|
POST
|
You would set the lifecycle status to Out of Service (LifecycleStatus=0) and then set the construction status to be Abandoned (ConstructionStatus=1) or Removed (ConstructionStatus=2). This seems a little weird at first, but as Mike mentioned it's done to make tracing faster as well as to make it easier to extend the model with your own status values. Many customers will customize their construction status domain with statuses from their own work management or construction design applications. By separating the attributes for controlling tracing (lifecycle status) from the states represented for construction management (construction status) you can customize your status values without needing to worry about how it will affect tracing.
... View more
08-05-2024
11:53 AM
|
1
|
0
|
2970
|
|
POST
|
You can find the definitions of all the error codes in the online help here: Errors—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation Some general resources you can use to get up to speed on the UN for electric: Learn ArcGIS Utility Network for Electric Utilities Here's an article that provides more details about those error numbers specific to the electric industry: Electric Topology Errors For a better overview of the number of errors I recommend running the Summarize Utility Network Errors tool that was included in the utility network foundation project you downloaded (its part of the Utility Data Management Support Tools). The two errors to start with are your type 25 errors (stacked points) and your type 37 errors (subnetwork tap). These are likely responsible for many of your other errors. For the stacked point features, you can't have multiple devices at the same xy location. If these are duplicate features, delete all but the correct feature. If these are devices co-located at a structure, you will need to offset them in your map while still maintaining proper connectivity to lines. For the subnetwork tap errors, those features have a special configuration that restricts how they are allowed to be connected to lines (learn more about subnetwork taps). You can either edit all those features to meet the new drawing requirements or you can remove the subnetwork tap category from them. Doing the latter will limit some of the functionality for those features, but if this is all transmission features you're modeling I wouldn't worry about it too much (subnetwork taps are typically used to handle single phase taps in unbalanced model). Type 25 and type 37 errors will cause the system to also generate a lot of type 8 and 9 errors, so once you cleared up all the 25s and 37s, you'll be in a better place to understand the remaining errors.
... View more
07-31-2024
04:02 PM
|
1
|
1
|
4242
|
|
POST
|
Please log a case with support, this sounds similar to a known bug: BUG-000137206.
... View more
07-30-2024
06:20 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1831
|
|
POST
|
Please log a case with support for this issue. What kind of devices are these? Do they have terminals? Are they barriers (open points, proposed features, etc)?
... View more
07-30-2024
06:07 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1093
|
|
POST
|
The digitized direction of the sewer system will be more reliable since the digitized direction of mains typically indicates flow with respect to gravity. he same can't be said for water, where the system typically operates under pressure and is highly looped. It would be nice if the edges were always drawn to indicate upstream/downstream, but I suspect in many datasets this is not the case. That's my long-winded way of saying I would honor digitized direction for sewer but not for water. Once you create a subnetwork (water treatment plant, wastewater treatment plant) and run update subnetwork, you'll be able to see whether you've flipped any terminals because features will be disconnected. Once you create pressure zones (w) and subbasins (ww) you may find that some of your networks are interconnected (inconsisent subnetwork name) because two pipes share the same terminal on a valve.
... View more
07-26-2024
11:01 AM
|
1
|
1
|
2809
|
|
POST
|
Removing the second rule is a bad idea and you should roll it back immediately. That would connect all the valves to the same port, which means that the flow valves can't control flow and operable valves can't close (because water isn't flowing through them). Take a look at this thread for how to access a tool to populate terminals en masse.
... View more
07-26-2024
08:54 AM
|
1
|
1
|
2853
|
|
POST
|
That will depend on your workflows and user requirements. I recommend you familiarize yourself with the ArcGIS Architecture Center. Start by looking at the network management system reference architecture (especially the design decisions and considerations). You can then look at several test studies that were performed using this reference architecture to see how it performs under different scenarios, and use that to make informed decisions about your own design decisions.
... View more
07-23-2024
01:48 PM
|
2
|
0
|
2598
|
|
POST
|
We don't allow you to make the rules not fire, but you can create 'early exit' conditions that allow the rules to exit before they do any heavy analysis or editing. We have an item on our roadmap to allow you to refine when attribute rules so certain rules will only be triggered when specific fields are edited.
... View more
07-19-2024
09:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2102
|
|
POST
|
@PierreloupDucroix the two classes are the same instance of the same class. The underscore indicates that it is an internal variable that you shouldn't be using. The API does have a certain amount of flexibility with handling different URLs. I have made note of the issue with the documentation and forwarded it to the team responsible for maintaining the online help.
... View more
07-16-2024
06:56 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2805
|
|
POST
|
@PierreloupDucroix You will need to include your condition barriers as part of your trace configuration object and because the trace configuration object in ArcGIS API for Python is a 1:1 match for the rest spec object you need to make sure your key names match the rest spec: conditionBarriers, incluseContainers, etc
... View more
07-15-2024
05:07 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2834
|
|
POST
|
Dirty areas from within your version are posted to default (so we can restitch the areas modified in your version), can you confirm that the unique constraint that is being violated includes global id, gdb_branch_id, and gdb_from_date? If you haven't already opened a support case for this issue, I would recommend you do that (getting a global id constraint error on post is a sign of something not good happening). The app lock error for validation network topology is likely being caused by something else validating/enabling/disabling the network topology in that version. Make sure you don't have any other scripts running or people validating default, wait 15 minutes for the lock to time out, and try again.
... View more
07-13-2024
06:16 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2850
|
|
POST
|
@PierreloupDucroix correct, a geoprocessing service runs within the context of the server and feature service. Does the account you're using to run the geoprocessing services have the correct user type extension? Is the script any better behaved if you use the ArcGIS API for Python instead of ArcPy? ArcPy was originally developed for desktop analysis, so I have noticed that when you need to be precise with service login information in a non-ArcGIS Pro context that the ArcGIS API for Python (which was developed to target AGOL/ArcGIS Enterprise) is more reliable.
... View more
07-13-2024
06:07 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2880
|
|
POST
|
@PierreloupDucroix Does this script work when you run it in a CONDA prompt and fail when you run it in a GP service? I just tested this locally with ArcGIS Pro 3.3 and ArcGIS Enterprise 11.3, and when the logged in user didn't have the ArcGIS Advanced Editing user type extension assigned, I would get this error, but as soon as I assigned it to the user the tool would succeed. I'll wait for confirmation from you before I dig into testing this with a GP service. I agree that the error message can be misleading because it sounds like you're missing the utility network user type extension, when instead the service is saying you're missing the user type extension required for the utility network (which was previously a un user type and is now the advanced user type).
... View more
07-12-2024
07:30 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2920
|
|
POST
|
I do not recommend using SQL statements directly to correct the issue since it can corrupt the history of the database as well as the network index. If you are a customer who is experiencing this issue, please reach out to support for guidance on how to correct the issue. Just deleting, or calculating new global ids, will corrupt the network index (which references features by their global id) and it will also corrupt the history for the feature because every historical reference for the feature will now have a different global id.
... View more
07-03-2024
09:33 AM
|
1
|
0
|
3208
|
|
POST
|
If you look at the same FGDB using ArcGIS Pro 2.9.5 does the data appear correct if you add the data to a new map in ArcGIS Pro? Upgrading your ArcGIS Pro shouldn't affect the data that is stored in the database.
... View more
06-13-2024
07:27 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1448
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thursday | |
| 1 | Thursday | |
| 1 | Tuesday | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
an hour ago
|