Latest Contributions by JoelBennett

The JSON provided does not match the definition of a UniqueValueRenderer object, and therefore cannot be read.  Instead, it provides the definition for a renderer of type "CIMUniqueValueRenderer" for which the SDK doesn't appear to have any support. ... View more

I see...I thought you were using the widget, but you're actually using the map component.  I'm afraid I don't presently have any further advice in that case. ... View more

Yes, you can use the undocumented method "_zoomToClicked" to simulate a click on the "Zoom to" button: floorFilter._zomToClicked();   Note that because this is an undocumented feature, it may be changed or removed in a future version of the SDK without notice. ... View more

You will likely get better results if you use the fromJSON method of the esri/renderers/support/jsonUtils module instead. ... View more

I will answer #2 up front - yes, you can enable this for all layers in your application.  In order to do so, add the following before loading the SDK (e.g. in your codepen, I added it between lines 8 and 9): <script type="text/javascript"> window.esriConfig = { has: { "featurelayer-advanced-symbols": true } }; </script>   Moving to #3, no, there's no official documentation I know of for this, including even the ability to add these flags (see also this post).  As a result, I can't answer #1 either.  As for #4, the best I can offer is to try it out and see what happens... ... View more

This statement is somewhat ambiguous: "I have updated the JSON definition of the layer to return a max record count of 5000".  If that's something you've done on the client-side, I could see why it may not make a difference.  Client-side queries will be constrained no matter what by the maximum allowed by the service being queried.  For example, this layer used by one of the samples has a "Max Record Count" of 1000, and nothing can be done on the client-side to override that.  If you have control of the service in question, and have configured the max to your liking, then it must be a different issue.  If so, checking the Search component's maxResults property, or the LayerSearchSource object's maxResults property might be a good place to start. ... View more

I've not done this with Portal, but I have with ArcGIS Server, and I suppose the differences would be marginal.  Once published to either, I suspect that the piece on the client side would be pretty much the same as well: Create a PrintTemplate object set with the name of your layout in the layout property. Create a PrintParameters object with the template property set to the object created in step 1. Use the print module to execute a request using the object created in step 2. ... View more

You might be looking for this: https://developers.arcgis.com/javascript/latest/references/map-components/ I suppose it would typically be arrived at by going to the ArcGIS Maps SDK for JavaScript documentation, clicking "References" near the top-right, and then clicking the Map Components tile. ... View more

As seen in the documentation, point objects don't have an extent (the value of their extent property is null).  You might want to built a single MultiPoint object from the points returned by your query and zoom to it instead. ... View more

The updated 4.33 download is now available. ... View more

The absence of a method in the SDK to generate a JSON object in webmap specification appears intentional.  Are you needing the map information in the webmap JSON format, or would perhaps something similar suffice?  I ask because it's fairly easy to get hold of a web_map_as_json object generated by the print module and used as input to the printing service.  It's not the same as the webmap specification, but includes much of the same info. ... View more

@Noah-Sager The download for 4.33 appears to be just another file for 4.32.  For example, all of the js files have the line: // See https://js.arcgis.com/4.32/esri/copyright.txt for details. (note the "4.32" in the path), and many of the files reported to be added in 4.33 are not present.  Could you please look into this? ... View more