POST
|
Hello @ChristopherCounsell , Thanks for the reminder to use Once(). I've used this before but forgot about it. BTW, the reason I use my own editor tracking fields (as well as the ESRI fields) is that if / when I need to make a structural or content update to the feature service, it auto updates (by nature) the last editor tracking field. This removes my history of last editor data so I have to update it with my own last editor field. Cheers, @BKS
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
1
|
81
|
POST
|
Hello I have a feature service consisting of a FC and a related Table; relationships is FC 1:M Table. When updating the values in the table all works as expected except... one field used to store the AGOL username ends up calculating this value for all of the records in the table that are related to FC. When I update other fields it only updates the target record in the table. The difference is that I use the following in the calculation column: pulldata("@property",'username') I don't understand why it updates all related records? Is there a way to prevent this? Thanks tonnes, BKS
... View more
4 weeks ago
|
0
|
3
|
112
|
IDEA
|
I have done almost exactly what @HélèneTouyéras describes in her use case. This would be very beneficial to have and it doesn't *seem* that it would be that difficult to implement. The value of consistency in the UI's is underrated for the UX. BKS
... View more
05-28-2024
06:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
196
|
POST
|
Thanks again to you both @abureaux and @jcarlson . I will try the remaining suggestion to avoid the 2 repeat recs being created if zero exist the first time and get back. RE: other two points, thanks for the confirmation info. Your help is most appreciated. BKS
... View more
05-15-2024
09:13 AM
|
0
|
0
|
462
|
POST
|
Hello @jcarlson and @abureaux and thanks for all your help ! I tried to get either, and even a combination, of your solutions to work for me but I kept getting strange results. I almost gave up and then I tried this solution: 1) Added once(count(${test_rpt})+1) to the repeat_count column of begin repeat record 2) Added allowAdds=true allowUpdates=false query to the bind::esri:parameters column of begin repeat record This solution produced the following: 1) After loading the survey from the INBOX, 1 additional repeat record (editable since allowAdds=true), was added. 2) It also loads any previous repeat records (read-only since allowUpdates=false query) 3) If I try to save the survey it notifies that I have a required field in the editable repeat record; which is correct. 4) After populating this one and only required field in the repeat, I am able to submit the survey This creates no blank repeat recs and also allows me to have required fields in the repeat. I've tested this but not exhaustively. I wonder if there is something you would expect to find given this solution (that perhaps I have not yet found)? One thing I noticed that is odd (and I cannot explain) is that IF the parent record has zero associated repeat recs, it automatically creates 2 repeat records the first time. BUT after at least one repeat records exists for a given parent record, it only creates 1 additional repeat record when opening. The other smallish thing is that the repeat that is displayed when the survey is opened is the first repeat created, followed by the next and so on. To get to the repeat that the user needs to update, they have to click through as many repeat recs as exist. I realize they can long click on the right arrow to go to the end of the repeat collection, but this is not obvious. I'm hoping that there might be a way to use position(..) and/or index to have the survey open to the last (most recent) repeat record. Finally one other small thing that I do not understand, is that the user is NOT able to delete the newly created repeat record even though the allowAdds=true. This I'm quite happy about but wasn't expecting it. Thanks again and I look forward to any further input / advice you might have. Cheers, BKS
... View more
05-14-2024
02:27 PM
|
0
|
2
|
482
|
POST
|
Thanks for that idea @jcarlson . Exactly when does the new repeat record in the 2nd nested repeat (i.e. the Edit Log) get created, when I increment the repeat count by 1? By doing so you think a new repeat record would be created? Ideally I'd like to create the Edit Log row when any RW value has been changed by the user in the form, BUT as a perhaps simpler alternative, is there a way to create this record as soon as I open the form if I'm doing so to Edit it ? Just searching for a reasonable solution; doesn't have to be perfect. However, it would be nice to have something better than relying on the user to add a repeat record and record the change they made. Your assistance is appreciated. BKS
... View more
05-12-2024
08:33 AM
|
0
|
0
|
552
|
POST
|
Hello @ClaudiaK and @BrentKinal1 , I realize your post was several years old but I'm having an issue that conflicts with what you are saying above. I'm using s123 website to view the data but the column headings in the table are NOT the labels but instead the name field for the question. On the other hand, the filter uses the label value so it's quite confusing to the user. Finally when we export the data, it uses the name field for column headings. I need to make this consistent so I tried the bind::esri:fieldAlias option mentioned and it did nothing to the table headings. Have you experienced what I'm experiencing and do you have any work-around to make the filter column names consistent with the table column names? thanks kindly, BKS
... View more
05-10-2024
12:15 PM
|
0
|
0
|
241
|
POST
|
Hello, Seeking ideas/direction on how to implement the following: We have a survey with nested repeats. We use the INBOX to load the survey and the user can make edits to the related 1st repeat. If any edits are done, we would like to automatically create one 2nd repeat record to guide the user to indicate / record what change was implemented (read edit log). Don't need to automatically define what exactly was changed. Instead just want to create the 2nd repeat record to allow the user to update what they have changed manually. Currently this is all working except the user must manually create an edit log record (2nd repeat). I would like to force this 2nd repeat record to at least be created automatically, knowing that the user can still delete it if they must. Your input is most appreciated. Cheers, BKS
... View more
05-10-2024
10:56 AM
|
0
|
9
|
641
|
POST
|
Hey there, I only noticed this within the last month or so. When using S123 website, specifically the table where there is a dropdown menu in the upper right hand corner of the table, it is hidden by the table itself when you click on the pull down. See attached images showing the pulldown and then the very top of the pulldown menu (the rest hidden by the table). NOTE - this pulldown is only provided when the survey is based on a 1:M relationship (e.g. asset and asset inspection repeat). I do not recall what this menu included but has anyone else noticed this and is there a work-around? In a possibly related matter, I also noticed that there seems to be a display issue. That is, when you select (not filter) one record by clicking on a row, then ctrl-click on another row, the two rows are selected BUT the related table rows are NOT both displayed in the select colour. Perhaps this pulldown which is no longer accessible gave the option to apply the selection to all related tables??? bks PS - if you can see the menu can you please let me know?
