|
POST
|
Right, but you can write AddIns in Python for ArcMap now, so that's why I asked. For me, at least, coding in Python tends to be more intuitive than .NET. But perhaps i just have to knuckle down and learn some .NET! ;>)
... View more
04-23-2015
01:38 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1676
|
|
POST
|
Does anyone know if the ArcGIS Pro AddIn API will include a Python interface like there is with ArcMap?
... View more
04-23-2015
09:47 AM
|
0
|
3
|
4449
|
|
POST
|
Are you not able to place text (doesn't really matter what the text says) on the map layout, exactly where you want it, then name the text element and then using arcpy you can change the text for that element based on whatever logic you come up with?
... View more
03-19-2015
09:14 AM
|
1
|
1
|
625
|
|
POST
|
This is a know bug and the bug # is NIM086004. The workaround i listed where you could "describe" the layer and turn ultimately into a table seems like the best workaround in the meantime.
... View more
10-28-2014
09:41 AM
|
2
|
1
|
2001
|
|
POST
|
I was having the same problem with not being able to get the resulting table from MakeQueryLayer when not using a spatial column. I'm trying to work with this in a standalone python script so I'm not trying to add a table to ArcMap. I just want to copy out the table as a standalone table in some file geodatabase i'm working with. I stumbled upon another forum (Table analog of MakeQueryLayer) that made me realize I still think there's a bug as the help for MakeQueryLayer in 10.2.2 says "If the SQL query does not return a spatial column, the output will be a stand-alone table." which isn't true as it appears to return a pointer to a database (maybe similar to a sql view?). I'll contact ESRI about this. Here's how i got it working in my python code: arcpy.MakeQueryLayer_management(database_connection,"out_layer_name", query,"FIELD1;FIELD2") desc = arcpy.Describe("out_layer_name") t = arcpy.mapping.TableView(desc.name) arcpy.CopyRows_management(t, "myoutputtable")
... View more
10-26-2014
10:58 AM
|
3
|
0
|
2001
|