Latest Contributions by DavidColey

‎08-29-2022

Hello - Is this happening on trying to upgrade the hosting site or a federated site (if distributed)? Did you make sure that all of your Content and Services directories are enabled and all the site admin accounts are enabled? I did experience an issue where server did not complete an upgrade at an older 10.x to 10.x.something because the web adaptor did not completely unregister from server after it was un-installed from our web server machine. I do not recall the specific step it failed on, but it was probably past this step 2. But once the web adaptor was completely unregistered from Server Admin, the upgrade completed. At the 10.9 to 10.9.1 upgrade, I did have to modify the pg_hba.config file: # TYPE DATABASE USER ADDRESS METHOD host all all ::1/128 scram-sha-256 to handle the additional encryption method. Lastly, did you try not using localhost in the manager url but/and/or machinename:6443 or DNSname:6443 ? To me, Soc's crashing sounds like a windows arcserver service account permissions thing . . . @Cory_Ott @KurtisGagne1 @JonEmch

‎08-29-2022

Hi Jamal - pretty sure this is by design. You have to edit a branch feature through a feature access connection after the layer(s) have been published to portal

‎08-11-2022

ok thanks again for the reply @ShanaBritt . If I get a chance to replicate my directory structure on another machine that has 2.9.x installed, I will try,

‎08-11-2022

Thanks for the reply @ShanaBritt Yes sadly, I thought I had recreated 2 of 3 locators but in fact 2 were still 10.x (*.loc, *.loc.xml, *.lox). After re-creating the locators as 2.9 (*.loc, *.loz) style locators in the same file location and with the same name, the project at 3.0 will open without the 'Invalid Locator' message. However, even after removing the updated file-based locators from the 3.0 project, upon a locator 'refresh' from the catalog pane, the file-based locators are re-added to the project, suggesting to me they are never actually removed from the aprx. As you note, they would have had to have been removed at 2.9. Maybe a 3.1 patch will fix this. For me, I am using this as an opportunity to re-create new, clean 3.0 pro projects in a new directory location and then migrating data, folders, styles, etc. I am isolating my pro project used to create my address locators in an entirely separate location (separate from the home location). - hopefully this will keep things cleaner.

‎08-05-2022

Hi @ShanaBritt - I can confirm this is still an issue at 3. Here's a post I put up yesterday: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/arcgis-pro-3-0-won-t-remove-locators-from-project/m-p/1199409#M58176 It does turn out I do have 2 10.x address locator services being referenced in the project and I am working to delete those from enterprise and server. We'll see how it goes. @JoeBorgione @EricAnderson17

‎08-04-2022

Hello - I keep removing locator files\objects that no longer exist (the ones that show a red !) from the Catalog pane in Pro 3.0 by right-click>remove from project. But the locator files keep re-appearing no matter how many times I remove them. As a result, every time I try to switch to another project without exiting Pro first, I get an 'Invalid Locator' warning box that will not close no matter how many times I click it forcing a shutdown of Pro from Task Manager: DavidColey_0-1659625018486.png

‎08-01-2022

Hello - This has occurred in the past: We push hosted layers to both ArcGIS Online and to Portal (10.9.1). We use State Plane HARN (wkid 2882) and allow Online and Portal to just handle the transformation. With the June 2022 Update, it appears that the transformation 'NAD 1983 HARN To WGS 1984 2' is not being honored: DavidColey_0-1659380143818.png The 'ParcelHosted' layer is a parcel layer hosted directly to AGOL. It is the layer with the blue fill and orange outline. The 'Parcels' layer is a parcel layer hosted to our Portal, and then sent to AGOL via collaboration. It is the layer with yellow fill and black outline. The shift is on average about 3 feet, which is what I would expect if a transformation isn't being handled again. Something similar occurred here: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-online-questions/map-viewer-classic-and-map-viewer-layer-alignment/m-p/1055382/highlight/true#M39929 And it turned out that at Pro 2.7.3 an 'Additional Transformation' was need in the Pro map, even if just sharing a single layer from an sd file. That does not appear to be the case here, since the 'additional transformation' is still in my maps at pro 2.9.3. (soon to be pro 3.x). Maybe you've seen this @jcarlson ?