... View more
05-09-2024
08:39 AM
|
0
|
0
|
190
|
POST
|
@IsmaelChivite , had a feeling you might say that. Thx, BKS
... View more
10-31-2023
01:19 PM
|
0
|
0
|
248
|
POST
|
Hey there, Is there a way to allow users to "manage templates" when using the Reporting capability within S123 website? I have a group of users that can use the S123 website to view all survey data and run reports. But they would like to be able to create their own report templates and test/use them. Is there any way around this not being available? Thanks, BKS
... View more
10-31-2023
10:56 AM
|
0
|
2
|
319
|
POST
|
@ZacharySutherby Just confirmed that when I force it to List mode, it asks me to download it locally.
... View more
10-27-2023
11:33 AM
|
0
|
0
|
482
|
POST
|
@ZacharySutherby perhaps I've confused you. Currently I have all four FL pop-ups set to Auto mode. Two of them display the photo inline (i.e. see popupAutoAndGallery_asDesired.png attached), which I presume to be Gallery mode, and two of the FL's display them in a List-like fashion (i.e. see popupAutoAndGallery.png attached). When I click on the inline photo's (per popupAutoAndGallery_asDesired.png), a new tab is opened with the photo/jpg displayed. When I click on the List-like photo's (per popupAutoAndGallery.png), I am asked to download the photo locally. After doing so, it does not open the downloaded file into a new tab automatically. I believe based on my testing thus far, when I've tried to force it to use List mode, it does the same thing. Asks me to download it locally. Thanks for any help!
... View more
10-27-2023
11:27 AM
|
0
|
1
|
483
|
POST
|
I have 4 separate but similar surveys, each with it's own hosted feature layer in AGOL. Each of these 4 FLs supports attachments (i.e. photo's in my case). When I configure the pop-up attachments for each of these FLs I get different results. When I set them all to Gallery or Auto mode, two of the FLs show the photo's, while the other two show them in list-like mode. I say "list-like" because it is slightly differnt than the List option (see attached - one shows FL set to show attachments in Auto or Gallery, and the other is List mode). I would like them all to appear as photos. I suppose there could be something basic I'm missing but as far as I can tell there are no structural differences between the underlying FLs. Anyone else experience similar and/or have suggest how to resolve? Thanks, BKS PS - I realize this isn't necessarily a s123 question but since I'm collecting the data via S123 I decided to try here first.
... View more
10-26-2023
07:41 AM
|
0
|
3
|
597
|
POST
|
Hello there, I have a survey where I restrict what users can see to only those survey points they enter. I do this both within the survey collaboration options as well as the feature service supporting the hosted feature layer. This works well to prevent users from seeing data they should not within the field app, the s123 website and AGOL. However, I have a handful of management users that do not collect data but do need to view ALL of the data collected. I'm interested in hearing your recommended approach for this data to support a dashboard. Option 1 - was to create a hosted feature layer view of the survey data and share this with the management group of users. I've had success with this in past but for some reason I am unable to create a feature layer view that allows the management users view access. Option 2 - involves overwriting a copy of a feature layer specifically designed to support the dashboard. This would be automated via a python script. I prefer option 1 since it reads from the live data, but I am not sure if this should work or not. In other words, can the owner of a hosted feature layer that can thus view all of the data (despite any constraints), share a view of the feature layer to other non-owner users via a group (read the management users)? Many thanks for your input, Cheers, BKS
... View more
09-25-2023
12:59 PM
|
0
|
0
|
261
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 06-02-2023 01:51 PM | |
1 | 07-06-2023 11:44 AM | |
1 | 02-11-2021 09:18 AM | |
7 | 06-25-2021 09:54 AM | |
1 | 02-04-2021 12:20 PM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|