Latest Contributions by KoryKramer

@Vandal_WSU did you see Wendy's closing comment here? https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/label-leaders-should-not-cross/idc-p/1053943/highlight/true#M15861 I think the team will need the data (map package with the label settings) so that they can investigate and improve the label placement to avoid crossing leaders. ... View more

Hi @LarsArneson  Thank you for the post.  >> I'm not sure if there is a better place for this to be submitted?  Your suspicion is correct that this should be considered a bug and not an appropriate idea. See the ArcGIS Ideas Submission Guidelines and Statuses As stated there, bugs should be submitted through Technical Support: KoryKramer_0-1672778687998.png Now for the good news - in a development build of ArcGIS Pro 3.1, I see that this problem has been resolved: KoryKramer_1-1672778739969.png We expect 3.1 to be publicly available in late February. Thank you again for taking the time to report this issue.   ... View more

@MokhtarDJ Thank you for submitting this idea. Can you clarify that this is what you're describing? You are using the Select By Attributes geoprocessing tool with the Selection Type set to 'Add to the current selection'. Correct? And instead of the newly selected features (in the example, those where Type = Fluvial Events) being highlighted in the same blue color, you want to specify a different color for those. KoryKramer_0-1672770884113.png Can you provide more details about your workflow and how this functionality would facilitate your work? Once we verify that, we'll need to update this idea's title because 'color choices' does not accurately describe the idea and will not be discoverable to other community members. Thank you. ... View more

Hi Bud, I'm sorry that you're seeing a performance issue in Pro. This is an example where an idea isn't the best path forward. See the ArcGIS Ideas Submission Guidelines and Statuses guidance:  KoryKramer_0-1672759463722.png Depending on what data you are working with, what you're seeing in ArcGIS Pro 3.0.2 may be related to a bug that is already logged with technical support: [BUG-000153703: High RAM consumption and slow performance in ArcGIS Pro when working with a feature service that contains a parcel fabric.] Note that as this issue has been investigated, it appears that it is not limited to parcel fabric data, and may happen when working with any feature service. And from what we're seeing, it looks like your IT department's assessment of this being a memory leak is a reasonable diagnosis. Are you using feature services in Pro when you see the slow down? I'd recommend clicking the Subscribe button on that bug in order to be set up for status update notifications as well as increment the count of affected users. If you are not using feature services, then this will require additional troubleshooting with Technical Support. Thank you! ... View more

>>Is keeping collapsed partitions of windows open also part of this implementation? No >>why are they collapsed by default in the first place? I wasn't part of the design, but giving this some cursory thought, it seems like it would be really annoying if I always had to scroll through a bunch of info that I don't want to look at when I just want to see the Domain, Resolution and Tolerance KoryKramer_0-1671143917258.png   ... View more

What version of Pro are you using? It isn't necessary to apply the filter to see the icons, but of course if you are just interested in Authoritative content, its way faster to filter so that you don't have to scroll through bunch of layers looking for icons.  ... View more

@wayfaringrob can you review https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/export-symbology-classes-to-a-table/idi-p/1237634 submitted by Bud and opine on whether that might satisfy what you're looking for? If so, it would likely make sense to merge these ideas. ... View more

Do you use the available filters? KoryKramer_0-1671136049801.png KoryKramer_1-1671136080592.png   There are filters and indicators in the Add Data experience as well: KoryKramer_2-1671136246424.png Can you please review this information and clarify the idea given the existing functionality? Thank you ... View more

Update @DaveFullerton We'll plan this for 3.2. If you want any way of tracking the work, however, you'll need to submit a separate idea and we'll keep the status updated. Thank you for raising this as an issue that will help your Pro deployment. ... View more

Hi @DaveFullerton It is not already in the works as far as I know, so I'm checking with the team. It never hurts to submit a specific, individual idea as it give you (and us) something to reference, so go ahead and do that if you'd like to track this separately. In that idea, any info you might share about why this needs to be the default for your organization, how many users you deploy Pro to, and so on will be helpful. Thank you! ... View more

Hi @Bud as you noted, this was unfortunately a regression bug as the functionality had been there (as you cited the fact that it was implemented in ArcGIS Pro 2.7 in your original post).  The bug is fixed in Pro 3.1 (planned to be available in late February 2023) as noted on the bug: https://support.esri.com/en/bugs/nimbus/QlVHLTAwMDE1NDI4NA==  We're sorry for the inconvenience, but we'll have this functionality back soon. ... View more

See https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-ideas/make-the-calculate-field-gui-bigger-longer-by/idi-p/1190716  ... View more

Hi @wayfaringrob I agree that the link to the bug is not currently working correctly. I've asked for the Support team to look into that.  The bug is showing as In Product Plan. It did not make it into 3.1, but we will try to get it addressed in 3.2. ... View more

Hi @Bud what is your workflow? i.e. what are you trying to do with the x, y coordinates once extracted from the shape? Because this can be done using Arcade... ... View more

Are you on Pro 2.8 or 2.9? If so, have you installed the corresponding patch that fixes the crash? (i.e. 2.8.8 or 2.9.5) ... View more