‎07-29-2022

update Our EIT security disabled github access for administrative accounts. since I always work using my admin account, the client install could not access any of the node_modules. switching to a non-admin account and re-running the client npm ci then did complete it's install, albeit with the same visual studio dependency errors....

‎07-29-2022

So I know this is frustrating bringing this back up, but at version 1.9 client install problems still exist. For me, the entire /client/node_modules directory did not install with the npm ci, as with version 1.8. I am copying my node_modules directory from my 1.7 install. Then we'll see what fails I suppose. @esride-nik @RobertScheitlin__GISP @babarsac

‎07-25-2022

Thank you for this @ChristopherPawlyszyn - I had thought I had seen this documentation but some missed it again....

‎07-25-2022

I believe I read in the documentation from a few releases ago that 16 map pages was a limit.... - David

‎07-22-2022

Hello - with the release of Enterprise 11, can a federated site remain at a lower release as with past Enterprise releases? I plan to upgrade portal, the hosting site and the data stores but I need to leave a federated site at 10.9.1 until I completely migrate off of an ArcMap authored service that is running a geometric network. Thanks David

‎07-21-2022

Hello @Anonymous User - I realize this topic is a bit dated, but when you say "we are a few weeks away from releasing a draft publishing flow in Hub Sites" - can you direct me to that resource? I can't seem to locate a "draft publishing flow" such that I too can clone our site without having to configure a new core team and content groups. We send a lot of data to our site via distributed collaborations and this will be a real time saver. @ChaseBarnard Thanks, David

‎07-19-2022

Thank you for the feedback @ShengdiZhang . Sorry for the late reply on this. Yes, I am able to return the same popup info result into a feature info widget from a feature layer source within the same map. I believe what I was missing was the Search action trigger for 'Data Filtering Changes' so I can zoom and pan to the feature in my map. This works fine for a single-source feature layer and a single feature info widget to hold the results. Still, I suppose what I am asking is the capability or flexibility for the Search to interact with the webmap popup. In this way, more feature layer sources can be added to the Search without having to define separate Feature Info widgets as containers to hold the popup info results. Much like the current Web Application Builder does now.

‎07-12-2022

Does anyone have an estimate for when the search widget will be able to return info from a feature layer source in either the map widget popup or maybe the feature info widget? Seems like this is something that is still really needed. Thanks, David

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	Tuesday

My Ideas

Latest Contributions by DavidColey

Re: Error Upgrading ArcGIS Server from 10.9.1 to 11: ArcGIS Server upgrade step 2 of 2: Failed. Refresh auto-deployed services during upgrade

Re: ArcGIS Enterprise (ArcGIS Pro 3.0.1): Why versioned feature classes with “branch” type get uneditable?

Re: ArcGIS Pro 3.0 won't remove locators from project

Re: ArcGIS Pro 3.0 won't remove locators from project

Re: Unable to remove Locators in Pro

ArcGIS Pro 3.0 won't remove locators from project

Hosted feature layers - transformation issue between online map viewer and portal 10.9.1 map viewer

Re: Version 1.8 of Experience Builder Developer Edition is Now Available

Re: Version 1.8 of Experience Builder Developer Edition is Now Available

Re: ArcEnterprise 11 and Federated Sites: Can a federated site remain at 10.9.1?

Re: Experience Builder - Embedding apps within a larger app

ArcEnterprise 11 and Federated Sites: Can a federated site remain at 10.9.1?

Re: Clone and Replace a Hub Site

Re: Search widget and Feature Layer Info Results return?

Search widget and Feature Layer Info Results return?

Re: Members no longer showing in their assigned me...

Re: Experience Builder>Filter>Is any of filter typ...

Re: Get an Early Look at What's Next in ArcGIS Onl...

Re: Validate Network Topology Fails ArcGIS Pro 3.7...

Re: ArcGIS Data Store upgrade 11.5 to 12.1 fails

Experience Builder Custom Widgets

Experience Builder Tips and Tricks

Web AppBuilder Custom Widgets

ArcGIS Server with JavaScript API