Latest Contributions by JasonCamerano

‎12-01-2015

Great question. Currently we are looking into a solution for this problem as the Task Pane takes focus away from the active view causing issues with Copy and Paste. At the moment the only work around is to instruct the user to manually right click + copy and right click + paste.

‎10-17-2014

For a single parcel there should only be one area where Origin Connection lines exist. You can have multiple Origin Connection lines that follow a linear path to the POB, but elsewhere in the parcel there should be no other Origin Connection Lines. All other tie lines should be Connection lines. Here are a couple links that might be helpful to better answer your questions: ArcGIS Help (10.2, 10.2.1, and 10.2.2) , ArcGIS Help (10.2, 10.2.1, and 10.2.2)

‎10-16-2014

The best approach to entering a mutli-part parcel with an origin connection is as follows: New Parcel Start with the Origin Connection to the point of beginning (POB) From the POB continue to COGO your parcel When it's time to move to the other portion of the parcel, create a Part Connector line that spans across the road. (This is Category value 7 in the Category field) Finish COGO'ing your other portion of the subdivision. If you have already created the multipart and merged the parcel and want to re-add the Origin Connection: Open the Parcel Create the origin connection line (it will be going the wrong direction for now) For each segment of the Origin Connection, switch the To and From points; For example if the line was FROM 5 TO 13 change it to the following: FROM 13 to 5. Lastly, for each segment (individually, this wont work as a batch), select the row and choose REVERSE BEARING from the context menu. To answer your other questions: Yes, missing the origin connection lines can affect the LSA if it is not included in the adjustment. If you were to select the original historic parcel then you would be fine. You alternative solution can work but you won't get the benefit of having a single parcel for the multipart.

‎11-29-2011

Yes, a good way to think about it is + is going Clockwise direction - is going Counter-clockwise direction

‎11-29-2011

You can set up a domain on the Geodatabase to match your custom types and assign that Domain to the Type field of Lines. From there you can then Symbolize the Lines Fabric sublayer to the Type field and then it will be represented in the map. If you are looking to import this from source data you can add a field to the Fabric prior to the import and name it the exact same name as your "representation" field on your source data and also make sure the new field is the same type as your "representation" field. Once you import the data all your data will be carried across. If you have further questions or if you want more information on how to preform these steps I have listed please let me know. You can also email me: [email protected] for a faster response.

‎08-23-2011

Both workflows seem to have the same results so it would be basically up to you which one you want to choose. I was a little thrown off with the word "linestring" because that is a separate tool. I assume you are referring to the Segmented Line Tool correct? Using the Segmented Line Tool will just create 4 proportionally equal segments on the line. If you want a more precise break-point I would recommend using the Breakline tool. Otherwise, the Segmented Line Tool works fine.

‎06-22-2011

Hey Dan, What directory is the Backup in. It might have been removed already... If you re-upload it send me an email: [email protected] and I will pull it immediately.

‎06-09-2011

Maybe a backup of the GDB might work. What are you running on? SQL Server? Here are the instructions to load files on to our FTP site if you want to use that. However, this site isn't secure so if there is anything sensitive I wouldn't recommend loading it: External users who need to FTP a file to Esri should be instructed to login to ftp://ftp.esri.com/ as " anonymous " using their e-mail address as the password and to navigate to the /pub/incoming directory. They can then put files in that directory. The file will be deleted in 2 business days.

‎06-08-2011

Sorry for the delayed response. Would you happen to have any data that we can use to reproduce this? We have not been able to reproduce this in house. Is this still happening frequently?

‎03-25-2011

You can have multiple annotation layers. Right click on the parcel sublayer of the fabric and click Convert Labels to Annotation. I believe that is what you are asking, correct?

‎03-22-2011

We are looking into this issue.

‎03-22-2011

This issue has been addressed and will be fixed with Service Pack 2.

‎03-22-2011

If you set the accuracy on the parcel each line will inherit that accuracy level if left blank. So in other words, you do not have to set the accuracy of the lines if you want them to be the same as the parcel's accuracy. If you want to change the accuracy of a given line to make it higher or lower than that of the parcel, you will have to manually set that. Also, if you are digitizing the line, the accuracy will get automatically set to 6. On a similar note, if you do not set the accuracy of the parcel the parcel will inherit the accuracy from the plan, as will the lines. This is useful when doing a construction since the Properties tab isn't available. You can leave the lines accuracy blank if you want each line to inherit the same accuracy as the plan.

‎03-21-2011

1. Not sure the workflow you are looking for but if you are wanting to take existing parcels that reside within the fabric and turn them into lots/subdivisions you can select them all and do a Construct From Parent and just change the Template type from Tax Parcel to Lot and do any manual editing of any of the existing lines, then just build and keep current. However, if you have all this data maintained across multiple fabrics you can save sets of parcels out as XML files and then append them in a new fabric. I guess I would need a little more info of your current data state. (Also, the tutorial data isn't multiple fabrics. All those lots, tax, and subdivision parcels are all maintained in the same fabric) 2. Labels can be turned on and off on a layer by layer basis. 3. Maybe with this one something is screwed up in the template settings. Can I get some more info with this? Are you saying every time you start a new parcel /construction it is set to 3 Connection? Is there a template set to the line? etc.

‎12-15-2010

I had similar issues as well. I contacted Systems here at the ESRI offices and these were the steps taken to resolve the issue: 1. Set SQL Server Authentication mode to mixed mode (Windows and SQL Server authentication) 2. Enable tcp/ip and named pipe protocols for SQL Server 3. Add the sde SQL Server authentication account to the db_owner database role in the sde database 4. Restart SQL Server service 5. Verify you can connect to the SQL Server instance using the sde SQL Server authentication account 6. Re-attempt the post install

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	yesterday

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by JasonCamerano

Re: Trying to make a task to copy and paste a feature

Re: Multi-Part Subdivisions

Re: Multi-Part Subdivisions

Re: COGO in the Fabric

Re: Parcel Fabric and Representations

Re: Construct from parent: Linestring vs Breakline tool

Re: "Null z value/empty geometry" error when reconciling

Re: "Null z value/empty geometry" error when reconciling

Re: "Null z value/empty geometry" error when reconciling

Re: Parcel Editor - Workflow between parcels, lots, subdivisions

Re: "Null z value/empty geometry" error when reconciling

Re: Creating a new Plan through Merge dialog makes Construction not work.

Re: Accuracy level in fabric?

Re: Parcel Editor - Workflow between parcels, lots, subdivisions

Re: Connection to database 'xxxxx' failed Error creating ArcSDE direct connection (-9

UC 2026 Parcel Fabric Social Hosted by Sidwell!

Parcel Fabric 2torial - New Enhancements to Tasks

MeetUp: Parcel Fabric What's New In ArcGIS Pro 3.7

Re: MeetUp: Parcel Fabric What's New In ArcGIS Pro...

MeetUp: Miami-Dade County’s Leap into Parcel Moder...