POST
|
The feature search function in Collector WOULD be very useful, but when in search mode the submit button is not visible when editing. And, when the search is exited the feature cannot be selected manually from the map. The only thing to do is exit the map and reload and then it goes back to either the GPS location or the full extent, so you have to manually find the feature anyway unless you are already on site. Am I missing something, or did nobody with ESRI even try to use this? Thanks, cob
... View more
10-19-2020
07:46 AM
|
0
|
0
|
412
|
POST
|
No, we just had the recipient manually update the field. The http request is for the update service on the rest API for AGOL I think. I didn't know what James meant by the json and query parameters. Sorry couldn't be more help - cob
... View more
02-18-2020
10:11 AM
|
0
|
0
|
386
|
POST
|
It is set to send and receive on both the host and guest servers. Any other ideas? Thanks,cob
... View more
11-27-2019
11:03 AM
|
0
|
1
|
497
|
POST
|
I have a collaboration between our ArcGIS online org and our Enterprise portal (10.6). It will update items shared from the guest (portal) to the host (org) but items shared to the host workspace are not syncing with the portal group. I have it set to send and receive on both sides. What's the deal? Thanks, cob
... View more
11-22-2019
11:40 AM
|
0
|
3
|
559
|
BLOG
|
Is there any way to manipulate the label container in the map to show all the fields instead of truncating them with ...? Thanks, cob
... View more
10-17-2019
01:23 PM
|
0
|
0
|
11515
|
POST
|
I'm having this problem too. Just for the one survey I need of course, others are showing up but I haven't tried to edit and publish anything. Please get this fixed we are on a close time table here! Thanks, cob
... View more
09-20-2019
10:18 AM
|
0
|
1
|
3044
|
POST
|
We have a SQL Express 2012 sde on our server to which we can connect in Arcmap 10.6.1 but not Pro 2.4. The data store has been validated and also unregistered and re-registered. Can anyone provide information on this? Thanks, cob
... View more
08-22-2019
05:08 PM
|
0
|
1
|
392
|
POST
|
Yeah I remember the daml from going through the custom config tutorial. I don't see that file on my test machine, and I think it would only be there if someone had previously created a custom configuration. Furthermore I don't think you could just copy this file to the folder on the target machine ala ArcMap, because you have to set up the shortcut with the path to the pro exe as well as the daml location. And the user.config file seems to only contain elements pertaining to tool environment settings and such, not the UI. However, I did find an xml file in there which seems to reference (since I'm not an xml expert) panel docking settings kinda like you would see on a web page so I am going to copy this file to the same folder on another machine and see what happens - no great expectations but will let you know. Thanks, cob
... View more
07-03-2019
06:59 PM
|
0
|
0
|
963
|
POST
|
No, we just have a doc that tells the user where to find the task and dock it in a panel. We actually thought about setting it up manually on each user's machine, which would be much easier than the custom configuration and we would still have to make the shortcut for them. Let me know if you find a better way. Thanks, cob
... View more
07-03-2019
10:22 AM
|
0
|
2
|
963
|
POST
|
The problem is that all the versions have the same owner, 'admin' when the AGOL feature service is brought into Pro. So all the users can see all of the versions in the list - what would it take to get around this, so that each logged in user would be able to own their own versions? Thanks, cob
... View more
06-13-2019
10:12 AM
|
0
|
0
|
763
|
POST
|
Well I couldn't leave this alone James... have an https request connecting to the feature service through Flow (I think) but it doesn't do anything. The request works fine in the API in AGOL (having to hard code the objectid of course - I tried that in the Flow to no avail). In Flow it breezes right through with status 200 but fails to update the field. What am I missing here? Anything need to go in the header or am I totally off base? Thanks, cob
... View more
04-11-2019
10:11 AM
|
0
|
11
|
1830
|
POST
|
Thanks James. Please keep me posted on your progress - I will be monitoring this thread in case you have news. For now we are sending emails and editing the hidden field as you suggested. The response also triggers an email to the (public) submitting individual advising of the status. Thanks again James - cob
... View more
04-09-2019
11:02 AM
|
0
|
12
|
1830
|
POST
|
Ahh, I thought it might work that way - but which action do I use from Flow when entering the Http action? I assume you are referring back to the REST API? Can you show an example of what that would look like, say to change an approval field from No to Yes? Thanks for all your help, James.
... View more
04-08-2019
08:03 AM
|
0
|
14
|
1830
|
POST
|
Got the first part, apologies for my denseness. But you've intrigued me with the second webhook - would that be done in Flow as well? Can you give a brief example of how it would work? Thanks, cob
... View more
04-03-2019
11:42 AM
|
0
|
16
|
1830
|
POST
|
Thanks James - I haven't used Flow much, just to send notification emails, but we are trying to use the Flow approval process when a new survey response is submitted. Will Flow hold the survey response in limbo until it is approved or will it be posted before the workflow is initiated? Why do I need to add fields to the feature class when using the Flow process? I am basically stuck at what to do if Response (for the approval in Flow) is 'Reject' where I would just want to delete the record from the survey without posting. The only option for the S123 connector at that point is 'Get Surveys' and I can't see a way to reference anything from the target survey I set initially. Also, my understanding is that the dynamic content links for the S123 webhook do not recognize image attachments which is obviously one of our main concerns in this situation. But really if Flow will just hold the response and notify the reviewer that would meet our needs well enough. Can you elaborate a bit on how to set the second webhook using the survey content? Or is there a better way given the information above? Thanks, cob
... View more
04-03-2019
08:10 AM
|
0
|
18
|
1830
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
2 | 06-15-2017 01:58 PM | |
1 | 06-14-2017 01:46 PM | |
1 | 04-12-2016 11:26 AM | |
1 | 06-14-2018 10:01 AM | |
2 | 05-03-2017 11:49 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
11-11-2020
02:25 AM
|