|
POST
|
Well, some good news regarding that type of curve... At ArcGIS Pro 3.3 we have enhanced the Merge Collinear Lines tool to work with curves. I selected those lines and ran the GP tool on them and it created a curve Only problem is you'll have to wait just a bit until 3.3 comes out in order to use the tool with the new functionality.
... View more
04-18-2024
05:30 PM
|
2
|
0
|
1628
|
|
POST
|
Unfortunately, you will have to manually change it as we can't embed or control the Ground to Grid other than what I showed above, via a step in a Task. We will look into making this more accessible via Tasks in the future.
... View more
04-18-2024
05:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1378
|
|
BLOG
|
Keep my power a secret! I can edit code psychically through space and time and I can fix bugs through the cosmos 🙂
... View more
04-18-2024
04:28 PM
|
3
|
0
|
3245
|
|
POST
|
@RobertChaney Ah interesting. I ran the delete identical on your data you provided me right now with SHAPE only. I looked for a curve and luckily there was one and it has one curve that is still overlapping after. I used the tool Highlight Gaps and Overlaps tool available on the Quality Tab in Pro I notice there are alot of gaps and overlaps along these curves Zooming to that curve that has the duplicate lines you'll notice there is a gap between the parcels so the lines technically aren't overlapping. Examining that ArcMap Fabric these gaps and overlaps are all present there too. I took a look at one of the areas where there are yellow gaps at the top and I noticed the parcel polygon geometry wasn't true curves along the line, they were still densified arcs. I toggled on the Parcels Vertices layer and can see there are alot of extra verticies on the polygon. So what I did to fix this selected all the parcels in the cul-de-sac and clicked Shrink To Seed Once they were shrunk to seed I manually selected one of those 'duplicate lines' and deleted it I then ran Reconstruct From Seeds which rebuilt all those parcels I shrunk to seed (note: nothing happened to any of the attributes of that parcel) I ran the Highlight Gaps and Overlaps tool again and everything was all fixed. No more gaps or densified arcs on the polygons.
... View more
04-18-2024
04:16 PM
|
1
|
2
|
1633
|
|
BLOG
|
Hey@RickHollatz I ran the script multiple times with a COGO line feature class that is participating in a topology and I was not able to reproduce the error. Would you be able to send me a sample of your data so I could test it out?
... View more
04-18-2024
03:04 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3256
|
|
POST
|
Hey @RobertChaney So I did some investigating of the data and here is what I found. It doesn't look like the Distance rounding is the primary culprit. It looks like it's the Direction field. Let me start with what I think might be path forward for your data then I'll get into the nitty gritty of what is happening behind the scenes. I would suggest not running the Delete Identical option during the Upgrade. Instead, run it manually after upgrade is complete. The Upgrade ArcMap tool simply runs the GP Delete Identical so running it after will be basically the same except you can control the fields it uses to compare more specifically. If you do not care about the Direction and Distance field values, you can just run the Delete Identical tool and use SHAPE as the field it checks against. However, if you are concerned about the Distance fields you can run the delete identical against: SHAPE, DISTANCE, ARCLENGTH, and even CREATEDBYRECORD. However you might need to round your distance fields to a lower decimal place, and if you don't want to modify the surveyed data you can create a new field and compute the Distance values over there and round the values in that field. Then use that newly created field in the Delete Identical. Let me know if that will be a good workflow for you! Ok... now for some nerdy numbers... When looking at the Direction field I noticed the decimal values went over 10 places. And during the Upgrade ArcMap tool what happens if you choose to Delete Identical is that I will create two new fields; one that stores the Direction field minus 180 if it's a angle that is greater than 180 and two a distance field that is rounded to 4 decimal places. I then use those two fields, plus the CREATEDBYRECORD, RETIREDBYRECORD and SHAPE field in the parameter for Delete Identical. With that being said looking at the Direction Field, rounding to 6 decimal places the values still differed between the two lines. Use these lines as an example You can see on the left the UpgradeDirectionMinus180 fields differ between the two lines. And the Direction values that are stored have huge precision. Seeing this makes me think that these full raw values aren't necessarily important to you so running Delete Identical simply against the shape of the line features might be a viable option for you. Hopefully all this makes some sense. Let me know if you have any other questions.
... View more
04-17-2024
03:40 PM
|
1
|
4
|
3831
|
|
POST
|
In ArcMap there is a GP Tool called Copy Parcel Fabric https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/parcel-fabric-toolbox/copy-parcels.htm You can select some parcels and run this tool. Then send me that FGDB with the newly copied parcel fabric.
