IDEA
|
Hi @SarahSibbett - this will be fixed in the next release: ArcGIS Pro 3.3. Additional note: the align features tool, when used with a parcel fabric, will also automatically merge points that would otherwise be co-located; this was an enhanced capability introduced in 3.0. This also ties in with the other thread on Align Parcels regarding preserving the older point. With ArcGIS Pro 3.3 Align Features will follow the same pattern as for Align Parcels and will preserve the older point (unless if the younger point is a fixed point and the older point is not.) -Tim
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
37
|
IDEA
|
hi @CatherineRoloson , I was curious if you've investigated using the Import Parcel Fabric Points tool to achieve what you need? https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/parcel/import-parcel-points.htm It has a parameter that allows you to specify a record name (create new or add to pre-existing): -Tim
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
137
|
IDEA
|
For scenario #1 there is a solution coming in ArcGIS Pro 3.3. For scenario #2, it is also in the product plan, but may not make it into the 3.3 release.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
43
|
POST
|
From version 3.1 and higher, when using the Update COGO tool on very flat circular arcs, pre-existing Radius and Arclength COGO attributes are not overwritten.
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
49
|
POST
|
For the latest code for Update COGO, including access and use of the map’s ground to grid corrections, see the Parcel Utilities Add-in. Install: https://arcg.is/0f5reS Code: https://github.com/Esri/parcel-fabric-pro-addins/tree/main/ParcelsAddin The configuration settings are designed to protect against the overwriting of good COGO: These settings are saved between Pro sessions. -Tim
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
49
|
POST
|
@MarkWasdahl1- thank you for reporting this and for sending your data and requirements for this scenario. As per our call, it would be better to use the Merge Points tool. The "preserve" option will always default to the Fixed point, so you can drag a selection box around each point-pair and click Merge. The Parcel Alignment is designed to align parcels to other parcels, and so the tool is expecting to see other parcel polygons within the alignment buffer area. (The error message needs to be improved for your scenario.) To use the Parcel Alignment for your case the workaround is to make a temporary parcel polygon neighbor, proceed with the alignment to control points, and then delete the temporary parcel. Note that there is a similar requested enhancement for the Align Parcels tool to recognize connection lines. -Tim
... View more
02-15-2024
04:08 PM
|
1
|
0
|
173
|
IDEA
|
Thanks @SarahSibbett - I totally understand the request in the idea, and it absolutely makes sense to have this consistency with Move tool and the way it behaves with Map topology in Pro. Thanks for clarifying! My previous responses are only to make sure anyone reading this post are aware of the "Snap line ends to path" capabilities as an approach to get around this current limitation in Align Features when working with parcels. When using the Align Features tool, I'd also recommend avoiding the option "Preserve shapes outside the alignment area", as this will add extra vertices at the locations that intersect the perimeter of the alignment area. The methodology you describe with the Move tool also requires the "Stretch Topology" button to be turned on. For parcel boundaries this would (likely?) always be necessary. On a separate but related note, we have development work in progress (release version TBD) to enhance the move tool to be aware of parcel edges, independent of layer visibility. -Tim
... View more
02-09-2024
12:39 PM
|
0
|
0
|
92
|
IDEA
|
Thank you @MizukiKayano2 @SarahSibbett for reporting this bug - I can confirm the tool does not complete when using the "Snap lines ends to path" option while projecting on the fly, and while "No Topology" is set. For your reference: BUG-000164978 On the other case, I see how we are getting different results, and how this idea applies. In my case with the videos above the topology had not yet been validated, whereas in your case the topology validation has introduced a vertex via the connection line, and so the polygon's segment is bending at that location. There is also a vertex on the line, but its behavior is as expected and the line does not bend at the vertex. To workaround this you could shrink the polygons to seeds first, run the align features just on the lines, and then reconstruct from seeds. Another approach is to run the SLACA (Simplify By Straight lines and...) tool with a small tolerance on all the surrounding parcel polygons to remove these vertices, and then run the Align Features. Both of these approaches seemed to be effective for me.
