POST
|
Seeing the same issue, but with some success using csv writer to write the role names. Testing with f strings in Python window returns the actual role name for me. portal_users = gis.users.search(max_users=1000) for user in portal_users: print(f"{user.username} - {user.role")
... View more
12-21-2023
03:13 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2089
|
IDEA
|
We have had issues dealing with multiple attachments for features in Collector. It would be useful if we could limit the number of attachments to 1 per feature.
... View more
01-08-2020
01:37 PM
|
8
|
1
|
1123
|
POST
|
Thank You Derek, It appears that this ArcGIS ideas entry is still just about photo size, not number of photos. I have started a new ArcGIS ideas entry for number limit here: https://community.esri.com/ideas/17834
... View more
01-08-2020
01:34 PM
|
1
|
1
|
817
|
POST
|
Is it possible to limit the number of attachments in Collector? Specifically, we want it to only be possible to attach one photo per point.
... View more
01-02-2020
12:00 PM
|
0
|
3
|
925
|
BLOG
|
Has ESRI considered adding the ability to have multiple records in one report document? We would like to use survey 123 to export monthly reports of construction photos, but need multiple photos and descriptions to appear on each page. We have about 300 photos per month so simply merging the separate documents is far too long.
... View more
12-30-2019
11:14 AM
|
0
|
0
|
23688
|
POST
|
I have a working model in Arcmap 10.3 that creates a feature class data from CSV file, queries the data according to a SQL Expression, and then conducts many spatial joins. The model works as expected, but I want to make the SQL Expression as easy as possible for users to enter who do not know SQL. How can I make the Query Builder window for this parameter reference the feature class so that the user can use the "Get Unique Values" button rather than entering field names? As it is currently, the Query Builder window has no fields to choose from, which leaves it up to user to know the field names and correct SQL syntax.
... View more
06-27-2019
09:31 AM
|
0
|
0
|
366
|
POST
|
Old thread, but I just used your code although I had to change 'r' to 'w+' in third line. Is this due to changes in python since 2014? I don't understand how your code could work because with the open function in 'read' mode it could not create the file.
... View more
06-26-2019
04:46 PM
|
0
|
0
|
639
|
POST
|
Arcmap 10.3. Both feature classes are in file geodatabases. The issue is happening with several different work areas, all are between separate pieces of multipart polygons. I briefly tried to replicate and could not.
... View more
06-24-2019
10:03 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1394
|
POST
|
Thanks Dan, I cannot make the surveys single part because the survey layer is continuously updated and accessed by several people who want one row per survey for simplicity in record keeping. I have changed the method to Within_Clementini, which has removed these false positives, and will just have to select and remove cases of partial overlap. It still seems nonsensical to me that the Completely_Within gets thrown off my the extent of Multipart Features while Within and Within_Clementini do not.
... View more
06-13-2019
12:21 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1394
|
POST
|
Yes it is a multipart feature. I tested an intersect and no results were returned, which is correct. Should I not use Completely Within with multipart features? The description does not mention that it considers extent any different than Within would.
... View more
06-13-2019
12:03 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1394
|
POST
|
I have a large feature class of survey areas that I need to Spatial Join to a target Feature Class of buffered work locations to find locations that are Completely Within a survey. This is part of a large model I have created for our team, but my coworker noticed it is returning some join features that do not contain the target features. What's more strange, is that when I switched the join option to just Within, which should be less limited in scope, these false positives disappear, although now I am left with other unwanted target features where work areas and surveys just partially overlap. What could cause this strange error? I have run the repair geometry tool on both feature classes involved. Are there other geometry errors that could be causing this? The image below shows the two work areas that are falsely returning information as if they were entirely within the survey area in orange.
... View more
06-13-2019
11:50 AM
|
0
|
6
|
1524
|
POST
|
Can anyone recommend an ideal set up for a remote office connecting to a server over a VPN connection? Remote office is experiencing issues with transferring data over the connection. Where the server is located the users do not have any issues. Internet speed did not help when increased at host location.
... View more
12-28-2016
03:02 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1594
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
8 | 01-08-2020 01:37 PM | |
1 | 01-08-2020 01:34 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
a week ago
|