Latest Contributions by JamesBurton1

Dealing with this same issue out of no where. I've been publishing elevation layers from drone2map and site scan without issue for months until all the sudden it's making all my elevation layers use meters, even though they are all processing using feet. Tried to publish from multiple locations and it seems that it's an AGOL issue.  ... View more

Very helpful, obviously I didn't look in the item settings. Thank you! Looks like I am at version 1.0 ... View more

Capital Project Planning Solution, would have been more descriptive. The release notes don't have a date. https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-solutions/latest/reference/introduction-to-capital-project-planning.htm ... View more

This Idea is no longer needed. The solution to the ellipsoid to geoid projection not working is the following link. You must have the ArcGIS Coordinate System Data program installed.  https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-drone2map-questions/rtk-ellipsoid-height-to-orthometric-geoid-height/m-p/1328360#M1382 ... View more

I got the image heights tool to work using the elevation source setting, which ends up using WGS84 for the VCS. I had been trying the constant elevation. The constant elevation tool was giving me the wrong values in my images table though.  ... View more

Not much online about this issue. I was using the 3D mensuration tools on my drone2map dsm layer one day, and then the next day the tools are greyed out and won't work. I thought it might be licensing, but I have both the spatial and 3D analyst extensions enabled. Thought it might be because I moved my drone2map license to another user, but the tools still don't work now that I have a d2m license again. I've tried moving the dsm to my local C drive. I've created a new aprx and have the same issue. Seems like a bug at this point. Only thing else I can think to do is uninstall/reinstall Pro, or go to Pro 3.1 and see if that helps.  ... View more

Hey @MarkBarker1, Appreciate the reply, can't attach a PDF in an idea post. I am working with several projects at this point which were flown with RTK corrections from the State of Utah CORS network (TURN). I have processed my data using the default GCS (WGS_1984) and VCS (EGM96 Geoid). I am trying to output my data in PCS:NAD 1983 (2011) State Plane Utah Central Meters and VCS:NAVD88 Height (meters). I continually get an output that is 17 m, give or take, below the orthometric web scenes. I've stopped using the Fixed Images for RTK since it didn't appear to work, and it appears that would force my data to have an offset by using the ellipsoid height.  Beyond that configuration, I have tested other GCS and VCS like the TURN networks (NAD83 (2011)) to try and use an ellipsoidal VCS instead of the EGM96 Geoid. Keep getting this negative vertical offset unless I use ground control.    Feel free to follow up outside this thread. James Burton jburton@msd.utah.gov ... View more

I've been having the same height issue between ellipsoid and geoid heights with our Autel Evo RTK. If I process with ground control it corrects it, but just RTK flights have the offset. Drone2Map documentation talks about a height above ellipsoid setting, but I don't think it's still present in the latest release. I guess I need to look into modifying my EXIF data to account for that difference. There is an image heights setting, but I've been having trouble getting it to work. ... View more

Do you mean the Site Scan flight app? Not sure why you couldn't process your Mavic 3 photos through Drone2Map.  ... View more

Looking for this widget right now. If you don't have site scan, is there any other way to measure volume in a web app?  ... View more

Hey Mark, I was including control points with RTK images, which I learned from you and the drone2map documentation, can create too much constraint. I've run this same job without control, and still find my images being adjusted. My check points are all 7cm or less, so I'm happy with the results, but I still don't know why my images are being adjusted. I'm checking Fix Image location for High Accuracy GPS. See the attached processing report.  Thanks, James Burton ... View more