POST
|
I don't know if this is just a default quirk with how ArcGIS Pro handles Legends (which has been a big improvement over ArcMap so far) But one thing that's been bugging me and I've been looking for a way to change is to keep all symbol swatches/labels that fall under a single layer from appearing inline with the Layer Name when fitting the Legend to a strip. An example of what I'm talking about in the legend below: All of the point swatches are part of the same layer - however, I don't like that when "squishing" the legend down it moves the next item after the break to appear inline with the Layer Name. I would much prefer it if the item after the break, (in this case Herb Robert) appeared inline with the first swatch instead (Knotweed Species). i.e. fitting all symbol swatches/labels below the red line in the image below: Does anyone know a way in the Legend settings to get what I'm attempting? Besides just converting the legend to a graphics item that is . . . Thanks!
... View more
02-23-2022
10:01 AM
|
0
|
2
|
553
|
POST
|
Thank you for the input, Derrick - exactly what I was looking for. Will be having a meeting with our field teams to see which method is preferred out there. I assume there's no way to use both methods in the same Survey?
... View more
02-01-2022
09:25 AM
|
1
|
2
|
1632
|
POST
|
Hi there, We've used Survey123 for a long time in our organization and I typically publish new forms at the beginning of every year. Typically we would have Survey123Forms for POlygon records that would allow users to enter a polygon Vertex-by-Vertex. However, after this most recent publish (I design the Surveys is Survey123Connect). The input types were only: A general "shape" sketch which would automatically create a Circle, Square, or Triangle based on the shape of the Sketch Freehand Sketch Is there a location to customize how these Forms receive their shape input? I'd like to be able to add, or replace the general "shape" sketch with the vertex-by-vertex entry. Unsure if the new etnry options are a result of recent update or not. Thank you!
... View more
01-27-2022
03:59 PM
|
0
|
4
|
1700
|
POST
|
Hi, Doing some metadata editing, I had links to an email account for receiving queries in the Description and Use Limitation sections for metadata on a number of items. I typically write the url link as: "mailto:address@place.org" (without quotes) The hyperlink appears for the text intended, and clicking it opens a new email message - however the 'To' intended recipient adress in the message has a ":25" appended so it fails to send correctly. Has anyone else encountered this and knows of a solution? Should I add some more formatting in the url link to try to rectify? Thanks!
... View more
12-16-2021
01:30 PM
|
4
|
1
|
376
|
POST
|
Thanks for the input, @jcarlson. Having just one item in the Portal is a definite goal to streamline things a little better. You bring up an interesting point about Relationship classes. Each one has and is intended to carry forward at most two photo attachments. I'm hoping with the existing GlobalIDs if I were to import the three feature classes to the same .GDB there wouldn't be any conflict or confusion about which which feature class has which related atttachments?
... View more
12-14-2021
03:11 PM
|
0
|
0
|
768
|
POST
|
Hi all, Typically around the end of the year I like to reasses our organization's field data collection layers for improvements, schema changes, etc. We used to have a cloud-based Enterprise system that had a EGDB with feature datasets which had each geometry type in it. We had some trouble with that and our field tools so we started using Hosted Feature Services for each geometry.. I transitioned to doing everything in ArcGIS Online this year (for cost and other reasons). We have in the past used hosted feature services to collect data in. We would have one for polygon geometry, one for line geometry, one for point geometry, all with generally the same fields/domains. However, these had been independently uploaded as a separate feature service for each geometry. I'm wondering if it may be more prudent once I've finalized any schema changes to upload the new datasets with each geometry type into the same Hosted Feature Service. So store them in one GDB, publish as one Hosted Feature Service that has Point, Polygon, and Line geometry. Different Hosted Feature Services for AGO can do this with the Build A Layer options, or it could be published from ArcGIS Pro/ArcMap. Anyway, just wondering what others have done and their experience with this type of dataset organization. We like to use Survey123 to do field data collection, so ideally I'd like to be able to point Surveys to each different geometry type in the same feature service if possible, one form for each geomatery. Thanks!
... View more
12-14-2021
02:51 PM
|
0
|
2
|
787
|
POST
|
Hi, You may have more success editing the domain list via JSON from the REST endpoint as explained in this article: How To: Add coded value domains to a hosted feature service from a REST endpoint (esri.com) Just be sure to do it during downtime and save a json of the unedited service before you do so. I've since transitioned my organization away from an Enterprise and Portal deployment to totally hosting in ArcGIS Online, which allows easier updates to the Domain values than what I had to content with in Enterprise - but I remember using the REST endpoint to edit coded domain values succesfully. Worked sometimes, didn't work others.
