Latest Contributions by TonghuiMing

This ability has been supported in the June 2025 AGOL release, with a new option in the Map Layers widget, [Change symbols for layers generated at runtime]: See the details of supported layer types here: https://doc.arcgis.com/en/experience-builder/latest/configure-widgets/map-layers-widget.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_6455DA56764045708EFB26F2516765FB  Note that if the original layer has symbols with variance, such as clustering as shown above, changing the symbol would remove those customizations. ... View more

The new option "Image viewer" has been provided to support this. You can zoom and pan when checking the expanded image in the modal: The allowed zoom level is 10% to 1000% of the original size. ... View more

Similar to https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-experience-builder-questions/custom-filter-widget-to-reset-filter/m-p/1540163/highlight/true#M14970  ... View more

@DougBrowning It is because WAB uses API 3.x, which does not separate tables, basemaps, and layers - they appear together. In API 4.x, these are separated as individual components and handle different cases. ... View more

@DougBrowning The current behavior of ExB Map Layers > Show tables is the result of combining these two (as shown in your original screenshot). This is the best we can do at this time, given the core capabilities supported. ... View more

We are definitely aiming to provide better user experiences, but in the scenarios mentioned above, the cases are a bit different. For example, providing options for each group individually - this option is designed to fulfill cases where many users want to quickly check or uncheck all the layers once, instead of checking them one by one. If they have ~100 layers, options for each group do not introduce the desired better UX; yet, they are the same - users would need to click ~100 times to enable each group. Checking only the first level is not a supported behavior across Esri products, which means this is a tailored new UX that could disrupt other users' regular workflow. I understand that it could be a bit frustrating that we could not provide this feature any time soon, but we need to make sure any options we add to the OOTB widget do not break other users' cases. It would be possible if you try the developer edition, which could give more opportunities to customize the behavior of the widget. Here is one of the custom widgets developed by the community users, which might cover your second scenario - https://community.esri.com/t5/experience-builder-custom-widgets/map-layers-widget-custom-1-17/m-p/1602060    Thanks, ... View more

 I am not sure why tables are forced to be separate? @DougBrowning The main reason is, in the API, the table and layer are classified in different arrays. This is not something we can control on the application's side, unfortunately. You will notice the layerList and tableList are separate widgets, and the same as in MV, with two individual options:   ... View more

Hi @Thomas1, unfortunately, we do not plan to support either of these two UX - only checking the first level, or providing options for each group individually. ... View more

@JeetzPatel The original app uses a List widget (grid layout arrangement), which is then configured with framework-level message actions: Map widget > Zoom to & Filter. ... View more

@LakshmiRajeevKumar Do you have any samples to share? Also, what is the main difference of the language setting - is it the browser, user profile language/locale setting? ... View more

11.5 or later. ... View more

Hi @MelissaSullivan, thanks for pointing that out. Yes, these are two different issues. The original one is a bug, causing the image attachment not to show as expected. Regarding the one you mentioned, it is the current behavior indeed, and we are also aware of it. They will probably not be resolved in the same release since the latter is trickier. We will keep a note of this and notify you when it gets fixed. ... View more

@AndreaRoskelley @MelissaSullivan  This is basically because, when you change the record, the text reflects the update immediately since it shows the record info itself, but the attachment needs extra requests to display the updated image. There is some time lag between these two, and thus, this defect. We will address this and probably for the next upcoming release.  Sorry for the inconvenience, and thanks for your help. ... View more

Hi @JasonBOCQUET, what are your environment details (version, etc.), and do you have a sample to share? ... View more