Latest Contributions by MarceloRosensaft

Thank you both for the assistance! Where can I find the description of the "calcite-ui" options? Thanks again, Marcelo   ... View more

Hello @RandallWilliams  Regarding the header "X-Content-Type-Options Header", you wrote that Esri is working on it. Are there any news about it? Thank you in advance, Marcelo ... View more

Thank you very much! Your suggested option seems to be what I need. I'm counting the features for each layer in the view and I have to count again every time the view changes. Today I do it with layerView.watch('updating'... for every layer and I also catch separately the visibility of the layers since the layerView doen't update when the layer not visible. With your option everything will be simpler. I'm starting to put it in my code. Thanks again! Marcelo ... View more

Hello! Any way to do the opposite? I have an experience in the developer edition and needs to migrate it to the online. Thank you in advance, Marcelo ... View more

Hello, I'm having the same problem and it has nothing to do with access permissions or anything else. I run the same python in two computers that deal with the same files in our internal network. The one with the Pro 2.7 works and the one with the Pro 2.9 doesn't. Besides, you don't need much code to show the problem. Two lines are enough to make the python crash: # p_Pro_project is the path of an existing project o_Pro_project = arcpy.mp.ArcGISProject(p_Pro_project) o_Pro_project.save()   Any ESRI people can confirm the bug or the "by design feature"? It would be nice at least to hear a YES or a NO.   Thanks, Marcelo ... View more

Somebody changed the game rules and didn't dare to tell us. I'm sure somebody from ESRI will jump in and explain ... View more

Hello! What would be the way to add/publish a feature layer without the export capabilities? Thanks, Marcelo ... View more

Thank you, Nathan! I got help from the ESRI distributor in Israel. We tried everything and nothing helped. No hint of the reason for the situation. So, we're doing a restore from backup. Thanks, Marcelo ... View more

Hello Dan, Thank you for your response. Following is a description of part of my system: I have a table with about 10000 records (fossil specimens - the specimens table) The table is related to a FC with about 350 points (localities where the fossils were found - the localities FC) in a many-to-one relationship The specimen table has a field that contains the genus of the specimen. The genus is not an unique field and there’re about 130 values There is a table that contains the ~130 genus values - the genus table What the user of the app wants to achieve is: Select a genus value from the unique list. Let say genus==X Filter the specimens by the selected genus and get only the specimens with genus X Filter the localities list and the localities map accordingly, so they display only the localities where specimens with genus X were found Following are the widgets of the page: A filter widget based on the genus table - W1 A list widget based on the genus table - W2 A list widget based on the specimen table - W3 A list widget based on the locality FC - W4 A map widget based on the locality FC - W5 This is how it is implemented today: The user selects one genus value in W1 The filter widget does not have a trigger so it filters W2 but it doesn’t select anything The widget W2 shows only the genus selected in W1 The user selects manually the one genus in W2 This step could be done automatically if the widget filter could trigger some selection action on a list If there’s something selected from a previous run, the results are strange what may be quite confusing to the user. The selection action on W2 triggers a filter on the specimen table (framework) and a selection on the same specimen table. As a result, W3 is filtered and its records are selected If I apply a counter on the amount of records, for an expected large result, the result is either 1980 or 99 but not the real amount. It looks like there is a limit on the amount of records selected The user must manually unselect one record in W3 and select it again This is because W3 should trigger a filter on the localities table (framework) and on the localities map but this trigger doesn’t work unless the user does some manual selection W4 and W5 display the localities required, the ones related to specimens with the selected genus I hope my explanation is clear because due to a problem in my enterprise portal I cannot prepare screenshots to show the widgets and the data behind them. Thank you in advance, Marcelo ... View more

Hello Dan, Thank you for your response. Following is a description of part of my system: I have a table with about 10000 records (fossil specimens - the specimens table) The table is related to a FC with about 350 points (localities where the fossils were found - the localities FC) in a many-to-one relationship The specimen table has a field that contains the genus of the specimen. The genus is not an unique field and there’re about 130 values There is a table that contains the ~130 genus values - the genus table What the user of the app wants to achieve is: Select a genus value from the unique list. Let say genus==X Filter the specimens by the selected genus and get only the specimens with genus X Filter the localities list and the localities map accordingly, so they display only the localities where specimens with genus X were found Following are the widgets of the page: A filter widget based on the genus table - W1 A list widget based on the genus table - W2 A list widget based on the specimen table - W3 A list widget based on the locality FC - W4 A map widget based on the locality FC - W5 This is how it is implemented today: The user selects one genus value in W1 The filter widget does not have a trigger so it filters W2 but it doesn’t select anything The widget W2 shows the genus selected in W1 The user selects manually the one genus in W2 This step could be done automatically if the widget filter could trigger some selection action on a list If there’s something selected from a previous run, the results are strange what may be quite confusing to the user. The selection action on W2 triggers a filter on the specimen table (framework) and a selection on the same specimen table. As a result, W3 is filtered and its records are selected If I apply a counter on the amount of records, for an expected large result, the result is either 1980 or 99 but not the real amount. It looks like there is a limit on the amount of records selected The user must manually unselect one record in W3 and select it again This is because W3 should trigger a filter on the localities table (framework) and on the localities map but this trigger doesn’t work unless the user does some manual selection W4 and W5 display the localities required, the ones related to specimens with the selected genus The localities displayed are less than the expected because of the limitation on the amount of specimen records selected I hope my explanation is clear because due to a problem in my enterprise portal I cannot prepare screenshots to show the widgets and the data behind them. Thank you in advance, Marcelo ... View more

. ... View more