|
POST
|
Great, you're welcome. I think life would be simpler if the software just created a feature class directly from the text file.
... View more
06-27-2017
02:41 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1479
|
|
POST
|
Without knowing the particulars, this workflow might be reasonable: Convert your XY layer to a feature class. Call it SurveyTopoAsIs or something like that. It's your real data from the csv. Make additional copies of the feature class as needed with the Copy Features tool. Name these SurveyTopoWhatIfA, SurveyTopoWhatIfB, etc. Edit these copies as you want to model alternative scenarios.
... View more
06-26-2017
03:38 PM
|
2
|
2
|
1479
|
|
POST
|
Hi Travis, When you make an XY layer from a standalone txt or csv table, the layer table doesn't have an OBJECTID field--as you noted. Also, the table is not editable. You're not doing anything wrong. That's how the software works. To make it editable, you have to export the XY layer to a feature class. You said "I won't be able to do what I need to if I store the data in a real table and then edit it." What is that you need to do? Tim
... View more
06-26-2017
12:24 PM
|
0
|
4
|
3205
|
|
POST
|
Hi Matthew, try this: In the Contents pane, right-click the map name and click Properties. In the Map Properties dialog box, on the General tab, there's a Rotation setting. Pick or type the value you want. Click OK.
... View more
06-16-2017
08:35 AM
|
2
|
1
|
7887
|
|
POST
|
Hi, When you start ArcGIS Pro, did you see a sign-in screen before the Licensing dialog box appeared? The sign-in screen looks like the image below. (Also, if you click OK on the Licensing dialog box, it should bring you to this sign-in screen.) You need to sign in with a username and password from your trial organization. The user must be a Level 2 user with an ArcGIS Pro license from the steps you followed in Activate ArcGIS Pro licenses for your organization. When you try to sign in on the sign-in screen what happens to you?
... View more
06-12-2017
09:42 AM
|
1
|
1
|
4187
|
|
POST
|
Hi, the map should still be in your project. In the Project pane, expand Maps. You should see it listed there. Right-click it and click Open.
... View more
06-08-2017
11:21 AM
|
10
|
0
|
22510
|
|
POST
|
Hi Kamal, there is a tutorial on Pro documentation site for how to create a new feature class/layer from scratch. It applies to point features but the principle is the same. Take a look, see if it helps. Create points on a map. It will take you 20 maybe 30 minutes. There are many other Pro tutorials for new users there as well. Tim
... View more
03-15-2017
03:12 PM
|
0
|
0
|
40388
|
|
POST
|
Hi Henry, There is a series of introductory ArcGIS Pro tutorials in the documentation that may help you feel more comfortable with Pro. Tim
... View more
03-07-2017
11:01 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1995
|
|
POST
|
Maribeth Price wrote: As I work with Pro, I am developing a new mind set and new workflows, and am reluctantly beginning to see some of the advantages. Yup, that's what happens.
... View more
02-03-2017
09:55 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3049
|
|
POST
|
Hi Alex, it seems to be working as expected for me.
... View more
01-27-2017
03:02 PM
|
1
|
0
|
2336
|
|
POST
|
Hi, you can do it by putting the image URLs in the attribute table, as you suggested. Then configure the layer pop-ups like this: Right-click the layer on the Contents pane and choose Configure Pop-ups. At the top of the Pop-ups pane, click Image. Click the pencil icon to edit the image properties. In the Image Options, click in the Source URL box. Click the Field drop-down menu and choose the field name from your table that stores the image URLs. In this example, the field name is IMAGE_URL, but it can be whatever you want. Click the Back button on the Pop-ups pane to apply the changes. Now you should see the unique images associated with your features in the pop-ups. Tim
... View more
01-23-2017
11:05 AM
|
2
|
1
|
1862
|
|
POST
|
I would also guess it's the version. I think animation was added at Pro version 1.2. See this help topic, under the Mapping and visualization section: What's new in ArcGIS Pro 1.2—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS for Desktop.
... View more
12-16-2016
08:36 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2841
|
|
POST
|
Note that Ellen wants to keep some attributes from the original feature class--those that don't have equivalents in the updated attribute table. Where there is no update, she wants to keep the existing values; where there is an update she wants to replace the existing values; where the feature is new, she wants to append it. At least that's how I'm reading the second part of her question.
... View more
10-17-2016
08:26 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2327
|
|
POST
|
I recommend Understanding GIS: An ArcGIS Project Workbook (2nd edition). I was one of the writers, so this comment may seem biased (check Amazon reviews). The book is somewhat dated--last tested on ArcGIS 10.2 for Desktop, so it's a couple of releases behind. But it should still hold up well. Getting to Know ArcGIS Desktop (4th edition) and GIS Tutorial 1 (6th edition) are very popular and well-regarded intro workbooks. You'll learn a lot from any one of these three. Tim
... View more
08-06-2016
03:08 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1982
|
|
POST
|
Merge (as Dan suggested) or Append are standard tools for getting features from different datasets into the same dataset. I looked at your data and these tools are not appropriate for your case because your datasets have many overlaps. You'll get duplicate geometry at these locations--two features in the same place. The Identity tool (one of the Overlay tools) will work better because it won't create duplicate geometry. If Zoning is used as the input features and Future Landuse is used as the identity features, the output will have Future Landuse geometry wherever there are future landuse features and Zoning geometry wherever there are only Zoning features. CAUTION! Your datasets don't align neatly and your output will contain lots of sliver polygons--places where a little fragment of a zoning polygon is mostly but not completely overlapped by landuse polygons. Also, the attributes of your datasets don't match. You'll have lots of null values in your output table. That isn't a crisis, but it could be a problem that the values in your zoning categories don't correspond to the values in your landuse categories. In other words, your output dataset will be a continuous polygon coverage, like you want, but it will also be helter-skelter with respect to geometry and attributes. I don't know what your objective is, but I think you might reconsider trying to manufacture land-use polygons out of zoning polygons when the datasets come from different sources and weren't designed to be used together. Sometimes GIS tools give us more power than we should have.
... View more
02-25-2016
09:40 AM
|
2
|
1
|
3731
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 08-08-2025 04:19 PM | |
| 1 | 05-21-2025 12:23 PM | |
| 1 | 04-22-2025 02:44 PM | |
| 1 | 12-06-2024 02:32 PM | |
| 1 | 01-04-2022 04:07 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
a month ago
|