IDEA
|
It is really great to see geodatabase schema reporting aspect of X-Ray incorporated as a tool shipped with Pro! However please note this is only part of the X-Ray feature set we are looking for. We also need to change the models, not just report on them.
... View more
04-30-2024
09:40 AM
|
0
|
0
|
671
|
POST
|
Enterprise Architect seems to designed only for v10 era, not Pro. The newest EA webinars for ArcGIS are from 2015 (and the videoes themselves have succumbed to link rot). That said, the GDB structure hasn't changed fundamentally in Pro so it'll probably work well enough. Paying for something that out date though... not so much. (Unless taking advantage of the non-arcgis parts as well).
... View more
04-30-2024
09:24 AM
|
0
|
0
|
627
|
POST
|
...add one more to the list of folks who are getting "no compatible maps found" message, and have confirmed that both S123 Connect and S123 app have Standard Map enabled under Settings.
... View more
04-25-2024
11:05 AM
|
1
|
0
|
783
|
POST
|
I ran into this too. GDB in SQL Server 2019 seem to be ok with indexing enabled, but regular db are invisible. In Sql Server 2016 and Oracle 19c both db and gdb are empty. Thank you Esri Canada's Sukhjit P. for putting me on the right track with this thread. Solving this was a multiday endeavour.
... View more
04-17-2024
09:51 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2192
|
IDEA
|
I've since located a UI path that's simpler than what I outlined above: there's a 'clear limits' button on the Feature Layer ribbon. This is good for my overall sanity, but still different from what this idea is about. The button is to clear limits on a single layer at a time, and the old values are lost. The idea is about simply toggling the limits on/off for all layers at once, though now that I think about it, it would be better as "all selected layers in ToC".
... View more
02-22-2024
11:37 AM
|
0
|
0
|
596
|
IDEA
|
I work a lot with layers that have Visibility Ranges set so they do or don't show in or out beyond certain zoom levels. This is a handy and needed feature. However I also very frequently, daily, need to remove the scale visibility for the duration of some task. It would be very useful to have a button, in the View ribbon perhaps, to toggle the Visibility Range settings on/off, so we don't have to "select layer >> properties >> General >> delete min >> delete max >> Ok" again and again. And then add them back again when finished the task.
... View more
02-22-2024
11:11 AM
|
0
|
1
|
657
|
POST
|
As often happens, the process of properly writing a question reveals a path to the answer. In this case: look a the metadata for the oracle spatial view and see of the Processing History has useful information. It does! Geoprocessing history Process Process name ...snip... Command issued: RegisterWithGeodatabase "Database Connections\..." which leads us to Register With Geodatabase: Registers feature classes, tables, views, and raster layers with the geodatabase. Registering is used for data created in the database with third-party tools using SQL or in ArcGIS Pro with tools that do not register with the geodatabase (Create Unregistered Feature Class, Create Unregistered Table, and Create Database View tools). Only limited functionality is available from ArcGIS clients and services for data is that is not registered. Registration stores information about the items—such as table and column names, spatial extent, and geometry type—in the geodatabase's system tables. This allows the registered items to participate in geodatabase functionality.
... View more
02-15-2024
11:47 AM
|
1
|
0
|
953
|
POST
|
What specfically is a "database feature class", as distinct from "feature class"? For example in Catalog here we see 3 layers in an enterprise sql server geodatabase. The bottom and top ones are regular polyon feature classes created the regular way. The middle one is also a polygon layer, but is created with the Create Database View geoprocessing tool. All 3 of them can be added to a Map in Pro and they behave identically in the map as far as we can tell for symbology, labelling, selection, etc. Why does Catalog not see the view as Polygon type? In another ent-gdb I have access that is oracle hosted instead of sql server there are spatial view layers, but they area seen the same as normal FC. I don't know how these oracle spatial views were created. How do we get our sql server database views to be recognised as layers with geometry types before adding them to a map?
... View more
02-15-2024
11:38 AM
|
0
|
6
|
961
|
IDEA
|
It's good to see this is now in the Product Plan, thanks @SusanTran . Please pass on: while they're working in this module, also increase detail in the warning and error messages that are produced. For instance what brought to me to revisit this idea today is that both Ribbon and GP packaging tools are are failing on sharing a particular project. The message simply says "Failed to consolidate project due to problem with Geoprocessing History item: Package Layer." There are many items in the history for "Package Layer". Which one is it? If the job number or date or something was included in the message I wouldn't have to go through the slow method of removing them one by one to identify the culprit.
... View more
02-08-2024
02:16 PM
|
0
|
0
|
643
|
POST
|
Hardlinking individual files between separate file geodatabases will definitely cause corruption of one or more of the geodatabases, it would be a matter of when and not if. Thank you for confirming. I thought this might be the case but wasn't sure. You're right that changing workflow is the <strike>better</strike> only real solution. I first started raising the alarm over "this is a workflow problem" 10 years ago when we were bumping against 2 TB. Twice since then the chosen mitigation has been "buy bigger servers" so now we're at 22 TB on a 24 TB volume, having the same conversation again. Whee.
... View more
12-28-2023
01:02 PM
|
0
|
0
|
630
|
POST
|
Thanks for that clarification Joshua, and drawing out that Randy and my scenarios are different. I was using the language of the reporting tool, Tree Size Pro, which uses 'deduplicating' when it's talking about hard linking (ref). So we are asking very different questions. Mine is: is hardlinking file-gdb files a la Tree Size Pro deduplication dangerous?
... View more
12-28-2023
10:13 AM
|
0
|
2
|
636
|
POST
|
How did this work out Randy? Our file reporting tool is finding terabytes of duplicate files within file-gdb directories but I'm not sure I believe it. Or better said as: I trust that the contents of these reported dupes are currently identical, but I'm concerned that replacing the duplicates with hardlinks to a single source will mean that when ArcGIS changes one of them, that will cascade through all the others, and that would almost certainly be wrong.
... View more
12-28-2023
07:28 AM
|
0
|
4
|
643
|
POST
|
Yes please! This topic is worth exploring. I'm also interested in whether this spatial queries have the same performance profile, in general, across DB vendor types. For example are PostGIS and SQL Spatial using their native spatial types equally slower than in-client location queries? Assuming they are similar, what exactly is happening to slow things down?
... View more
12-19-2023
09:14 AM
|
1
|
2
|
1173
|
POST
|
that link is " Sorry, the page you are trying to access has either been archived or you are unable to access with the account you are logged in with."
... View more
11-16-2023
03:10 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2416
|
Title | Kudos | Posted |
---|---|---|
1 | 04-25-2024 11:05 AM | |
1 | 05-27-2024 11:43 AM | |
1 | 03-03-2021 02:45 PM | |
1 | 05-22-2024 10:21 AM | |
1 | 05-06-2024 09:18 AM |
Online Status |
Offline
|
Date Last Visited |
05-27-2024
12:48 PM
|