... View more
12-10-2021
10:01 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2564
|
POST
|
I did try setting the symbology settings and it did populate for one field's domains, but not both. When I tried setting the symbology to use two fields (species, and density). It only popualted symbols for those rows that had data already. I ended up just creating some bum featrues for each species and density class combo and then assigning the symbology once those rows were filled.
... View more
12-06-2021
11:36 AM
|
0
|
0
|
828
|
POST
|
Hi, I'm trying to set up an empty layer for creating a set of features that use two values, a Species field and a Density Class field. I've created a series of Domains that I would like the Feature Template to use when creating new features. However, I'm having trouble finding how exactly to assign these values to templates. It seems to only register values that exist in the data, and the feature class doesn't have records that contain that data yet. I can manually create a new Template and assign the specific fields and values I would like that template to use, but can't seem to find where to change the Drawing Symbol. Any guidance would be much appreciated.
... View more
12-01-2021
03:40 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1118
|
POST
|
Drat! Thanks for the update, shame it's no longer supported. I will happily kudo your Idea post.
... View more
11-02-2021
11:09 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1604
|
POST
|
Hi David, here's some screenshots and more details about the model I'm attempting. First, the Iteration parameters, with the Hosted Feature Layer as Input and the Name field: Second, the output parameters from the shapefile to feature class tool And here's just the general model overview Thanks!
... View more
10-25-2021
01:13 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1623
|
POST
|
Hi all, I'm trying to get some good use out of the Iterator tool in ModelBuilder and set up some processes to simplify my workflow - and am just having a bit of trouble getting the logic right on my process. My ultimate goal is to: iterate through one of our Hosted Feature Services in AGOL of watersheds select each one by its respective Name (using the Name field in the Group By Fields parameter) For each selected watershed, use select by location to capture points from a separate subset of data that fall within the watershed's boundaries Export the attribute table of the select by location output to an Excel Sheet. So I can ultimately create a table that has the attribute table of all those features within each watershed. To test that my iterator is selecting things properly I'd thought I'd set the output selection connected to the Feature Class to Shapefile tool to see if I can at least get an independent shapefile of each selected watershed from the iterator. However, I only end up with a single output shapefile which doesn't contain the name of the watershed from the Name field - just "I_0_Name". I've tried setting the output location to use the inline variable "%Value%" but I still only get one shapefile in the output with the name having "%Value%" as a string in the name - not the actual name of the selected feature. I'm definitely missing something or misunderstanding the purpose of the Iterate Feature Selection tool - if that tool can't accomplish what I'm considering, is there another tool that would work better? Thanks!
... View more
10-21-2021
12:14 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1690
|
POST
|
Hi Leila, Just confirming that the exact thing is happening to me. I checked the same Hosted Feature Service in Pro and the iframe displays the linked content correctly there - but continues to only display the iframe text when opened in pop-up in Web Viewer Classic (and is totally blank in the New Map Viewer) In this case I'm linking to an interactive panorama hosted via imgur. I haven't been able to find an active bug case for this issue.
... View more
10-19-2021
05:21 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1661
|
POST
|
Still seeing the failed downloads in Collector and Field Maps on a wholly ArcGIS Online setup. Slightly more reliable, but barely. Some of my Feature Layers I intend to use on the offline maps comes from a variety of sources, several are added through GIS data provided to the public by state and federal entities that I re-publish as Hosted Feature Layers to our organization, others are published to AGO via ArcMap or ArcGIS Pro, some created from AGO directly. I guess if there's some incongruity between data sources, projections, and schema it probably adds to the difficulties - however I need a lot of those reference layers. I can try providing a detailed basemap as that has helped reduce download size and result in more reliable successes but most of my field users expect some degree of interactivity with the provided reference data, so I can only do that with the aerial imagery basemap.
... View more
10-19-2021
11:41 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1290
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 02-17-2023 11:12 AM | |
1 | 03-27-2024 12:42 PM | |
1 | 11-02-2021 11:09 AM | |
1 | 10-19-2021 05:21 PM | |
1 | 09-20-2021 09:47 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
06-22-2024
04:51 PM
|