POST
|
Thanks Jonathan. It is helpful, but as you said, doesn't provide any ammunition for budget discussions. Reaching out to few surrounding localities is proving to be helpful. I'll update the post once we decide on our strategy.
... View more
06-22-2018
05:28 AM
|
0
|
0
|
653
|
POST
|
Thanks Jonathan. The links are incredibly helpful. I'm also in need of some real world deployment examples to support my argument/request for resources. From what I've read in the Enterprise deployment strategies section, it appears a minimum of 4 servers are required and in our case, 5 including ArcGIS Server.
... View more
05-23-2018
01:43 PM
|
0
|
3
|
653
|
POST
|
Hey Everyone, We are in the beginning stages of a project to migrate our current 10.4.1 set up to Enterprise with a federated Portal. I am curious how most folks configure their Enterprise deployment, specifically interested in the number of servers being utilized and the roles that they play. I am trying to determine early estimates of budgeting for this project as well as gauging potential workload for our network/server team. Thanks in advance!
... View more
05-23-2018
09:45 AM
|
0
|
6
|
801
|
POST
|
We are looking to take advantage of the ability to store credentials for a secure ArcGIS Server service shared on AGOL. However, I wanted to understand a bit more about how the credentials are stored in AGOL in order to be able to ensure that the credentials are secure. This will no doubt require a explanation to our security folks, and I just want to be able to speak to the method of storage and the security behind it. Is it encrypted etc. Thanks in advance!
... View more
05-23-2018
09:43 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1696
|
POST
|
In Desktop, we have created to layers from the same source feature class that are differentiated by definition queries. We then create a relationship class (in the map document) for both layers to a single table. This works great in desktop, but when we publish the map service to ArcGIS Server, one layer is assigned both relationships and the other has none. From what I can see, when the data is published to ArcGIS Server, the relationships are established on layer source name and ignore layer IDs or layer names. In desktop: CasesActive (Case FC with def query) have inspections (relationship) CasesInactive (Case FC with def query) have inspections (relationship) Published to AGS: CasesActive (Case FC with def query) have inspections (relationship) have inspections (relationship) CasesInactive (Case FC with def query) Screenshot from AGS rest endpoint: 10.4.1 environment
... View more
12-27-2017
05:52 AM
|
0
|
1
|
490
|
POST
|
Appreciate everyone's responses and guidance. We worked with Esri Support (who were great as always ) and they helped to identify our issue. Turns out there was a corrupt spatial index in our database that was preventing the database from being compressed.We ran Rebuild Spatial Indexes and Analyze Datasets as suggested and all issues were resolved. Thanks again!
... View more
09-25-2017
02:06 PM
|
2
|
0
|
777
|
POST
|
Appreciate your response regarding the due diligence of our DBA, although I question the need to phrase it that way. Especially coming from an Esri employee. I've dealt with Esri employees on many occasions, and I have to say this is the first time I've been dissapointed. Our DBA migrated to 2016 SQL but set up the database to run in 'Compatibility level' of SQL Server 2008. I neglected to mention that in my post. It has been modified to reflect the correct environment settings: 10.2.2 SDE in 2016 SQL running in Compatibility Level of SQL Server 2008. In addition, it's our development environment. Our DBA has multiple back ups of the database and has already, in an effort to trouble shoot this issue, restored backups from our production environment to the new 2016 SQL environment.
... View more
09-25-2017
02:01 PM
|
1
|
0
|
777
|
POST
|
Hey Everyone, Hoping you can help in an error I'm receiving while trying to compress our enterprise database. The error is popping up in our development environment which we are currently using to test our upgrade to 10.4.1 from 10.2.2. Current Desktop Environment: 10.4.1 Current Server Environment: 10.4.1 Current SDE Environment: 10.2.2 Current SQL Environment 2016 (running with 'Compatibility level' of SQL Server 2008) We originally updated our desktop and server environments when our database was still in SQl Server 2008 R2. Once those migrations/upgrades were complete, our DBA moved our enterprise database (development) to SQL Server 2016. This is when the error starting appearing. We're receiving this error message whenever we try to compress our database: ['Traceback (most recent call last):\n', ' File "\\\\tempest\\shared\\GIS\\System Administration\\Admin Tools Test\\Database\\Maintenance\\Hurley_Compress.py", line 66, in main\n arcpy.Compress_management(hurley_sde)\n', ' File "C:\\Program Files (x86)\\ArcGIS\\Desktop10.4\\ArcPy\\arcpy\\management.py", line 4549, in Compress\n raise e\n', 'ExecuteError: ERROR 999999: Error executing function.\nFailure to access the DBMS server [[Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Communication link failure] [dbo.DEFAULT][STATE_ID = 1493628]\nUnderlying DBMS error [dbo.DEFAULT]\nFailed to execute (Compress).\n\n'] We are able to perform all other standard and administrative tasks without issue such as reconciling/posting versions, deleting and recreating versions, publishing feature services, editing, etc. Updating schema etc etc etc. This is the only time we see this error. *** EDIT: We also tried upgrading the geodatabase to 10.4.1 without success. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
... View more
09-15-2017
09:10 AM
|
0
|
5
|
1539
|
POST
|
Just want to confirm that we are also experiencing issues with the new release. PopUp window issues especially. Field labels appear, but no field values. Doesn't occur on all layers and appears to be limited to string fields. Affecting our field operations staff!!!
... View more
07-18-2017
06:33 AM
|
0
|
1
|
601
|
POST
|
I've attempted to change the theme color to what I want the category links to be, and then coded the other links back to the original theme color. This is not a method I want to pursue, as there are far more "other" links than there are category links.
... View more
06-14-2017
07:32 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2464
|
BLOG
|
The issue was with nested groups. Once I removed the nested groups, everything was working properly.
... View more
05-19-2017
07:00 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1077
|
POST
|
I've tried linking to other websites with success, but having trouble with youtube. The iframe is just blank.
... View more
05-19-2017
06:58 AM
|
0
|
5
|
1420
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 04-28-2017 01:09 PM | |
1 | 09-25-2017 02:01 PM | |
2 | 04-25-2017 10:27 AM | |
1 | 12-11-2017 05:42 AM | |
1 | 08-18-2015 08:48 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
01-29-2024
09:23 AM
|