|
POST
|
Hi @apgis16, There is a way to do this in Dashboards but it may require the creation of a custom data expression, configuring the information: Set one set of fields to indicate the label and another set of fields as date fields and specify a date value you want. For the values, set the values as the labels and the dates as to whatever minimum date you need or it can be acquired automatically from your data. Create a featureset as the returned expression value Create a filter and set the expression as the data to use Set the actions to filter accordingly.
... View more
Wednesday
|
0
|
0
|
60
|
|
IDEA
|
Hi @AlfredBaldenweck, I think the capability already exists, at least last time I checked. In field maps you can specify the interval to drop vertices, if it is a line, or points at regular intervals. You would just need to set in in field maps as part of the collection settings. I don't know which version of enterprise supports it but in AGO it is possible.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
241
|
|
POST
|
I have a few thoughts but it could potentially be related to one of the following: UTM_Aerial_2024 - Supported Query Formats: JSON, geoJSON, PBF UTM_Aerial_2025 - Supported Image Format Types: PNG32,PNG24,PNG,JPG,DIB,TIFF,EMF,PS,PDF,GIF,SVG,SVGZ,BMP Layer: Layer: HennepinCounty_MN_Nearmap_Sp24_6in.sid (ID: 0) Imagery/UTM_Aerial_2024 (MapServer) Format: MIXED - UTM_Aerial_2024///MapServer/0 Compression Quality: 75.0 Origin: X: -1.190968E8 Y: 1.407315E8 Supported Operations: Generate Renderer, Return Updates,Iteminfo, Thumbnail Metadata Supported Operations: Query, Query Attachments, Query Analytic, Generate Renderer, Return Updates, Iteminfo, Thumbnail, Metadata Any number of these could be the issue. Try asking for a differently formatted aerial image with similar specifications and see if that is the issue or pulling in the actual imagery layer using the same direct layer This could also be it below
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
341
|
|
POST
|
Aside from simply enabling tracking, you can also use a simple hosted layer and ask for participants to collect by using the stream capability in field maps. This will create a route based on the paths that are collected along a stream so that it can be seen as they finish editing. It is a bit more simplified than using tracking but, if are looking to collect data along a route, then that could also help. The only limiatation with the above scenario is that it doens't allow for other features to be collected simultaneously. Depending on the use case, if it is simply getting tracking location then a simply streamed editing feature will work. Otherwise, if there is a need for additional information to be collected while walking a route then the location tracking would be needed.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
315
|
|
POST
|
Can you possibly break down the steps you are taking to see whether the issue is upon starting an edit session? It might be that is waiting for trigger in order for those fields to populate but I would need to test and see if that is an issue upon either editing or starting an edit session. Try also simply adding return DateOnly(Today()) or some combination to see if that comes up with anything.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
226
|
|
POST
|
Hi @apgis16, One thing you can try is simply passing DateOnly() to see if that works. The today function returns date and time so that might be the issue. If you want to use date from Today() then you will need to parse each portion and return the date only of the current date.
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
2
|
243
|
|
POST
|
The other thing to consider is using the IIF function to determine if the record is a feature vs an empty value. Typically something like: var CHAreas = FeatureSetByName($datastore, 'CharacterArea', ["MSLINK"], true)
var F = First(Intesects(CHAreas,Geometry($feature)))
iif( TypeOf(F) == 'Feature', Upper(DomainName(F,'MS_Link)), $feature.CH_AREA_FK )
... View more
2 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
123
|
|
POST
|
Hi @IsaacFuller, In pro, there is an option where you have the ability to join either as a one to one or as a one to many such that, if there are multiple records with the same field, then you can join the larger of the datasets with the smaller one and a single joined record will be created for every duplicate row with that exact id. If it is a true one to one but the polygons have some manner of overlap then a spatial join might be best. You can also use the join features tool to join the two datasets.
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
99
|
|
IDEA
|
Hi @AJR, So when it comes to displaying large datasets where you simply want to view a small subset of that dataset, then I would highly recommend creating a query layer so that it only pulls records based on what parameters you set and it can also limit the number of records that get returned. A query layer, if you don't know, can directly access a database table and pull records using a SQL query rather than trying to connect to the database and read the records in pro. Just a suggestion.
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
241
|
|
POST
|
Hi Matt, An option that you can try is using linear referencing to pick an approximate location rather than using an address. It works similar to addressing but will locate using a specified distance along a route using the address number rather than a full address. You can build that as part of the addressing so that locations can be identified at set intervals along routes.
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
0
|
132
|
|
POST
|
As @KenBuja has mentioned, It isn't atypical for arcade to pull the first record which makes testing difficult. Try Filtering for any other record to see if you get the same result. If not then that points to the fact that the first record simply either exists outside of the image(ry) and cannot get the pixel value or it is something else.
... View more
03-04-2026
01:08 PM
|
1
|
0
|
499
|
|
IDEA
|
You could simply create a dummy hosted service for the sole purpose of using it as a markup layer. We have done that from time to time and it also helps that we can download that layer if needed for other things.
... View more
03-03-2026
10:35 AM
|
0
|
0
|
389
|
|
POST
|
Hi @wizgis, So one of the many recommendations, especially when it comes to having multiple layers, is to have the layers published separately rather than all at once. The reasoning behind that is there might be some layers that are more intensive processing wise than others which could potentially consume more resources. The other things to check are: Drawing scale: Some layers drawn at higher extents will consume more resources than those drawn at lower extents. Sample Records or Maximum Return Records: This will determine how many records will be read and displayed by the server and the higher this number is the more resources will get consumed. Coded domains: If there are not many coded domains then try diminishing the count. Tile service: Try publishing a tile service vs a regular map service since tile services typically render faster since the pyramids are manually created using the data rather than dynamically. Try the options above and see if that improves the performance of your map services.
... View more
03-03-2026
10:33 AM
|
3
|
0
|
586
|
|
POST
|
I think the erase tool may help to some extent also. That might indicate which one is not the duplicate but I would need to test that. Another option is to run the frequency tool on both datasets and do a comparison that way. Otherwise, assuming the addresses have matching values, @DanPatterson recommendation would be best.
... View more
03-03-2026
10:24 AM
|
0
|
0
|
316
|
|
POST
|
Hi @MarkChambers1, I personally have never used Monitor before but I did some simple calculations and the only thing that I can think of is that Monitor may be looking at the different view states whereas your sql table might be the base table. Try comparing the total number of records the sql table but look under views and see if those record totals match what Monitor is looking at. We look at the view table rather than the base table to see how many active records exist before the base table is updated.
... View more
03-03-2026
10:21 AM
|
0
|
1
|
283
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 02-10-2026 06:09 AM | |
| 1 | 03-04-2026 01:08 PM | |
| 1 | 02-24-2026 12:59 PM | |
| 3 | 03-03-2026 10:33 AM | |
| 1 | 02-07-2026 06:04 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Wednesday
|