1391
|
|
POST
|
Hi @RomuldKiobya Yes you can add your own rules and there are different GP tools to assist. See the links below for further information and support. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/help/data/utility-network/import-utility-network-rules.htm https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.9/help/data/utility-network/add-connectivity-rules.htm I would say, just be very specific and cautious in the rules you create or add. Speaking from experience, the rules need to support the modelling you require, but the model also needs to support the rules.
... View more
07-25-2022
01:50 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2773
|
|
POST
|
Hi @Danvey Have you read the release notes on agp3.0 stating this is a breaking release and older files won't work directly in this version? https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-pro/announcements/get-ready-for-arcgis-pro-3-0/ This could be your issue.
... View more
07-18-2022
02:24 PM
|
0
|
5
|
11777
|
|
IDEA
|
Thanks @Scott_Harris I should have included above, we are using ArcGIS Pro 2.7.4 on enterprise 10.8.1, UNM v3. The team are trying to use the absolute, as they know the location of the pole. I will follow up further with the staff. You are correct that it does work, if you don't click in the unrequired field (ie clear the z and edit x or y). Our first issue was all 3 values were populated, and Z being last when cleared, remained red as mandatory. Our next challenge with this tool (maybe a different thread is needed), we can get the objects to move, but they are moving relative to the parent association, and the points connected to lines, do not move the line vertex with the point.
... View more
07-07-2022
02:02 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2470
|
|
IDEA
|
ArcGIS Pro has the "move to" tool but this requires all 3 values to be populated (XYZ). It would be beneficial if you could choose which of these are required for the move. In our utility network model, we have modelled our network in 3D - like the real world. At time users pull the pole sites for various reasons and then need to put the site back together. Enhancing this tool would allow the user to pull apart the site, do the modifications, then set only the X and Y values to pull the data back together.
... View more
07-06-2022
09:01 PM
|
0
|
5
|
2512
|
|
POST
|
I am trying to validate the errors in our migrated data and found there are duplicated records presented in Pro. Can someone please explain why Pro contains duplicated records.
... View more
07-09-2020
05:09 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1378
|
My kudoed posts
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 02-23-2026 01:39 PM | |
| 2 | 02-05-2026 04:30 PM | |
| 3 | 01-27-2026 12:40 PM | |
| 1 | 02-27-2025 12:16 PM | |
| 1 | 11-20-2024 03:10 PM |
Activity Feed
- Got a Kudo for Re: Update subnetwork and de-energized equipment. 02-23-2026 04:07 PM
- Posted Re: Update subnetwork and de-energized equipment on Electric Questions. 02-23-2026 01:39 PM
- Kudoed Re: Update subnetwork and de-energized equipment for MikeMillerGIS. 02-23-2026 01:36 PM
- Posted Re: Update subnetwork and de-energized equipment on Electric Questions. 02-22-2026 02:36 PM
- Posted Re: Update subnetwork and de-energized equipment on Electric Questions. 02-19-2026 01:09 PM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Conduit Configuration vs Circuit/Feeder Maps. 02-12-2026 01:04 PM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Conduit Configuration vs Circuit/Feeder Maps. 02-06-2026 10:28 AM
- Posted Re: Conduit Configuration vs Circuit/Feeder Maps on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 02-05-2026 04:30 PM
- Kudoed Re: Container/Association View for gis_KIWI4. 02-05-2026 12:31 PM
- Kudoed Seperation of UN Data Ownership and privileges for specific UN-based tasks for SteffenMarkert2. 02-04-2026 02:01 PM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Circuit Breaker - Subnetwork Controller vs Non-Subnetwork Controller. 01-27-2026 01:38 PM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Circuit Breaker - Subnetwork Controller vs Non-Subnetwork Controller. 01-27-2026 12:54 PM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Circuit Breaker - Subnetwork Controller vs Non-Subnetwork Controller. 01-27-2026 12:43 PM
- Posted Re: Circuit Breaker - Subnetwork Controller vs Non-Subnetwork Controller on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 01-27-2026 12:40 PM
- Posted Re: Displaying and filtering topology error codes in ArcGIS Pro on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 03-23-2025 02:02 PM
- Posted Re: Displaying and filtering topology error codes in ArcGIS Pro on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 03-20-2025 05:07 PM
- Posted Re: Displaying and filtering topology error codes in ArcGIS Pro on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 03-20-2025 02:15 PM
- Posted Displaying and filtering topology error codes in ArcGIS Pro on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 03-20-2025 01:52 PM
- Tagged Displaying and filtering topology error codes in ArcGIS Pro on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 03-20-2025 01:52 PM
- Posted Re: Reporting topology errors on ArcGIS Utility Network Questions. 03-12-2025 04:06 PM
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
05-27-2026
01:21 PM
|