Latest Contributions by Scott_Harris

@JoeBryant1 Regarding your idea for bringing the Last Value method to Attribute Rules, did you see this blog that shows how to simulate the Last Value method?: https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-pro/data-management/simulate-session-attributes-with-attribute-rules-lastvalue And just an FYI regarding feature templates: you mention setting up default values for templates can be cumbersome with a lot of templates, which is true, but did you ever try using the Active Template pane for setting temporary default attributes while creating new features: For example, this value of '88' will be remembered as long as this template remains active:   You can also revert to the default values or save the attributes to a new feature template, if needed:   ... View more

Thanks for the additional context and feedback. The development team will consider enhancing existing tools to accommodate your workflow in a future release.  ... View more

Thanks @bw0093 . It's possible that you are running into this geometry bug in 3.6: https://support.esri.com/en-us/bug/features-are-deleted-when-running-the-split-editing-too-bug-000181708 The status is fixed in the next release. I think it will be also be fixed in the next 3.6 patch (3.6.2). You can contact Esri Technical Support to confirm and track the status. ... View more

@bw0093 do you have an example of the how the input and target geometries look? Are they multipart features? Do they contain donuts/islands? Also, which version of Pro are you using? ... View more

@Stephanie-Ingraldi The Duplicate Vertical and Array tool are expecting something other than an offset of 0. We wanted to prevent cases of unwanted duplicates. As far as getting duplicates, I assume Copy > Paste isn't a desired workflow for you?  For what it's worth, you can click Paste as many times as you need. Maybe you need hundreds of duplicates? ... View more

Hi @ChristyChristensen Here is the page that has the status: https://support.esri.com/en-us/bug/the-split-tool-causes-a-shift-in-vertices-and-polylines-bug-000165171 This page has the definitions of each status https://support.esri.com/en-us/bug-enhancement-request-status The good thing is we haven't seen any cases where the bug wasn't just a visual overlap/gap at scales beyond 1:1. In all the cases reported to us the vertices aren't moving more than the XY tolerance of the dataset. One suggestion is to use a topology with the same tolerance as the data and validate it -  no rules are needed since there is always one implied rule of 'Must Be Larger Than Cluster tolerance'. If you are experiencing gaps overlaps that are larger than the XY tolerance of the data, then please reach out to Esri Technical Support because that would not fall under this bug. ... View more

Hi @BenCobbing1  I see now. I can reproduce it. The development team will investigate it further. If you need to track it, you can contact Esri Technical Support.  If you want to continue editing in a Geographic Coordinate System, try using the combined "Direction and Distance" constraint while sketching and snapping to the edge like this: The direction and distance values will auto populate from the location where you right clicked while snapping to that edge. At that point you can just update to the desired distance value, while leaving the direction value to the value it was populated with. This should result in topologically correct, overlapping lines like you want. ... View more

Hi @BenCobbing1  It sounds like you have constrained the segment to 50m using the Distance constraint and then you are using another constraint. Which one? You said "either the Distance or Direction" constraint. If you choose the Distance constraint, you already did that in step 1. So are you updating the Distance that you already input? If you choose the Distance constraint, as soon as you enter a distance value the segment gets created because it has all the information it needs (Direction plus Distance) which means you will have no chance to snap. I assume you mean you first set the Distance constraint and now you want to manually snap to the edge of the existing line like this: As long as you have the Edge snapping agent on, it should work. If you mean something else entirely, can you please clarify with the steps you are following? Thanks!  ... View more

Hi @SunkubbDev As @AyanPalit suggested, can you please clarify the specific use case that you have for adding a setting to control storing empty strings as "" or null in ArcGIS Pro. We'd like to make sure that there aren't other ways to achieve what you are requesting, since Pro does differ in some ways from ArcMap. ... View more

@CalvinHarmin Yes, that does seem like a valid suggestion to improve the software. Perhaps it's best to include the body of your last comment as a separate idea? - Just to keep the bugs (and the confusion caused by them separate).  ... View more

@CalvinHarmin  Here are some notes from my testing of the latest version of Pro (3.5),  #1 only occurs when there are duplicate domain descriptions, which is a bug https://support.esri.com/en-us/bug/when-accessing-the-attribute-editor-via-the-edit-and-at-bug-000173197 #1 also only occurs for me in the Attributes Pane, not in the table:  #2 sounds like a valid Idea/ENH for the Geodatabase. I would recommend entering a separate Idea for that, with the geodatabase label. Here is a related Idea for adding a GP tool: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/check-for-duplicates-in-coded-value-domain/idi-p/964668 #3 Is a bug, I agree, and could be related to #1 but I will definitely investigate. Since the issues with the Attributes Pane that you describe here are mostly caused by BUG-000173197, I'll close this Idea, as bug should be addressed by Support as a first step.  Please contact them so you can follow the status of BUG-000173197. They can also help determine when the other issue may have been addressed within the Attribute Table (where fields that have duplicate domain descriptions, but have an invalid domain can't be fixed ). ... View more

@SarahKendell Thanks for that additional information. The development team is not aware of this issue, but would like to understand under what conditions it occurs. It would be best to work with Esri Technical Support so they log a defect. My biggest questions are: What coordinate system does the map use? What coordinate system does the point feature class use? What transformation is in use in the map, if any? Feel free send me a direct message with this information if you can. ... View more