|
POST
|
I tried the link, but no luck! This weekend the idea site is down for maintenance. Just go and search through Ideas.arcgis.com for Reader.
... View more
03-19-2011
07:33 PM
|
0
|
0
|
901
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for providing the screenshot. However, It is hard to tell from the screenshot if it is a legitimate error or not. The red area indicates an error. Please confirm the following: 1. Did you install Esri Production Mapping 10 or ArcGIS Data Reviewer 10? 2. What is the build number for Esri Production Mapping 10 or ArcGIS Data Reviewer 10? 3. Can you send a screenshot of your Polygon Sliver Check Properties dialog? 4. Can you attach the data? I am stepping in here, briefly, but will refer back to Devin for the issue, and his response. Data Reviewer 10 SP1. How do we find the build number, if only Reviewer is installed? Screenshot to follow, and data is there, already.
... View more
03-08-2011
01:41 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4044
|
|
POST
|
Search is now working, perhaps it was related to chrome dev. Just updated to latest release, and now I can search.
... View more
03-03-2011
04:25 PM
|
0
|
0
|
830
|
|
POST
|
So, I at least got something, but now its telling me that my security policy may be the issue, so why can I access the same services via ArcGIS.com I can see My Services from ArcGIS.com, but still get the security policy issue. It seems like I should be able to add my local services to explorer, rather than going to ArcGIS.com, add services, then see them show up in the My Services.
... View more
03-03-2011
03:03 PM
|
0
|
0
|
830
|
|
POST
|
I am able to add a local server to ArcGIS.com, but I am not able to do the same for explorer.arcgis.com. Like the new interface, btw, well so far, like the animations. Seems like there should be a drop down for local server, like what we see for the web Maps, instead of just one text box. Also, having issues with Searching, which I am now investigating.
... View more
03-03-2011
02:59 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1314
|
|
POST
|
What do you mean by even? Oops, sorry about that, needed a comma I think on your part between even and if. lol
... View more
02-24-2011
02:12 PM
|
0
|
0
|
798
|
|
POST
|
Yes, I have that selected, I wonder if it is related to Win XP 64, I will be testing the rules again but on a 32 bit machine, for some new checks for a new workflow, so it really just needs to work for the 32 bit machines, since there is only 1 64 bit machine (mine 🙂 )
... View more
02-24-2011
02:04 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1487
|
|
POST
|
Good to know, now if the issue could be resolved where Validate messes with Anno, then this would be the easiest path to switch connections.
... View more
02-22-2011
01:18 PM
|
0
|
0
|
726
|
|
POST
|
What is the best workflow when defining batch jobs? Mine was create version, create checks, save batch file, but then my checks are still tied to my version, which was really just setup for defining rbj files. Is there a better way to do this, or is this about right?
... View more
02-15-2011
05:30 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2035
|
|
POST
|
I am not able to reproduce this issue with Batch validate in Production Mapping 10 SP1, I request you to please confirm the following: 1. Is the batch job created in Production Mapping 10 SP1? 2. What are the checks present in batch job? 3. What happened if you create a sample batch job with just one check and compare the result with the similar check in single mode? 4. Are you using the "Always Execute" option available in the Reviewer Session Manager? 5. Is this issue reproducible with sample data? Regards, Kumar 1 and 2. Batch Built in SP1 10, ahh Checks, see attached. 3. I will try this next week, I am in Holistic this week. 4. I turned this off, since I was checking for Invalids anyway, it seemed a bit redundant 5. I have sample data, here: http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=dc09af5412c240d7ac836e81272a8714 Layers underneath County of Riverside, except Parcel Anno
... View more
02-15-2011
05:26 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1487
|
|
POST
|
We are checking subtypes, too, but yeah this was a funky issue, not huge for us since we are reviewing at the book level, and I am going through slowly but surely and calcing blanks to NULL just ahead of the Reviewer, this happened to be an area I had not visited. This was tested on the parcel layer, located here: http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=dc09af5412c240d7ac836e81272a8714 I am finding that we do hit scalability issues with the Parcel Poly Domains, but with our Parcel Lines, no issues, in fact I can run the check on the complete dataset.
... View more
02-15-2011
05:18 PM
|
0
|
0
|
962
|
|
POST
|
When validating in single mode, I found 8 errors, when in batch mode, I see 0 errors, this is for a line FC.
... View more
02-10-2011
04:36 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1487
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 08-01-2022 02:13 PM | |
| 1 | 08-04-2022 02:37 PM | |
| 1 | 08-01-2022 02:10 PM | |
| 1 | 08-01-2022 02:30 PM | |
| 3 | 06-21-2022 02:07 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
07-16-2026
06:11 PM
|