IDEA
|
In ArcGIS Pro 3.3, query builder experience is enhanced - it does not start to fetch unique values right away. Instead it waits until you click to expand the values drop down box. In case for feature layer off a utility network service, you might need to click More button to fetch all unique values. Thanks for your suggestion.
... View more
yesterday
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
POST
|
So you can do the time sliders without having them in a mosaic dataset on an image server? yes, that is correct. In the animated gif above, I used 3 different raster layers. They are not inside a mosaic dataset. And it is a map service not an image service. What if I made a tile package (.tpkx) of of a time enabled mosaic dataset? I'm not an expert on tile packages. My understanding is same as what @George_Thompson suggested above. Tile packages are not time aware. In you case, once 11.3 is available, all you need to do is add your raster layers in a map in Pro, make them time aware, and then share that out as a map service. I hope this helps and please let us know if you run into any issue with this workflow while (I'm assuming) you will be testing this out with 11.3 enterprise.
... View more
yesterday
|
0
|
0
|
14
|
POST
|
thanks @TravisFreed1 The reason the time slider does not work in Map Viewer for your case is that the map service doesn't report the necessary time related properties in its REST resources. If everything goes as planned starting 11.3, map service will honor that 'the entire layer is shown within a fixed time extent' option for a layer; it will report that info in its REST resources and when a web client such as Map Viewer passes in a time-extent in an export operation, map service will honor that and return correct results showing only raster layers that are within the current time extent. As you see in my animated gif above. please let me know if you have any question.
... View more
yesterday
|
0
|
1
|
19
|
POST
|
@TravisFreed1 I assume you have used this option to make your raster layers time aware. If that is the case, then the support should be coming in for 11.3 release if everything does as planned. Here is an early preview to hype it up 😄 I hope this helps.
... View more
Monday
|
0
|
1
|
77
|
IDEA
|
@Geographic_Mythos I want the option to disable Schema Locking for Shared Instances. Then you should be all good for your workflow. If I recall correctly, in 11.2 'schema locking' is disabled for all shared instances -- that also means that shared instances don't hold any schema locks.
... View more
Monday
|
0
|
0
|
59
|
IDEA
|
@Geographic_Mythos Our goal is to provide an option that would allow you to control that schema locking for shared instances in 11.3. Please note this option will get applied to **all** shared instances. Either all shared instances are enabled with schema locking or disable. You won't be able to do that for per service basis. I'm not sure which enterprise release you have. Technically schema locking is disabled for all shared instances, the Manager site doesn't provide any UI option to change that settings. That should change in 11.3. having schema locking disabled is what you are asking for. Pls let me if I got it wrong. If so, then the current state should be working for you, no? thanks
... View more
Monday
|
0
|
0
|
64
|
IDEA
|
@AdamGaudet CIMPATH=map/sdg_sign2.json is the unique identifier of your layer.
... View more
Friday
|
0
|
0
|
37
|
POST
|
@marnoclo would you mind clarify this part? I'd like to be able to choose a geographical area from a FC and display only the relevant data within that area many FCs with "data" were you referring to features (e.g. trees, streets, parcels etc.) or feature-classes/layers? also, what type of service are you planning to publish? finally, how are you planning to use a geographical area as your filter? Do you want to set that from a web app? or you want to publish a service with a spatial filter and end users can't modify that? thanks
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
131
|
IDEA
|
@DALINEPJ when you click a footprint polygon, it shows the path of the dataset in the popup window like below. Is that not helping in your workflow? Maybe I misunderstood your ask. If so, would you mind provide me a bit more information to help understand.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
43
|
POST
|
@JasminePrater That is expected behavior with map image layer. That is because when you interact with map, one single request for a map image layer (no matter how many sub layers it contains) goes to the server. The map service draws all those layers for a single call on the server side and returns a resultant image that gets draped on the map in your web app. Whereas for every single feature layer, web apps make at least one request... so, if you have 10 feature layers in your map, it will send 10 requests. And features with geometries come back in results and web map draw them on the client map. That is why map image layers are remained in a group structure even though it might have only one layer in it. If you don't want group structure, then as @Blevins_Mark suggested above, you need to add individual layer off a map service as feature layer. you can also create feature layer portal item using similar url that Blevins mentioned above. And that will allow to browse and pick that feature layer. Again at that point it will not get added as a map image layer, rather a feature layer.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
190
|
POST
|
@AmritaPatra if you do NOT want to include features are "touched" by the filter-geometry, you can use the relationparam parameter of a query operation, instead of spatialRel parameter. This gives you most control. for more information on this spatial relationship description, please check this help topic out: https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcobjects/latest/net/webframe.htm#ISpatialFilter_SpatialRelDescription.htm hope this helps Tanu
... View more
3 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
73
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 11-08-2023 05:23 PM | |
1 | 01-22-2024 01:14 PM | |
1 | 01-22-2024 02:14 PM | |
4 | 3 weeks ago | |
1 | a month ago |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
48m ago
|