... View more
02-08-2024
10:57 PM
|
0
|
0
|
295
|
IDEA
|
@SarahSibbett thanks for the additional info. This is very helpful. I'll research further, and report back here. Just to confirm though: the results shown in the video above when not projecting on the fly and with "No topology" set... those results are what is expected, correct?
... View more
02-08-2024
02:24 PM
|
0
|
0
|
318
|
IDEA
|
Hi @MizukiKayano2 , Thank you for the new videos. I've simulated your scenario. Below is a video using the Align Features tool, with the "Snap line ends to path" option turned on, and with topology turned off altogether. ("No Topology" set in the Quality tab) Does this get you to your intended end result? -Tim
... View more
02-07-2024
09:40 PM
|
0
|
0
|
347
|
IDEA
|
Hi @MizukiKayano2 and @CathyAppleton Please try the option to "Snap line ends to path"and let us know if it solves the problem. This option is the most conservative in terms of introducing new vertices and is much better at preventing the creation of bends in the lines. -Tim
... View more
02-02-2024
11:07 AM
|
0
|
0
|
439
|
BLOG
|
Hi @SamuelLingeman - would you please provide some more information? A screen shot showing your entries would be good. If you could provide your data that'd be useful too. I'll send you a private message. Thanks, Tim
... View more
01-29-2024
08:23 PM
|
0
|
0
|
248
|
IDEA
|
Hello @TomNeer and @DennisTebo There is an add-in available that will set the ground to grid values whenever changing the active record. It leverages enhancements made to the Parcel Fabric API with 3.2. If you have 3.2 or higher, you can install the add-in from here. There are some schema changes required. To use the add-in: after installing it you opt-in to the functionality by creating two [double] fields on the Records feature class called 'DistanceFactor' and 'DirectionOffset'. Type in, or calculate the appropriate direction offset and combined scale factor values into these fields for the records in the records feature class. The map's ground to grid correction will change to the (non-null) values found in these fields whenever a record is activated. If the value in the activated record is null, then it will not change the currently set ground to grid value. Set Ground To Grid From Active Record You can also use the add-in button called 'Save Ground To Grid To Record' on the active record's heads up display menu to save the map's ground to grid correction values to these fields. Existing values will be overwritten. For all who use this add-in please provide feedback on its functionality; this will influence our implementation of the functionality in the core product in a future release. If you are a developer : - the code is available here. - in brief, with 3.2 the API provides a new event that is fired when the map's active record is changed. -Tim
... View more
01-22-2024
08:22 PM
|
0
|
0
|
106
|
IDEA
|
Hello All, In ArcGIS Pro 3.1 this add-in was not refreshing the CAD layer properly after the tool was run. The workaround was to shut down and restart Pro to see the layer properly placed. For ArcGIS Pro 3.2 and higher a new version of the add-in is available that properly refreshes the layer. If you are using ArcGIS Pro 3.2 or higher, it's recommended that you download the latest version of this add-in from here. In general, add-ins are designed to be forward compatible, however in some instances changes in the underlying .Net SDK require that a newer version be compiled to get improved functionality, as is the case here. If you have the prior version installed, first remove it, and then replace it with this version. -Tim
... View more
11-21-2023
02:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
491
|
POST
|
Hello @ndunn54 the Circular Arc tool can double as a curve calculator. Here's a previous post with the same question that has more information about that: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/curve-calculator-for-arcgis-pro/m-p/393360#M17395 Does this help for your situation? Thanks, -Tim
... View more
11-09-2023
09:07 AM
|
1
|
0
|
410
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 02-15-2024 04:08 PM | |
1 | 10-07-2013 06:16 PM | |
1 | 11-09-2023 09:07 AM | |
1 | 10-17-2023 12:36 PM | |
1 | 10-17-2023 02:02 PM |
Online Status |
Online
|
Date Last Visited |
2 hours ago
|