IDEA
|
Groups are pretty essential to controlling access on AGOL and therefore the ability to create them is something that should not be given out lightly in an organization. I think in general all permissions need to be separated out more finely with roles, there are too many things that are grouped into a single permissions but this is probably the lowest hanging fruit.
... View more
03-17-2025
11:41 AM
|
3
|
0
|
197
|
IDEA
|
needed, especially since dashboards randomly break from time to time with no obvious cause. When that occurs you're out of luck and have to rebuild from scratch. Be great if I could just run a script in that scenario. Also would be much better for making copies with different content sources instead of using AGOL Assistant. We won't get this though, they're too busy putting AI features into everything that no one needs.
... View more
02-28-2025
12:31 PM
|
0
|
0
|
983
|
POST
|
Same issue since upgrading to 3.3. **bleep** ESRI, every time something gets updated; QC must be non-existent there.
... View more
07-01-2024
08:12 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3204
|
POST
|
This is what I was looking for. ESRI needs to start thinking a little harder when they put together documentation, something like this definitely should be mentioned in the guide for creating tools in a python toolbox. I wrote this post when I was a pretty frustrated after spending an hour going through their docs trying to find this.
... View more
05-07-2024
06:32 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3726
|
POST
|
I'm creating a script tool inside of a python toolbox (.pyt) and having a frustrating time dealing with files relative to the .pyt file location. This is a very standard thing in python (or really any development project) to have ancillary files in same directory and to access them based on their relative path. For an unexplained reason ArcGIS Pro chooses to change the working directory to an entirely different location from where the .pyt actually is stored. Please tell me I don't have to hardcode a path to access some files...
... View more
05-03-2024
09:38 AM
|
1
|
9
|
3867
|
POST
|
What are they going to do the bug is already known and there is no plan to address?
... View more
05-03-2024
09:32 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1653
|
POST
|
I have a python web tool I made that has an associated map service. The tool runs without issue and the result can be added to my map as a Map Image Layer but if I print the map the layers features won't be on it. All my other mapping services are added to the map without an issue, it's only this one that's a problem. API Version 4.25
... View more
09-15-2023
02:29 PM
|
0
|
1
|
692
|
POST
|
That is not the direct reason...as the error states it's an underlying exception raised by pandas due to non finite values being in one of the columns/fields; I get the same error with fields that have no coded domains. My guess is that in older versions of the API they were catching this error or doing a conditional check before fixing and returning from the query method but for whatever reason the workflow has been axed in the newest version. Could also be to a newer pandas version making a change. Either way, I'm not going looking through all that code to figure it out haha. To check for the field you could iterate through every field in the layer and try a query with as_df =True for each of them...whatever fields are causing the error will fail. @ConradSchaefer__DOIT_ good pick up on the .sdf property still working...it's not ideal but it is a workable fix until this is addressed (for me atleast). I haven't tested, but another solution would be to do what I am suggesting above to find the fields and then doing an update to update any NA or INF values (or values that will convert to those types in pandas rather) to some default value. Hopefully ESRI will address this soon.
... View more
09-23-2022
06:18 AM
|
0
|
0
|
6128
|
POST
|
I'm trying to export a file geodatabase via the createReplica operation. I've tried both through the python API and the REST API directly (using requests) but both fail on my hosted feature layer due to an issue exporting the relationships for one of my layers...it does not give any more information then that. Does anyone know a possible fix or the root cause of it? I have an almost identical hosted feature layer I use for testing and this works with no issue on it so it must be something with the data but I can't figure out what. The layer is Sync Enabled and here are the parameters I'm using: # Using requests
data = {'f' : 'json',
'replicaName' : "pi_features_prd",
'layers' : layers,
'layerQueries': json.dumps(layer_queries),
'returnAttachments' : 'false',
'returnAttachmentsDatabyURL' : 'false',
'syncModel' : 'none',
'dataFormat' : 'filegdb',
'async' : 'true',
'token': token}
result = requests.post(replica_url, data=data).json()
# Using Python API
gis = GIS("https://arcgis.com", username, password)
fs_item = gis.content.get(item_id)
fc = FeatureLayerCollection.fromitem(fs_item)
sync_manager = SyncManager(fc)
result = sync_manager.create(
output_fgdb_name,
layers,
json.dumps(layer_queries),
return_attachments=True,
sync_model = 'none',
asynchronous=True,
wait=False,
attachments_sync_direction='bidirectional',
data_format='filegdb'
)
# the error
"""
replicaName': 'pi_features_prd', 'replicaID': '', 'submissionTime': 1661540514537, 'lastUpdatedTime': 1661540521653, 'status': 'Failed', 'error': {'code': 500,
'message': 'Unable to create replica. Please check your parameters.', 'details': ['Exporting relationships for layer 7 failed.']}}
"""
... View more
08-26-2022
12:49 PM
|
1
|
1
|
787
|
POST
|
The setting in connect/web app to "Require update to latest version of this survey" is useless in the workflow where you have users accessing a survey via a map popup if the previous version of the survey is already downloaded on their device. In this scenario the old version of the survey will automatically open within the Survey123 app (from either Field Maps or Collector) and the user can submit without issue. Is there anyway to stop this from happening?
... View more
07-20-2022
08:08 AM
|
7
|
7
|
2029
|
POST
|
Hmm okay thanks for the help. I'm starting to think it may have been either a corrupted service definition or an issue with the symbols used (they are a custom font). That being said, even after I switched back to the subtype field and set symbols on AGOL using one of their symbol types the issue persisted, so more likely something with the SD I would think. Probably gonna have to go to ESRI support...be super fun.
... View more
01-12-2022
10:36 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3788
|
POST
|
Can you publish the same layer again, but this time have the layer uniquely symbolized with a different field. That's how my layers were published when I encountered this. Going to do the inverse with my own data, but I can't share and show it due to the nature of it; would be good to have a public example for ESRI if needed.
... View more
01-12-2022
08:37 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3796
|
POST
|
No. Are you sure you have a subtype applied to that layer? Check your service definition. Also, what operating system are you using for field maps? I only tested IOS
... View more
01-12-2022
04:42 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3804
|
POST
|
What's the reasoning? Is this a side effect of something else or an issue with the field apps (it happens in collector also). Symbology w/o the subtype field works fine in Map Viewer, it's only in the field apps I'm having the issue. It's weird, they'll still come up as related layers to other layers in the map, but any arcade expressions set with them no longer work and the feature don't display on the map (but no loading error). As soon as you switch back to the subtype field the problem is fixed I can't find anything in the documentation regarding it. It's a pain for me as I have to have subtypes for my field for reasons I won't bore those reading this with. edit: Look like it had nothing to do with subtypes but the symbols we were using may not be supported in the field apps for some reason...or possibly some side effect of them; with these symbols removed the issue is gone. Anyone know if there is a reference for symbology and fonts supported by Field Maps and Collector?
... View more
01-11-2022
02:55 PM
|
0
|
8
|
4304
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
3 | 03-17-2025 11:41 AM | |
1 | 05-03-2024 09:38 AM | |
1 | 08-26-2022 12:49 PM | |
7 | 07-20-2022 08:08 AM | |
1 | 06-26-2020 07:03 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
05-31-2025
08:23 AM
|