... View more
04-16-2024
03:10 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2237
|
|
POST
|
Is there a way you could send me a small subset of your data so I can run it on my end? I can take a look.
... View more
04-16-2024
02:03 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2239
|
|
POST
|
That is correct that the GP Script tool doesn't look at map properties for field formatting as the tool can be run without any maps open. One other thing you can do is modify the script. Here are the steps: 1. Go to your Pro install location and browse to this fodler: C:\Program Files\ArcGIS\Pro\Resources\ArcToolBox\Scripts Then find the FabricForArcMapToArcGISPro.py file 2. Copy that file to another location, like your desktop. 3. Right click on the file and Open it with Notepad or any other editor of your choice. 4. Once the file is open scroll all the way to the bottom and you will find a variable called IDENTICAL_ROUND_VALUE. It is currently set to 4. Change the 4 to what ever rounding value you decide 5. Save you changes and close the editor 6. Copy and paste the .py file back to the original directory in step one and overwrite the existing file. Let me know how this works out for you.
... View more
04-11-2024
10:39 AM
|
0
|
3
|
2298
|
|
POST
|
@RobertChaneyYou could always run Delete Identical on each of the Lines layer after the Upgrade is complete. The Upgrade Tool runs that GP tool during that stage of the upgrade. You can configure the parameters however you want in this case.
... View more
04-10-2024
04:44 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2358
|
|
POST
|
Oh I did notice one other thing, if I record a step that just calls the Interactive tool (like I did in the 2nd step above) and G2G is OFF. If I run that step and calculate the Ground to Grid Direction offset and distance factor by the grid line then it will automatically turn ON G2G. So in theory you can just record that command and the tool will always be on.
... View more
03-28-2024
02:28 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1473
|
|
POST
|
Hello @CameronLacelle , I did some testing and here are some ways you can incorporate Ground to Grid in Tasks. I noticed that when I recorded the Ground to Grid command as a step it basically just reacted as toggle to turn on/off Ground to Grid. However, if I recorded the the button in the Ground to Grid window I was able to call that tool to draw the grid line. So after recording that I had a step that when I pressed RUN the Ground to Grid heads up display appeared where I can start computing the Ground to Grid based drawing a grid line. I do understand that it would also be good to have this a toggle option on a step by step basis. Because I did notice that recording the Ground to Grid tool in step one, if the tool was already on it would turn it off. THere's no way to say turn G2G on or turn G2G off. It's a simple toggle. We will look into enhancing this for a future release. Let me know if the steps above are helpful. Thanks!
... View more
03-28-2024
02:23 PM
|
1
|
4
|
1474
|
|
POST
|
Hello Drew, If you haven't gotten to far after the Migrate tool maybe I could make a suggestion. Go back to the ArcMap Parcel Fabric and do field calculations on the TYPE field for the Parcels to reduce the size of Parcel Types created. The Upgrade ArcMap Parcel Fabric GP tool parses through the TYPE field of the parcels to determine what Parcel Types are created. So if in the ArcMap Fabric you had the type "LotA", "LotB", "LotC", if you did a field calc to change all the "LotB" and "LotC" to "LotA" then ran the Upgrade tool again you will now have all those parcels sent to the one "LotA" parcel type. Let me know if that makes sense. Thanks, Jason Camerano
... View more
02-01-2024
01:25 PM
|
2
|
0
|
1095
|
|
POST
|
Hello again, it's been a while, but here's another Parcel Fabric 2Torial. In this quick 2(ish) minute tutorial we will showcase different methods to achieve ground to grid corrections. You will see changing the map projection on the fly as well as using the Ground to Grid editor tool. I hope you find this video helpful and make sure to click the links at the bottom of this post for more information! Here are some helpful links with more information: Use ground to grid corrections (Editing Doc) Setting a ground to grid to grid correction (Parcels Doc) Projection on the fly and geographic transformations (Blog) Create a parcel traverse And for those who are bringing in CAD files that are in modified projections, check out this awesome tool developed by @TimHodson that will transform the CAD layer by entering a scale factor, rotation, local coordinates and corresponding grid coordinates. Transform CAD Layers in ArcGIS Pro
... View more
01-30-2024
12:25 PM
|
4
|
0
|
1483
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 12-12-2025 04:16 PM | |
| 1 | 11-18-2025 01:24 PM | |
| 1 | 02-05-2025 01:15 PM | |
| 1 | 06-25-2024 03:30 PM | |
| 1 | 09-24-2025 04:07 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
4 weeks ago
|