Latest Contributions by Trippetoe

@CraigGillgrass You're initial recommendation to read the blog did the trick for me. I admit i did have to read it a couple times to get the important piece about using the 'General' type of Attachment element. It seems that when using that element the 'keywords' parameter is not added to the query string. So all of our existing attachments are not filtered out.  Thank you for tip! ... View more

@CraigGillgrass Thanks for the link. The blog post certainly provides some context for what has changed. I'm still unsure of why the keywords parameter gets added to the queryAttachments request, or how i can control or configure what values it includes. Is there a blog that explains that? I'm probably missing a lot of important details and nuance, but it seems like i need to redo any maps used in ExBldr that includes layers with attachments (assuming we want to be able to edit the data) - is that correct? ... View more

@KenGalliher1 I noticed that i left a bad parameter in my code example (I've been trying every option to see what might matter and some slop did not get removed).  The right parameter is  attachments_sync_direction='bidirectional', In my original post i had that value as 'download', which does not work. ... View more

@KenGalliher1 Thanks for the code example. I changed the code as necessary for my hosted feature service and ran it. unfortunately, i got the same results: an other wise perfect file geodatabase with my related tables, attachment tables, etc - but there we no rows in the feature class, the related table, nor either of the attachment tables. The only table with any rows was the GDB_ServiceItems table. I don't know why really, but a hunch is that the attachments in the related table are causing the problem. Does your hosted feature service have attachments enabled on the related table (index 2 i believe in your example)? ... View more

Thanks for your response. I'm a bit behind you so i'll answer this response first.  Here's my python code that uses `replicas.create()`. As noted in my question, the code returns an empty file geodatabase... edit_date_filter = "EditDate >= '"+str(last_successful_run_date)+"'" feat_srvc = arcgis.features.FeatureLayerCollection(settings.AGOL_FEATURE_SERVICE_URL, agol_security_token) export_job = feat_srvc.replicas.create( replica_name='NameDoesNothing', layers=[settings.FS_IDX, settings.CONDITION_IDX], layer_queries={ str(settings.FS_IDX):{ "queryOption":"useFilter", "where":edit_date_filter}, str(settings.CONDITION_IDX):{ "queryOption":"useFilter", "where":edit_date_filter} }, geometry_filter=None, replica_sr=None, transport_type='esriTransportTypeUrl', return_attachments=True, return_attachments_databy_url=False, asynchronous=True, attachments_sync_direction='bidirectional', sync_model='none', data_format="filegdb", replica_options=None, wait=False, out_path=settings.DOWNLOAD_DIR, sync_direction=None, target_type='client')   Just for good measure, i'm including this 'direct request' against the createReplicas endpoint. the results are the same. a perfectly fine, but empty, file geodatabase..... url = f"{feat_srvc.url}/createReplica" data = { 'f': 'json', 'replicaName': 'test_direct4', 'layers': '[0,1]', 'layerQueries': '{"0": {"where": "1=1", "useGeometry": false, "includeRelated": true, "queryOption": "useFilter"}, "1": {"where": "1=1", "useGeometry": false, "includeRelated": true, "queryOption": "useFilter"}}', 'geometryType': 'esriGeometryPoint', 'returnAttachments': 'false', 'syncModel': 'none', 'syncDirection': 'bidirectional', 'dataFormat': 'filegdb', 'async': 'false', 'token': agol_security_token._con.token } response = requests.post(url, data=data) print(response.json()) dl_url = response.json().get('responseUrl') resp = requests.get(url=dl_url, params={'token': agol_security_token._con.token}) zipped = zipfile.ZipFile(io.BytesIO(resp.content)) ... View more

@VenkataKondepati thank you for the info. I have submitted a bug report with Esri Technical Support. ... View more

@TimJordan1   At this point the best Esri tech support is offering is that we just need to update our servers' operating systems. Would it be that simple. While i agree that is clearly the best long term approach, it's not helpful for the short term. Have you heard anything from Esri or figured out anything helpful to resolve this issue? ... View more

Hi @Neal_t_k   I've wandered pretty far down the 'roll-my-own-report-with-python' path. It's probably too far to back out of that path now 😉  Thanks again for all your help.  ... View more