|
POST
|
You can remove the layer MakeFeatureLayers is creating using the removeLayer method for your Map.
... View more
10-24-2024
07:06 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3158
|
|
POST
|
Make Feature Layer produces a feature layer, rather than a feature class, so out_layer cannot be directed to the "memory" workspace. Your call to MakeFeatureLayer is actually creating a feature layer that ends up with the name of "memory\boecFL". If you examine the Properties for "memory\boecFL" in your table of contents, then you should see under Source that its Data Source is the original boec feature class from which it was derived, rather than a feature class named boecFL in the memory workspace. You'll note the documentation for Make Feature Layer states, "The [output] layer that is created is temporary and will not persist after the session ends unless the layer is saved to disk or the map document is saved." I suspect this wording is a holdover from the days of ArcMap, and needs updating for Pro. In Pro, the temporary output layer generated by Make Feature Layer is persisted when you save your project. So the only way to not persist the layer is to close Pro without saving your project, after you've run Make Feature Layer. (Side note: depending on what your goal is here, the SelectLayerByAttribute step may be extraneous. You can specify an expression directly in MakeFeatureLayer. In which case the resulting temporary layer would be ready for your insert step as-is.)
... View more
10-24-2024
05:35 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3165
|
|
POST
|
Whether I'm logged in or not, some user's avatars are showing as broken links. When I am logged in, my own avatar in the top-right corner is showing as a broken link. It also shows a broken link on the Avatars tab when I go to my settings. I have not changed my avatar in long time.
... View more
10-23-2024
06:55 AM
|
0
|
19
|
6077
|
|
IDEA
|
A variety of ArcGIS Online content is often combined into a final product. For example, feature layers into a web map, or a web map into an instant app. While each of the components needs to be shared in a way that the target audience has access to them individually in ArcGIS Online, the overall goal is to have the audience view the final product, the web map or instant app. We would like the ability to add an optional redirect to a content item, which would redirect users to the intended final product under certain conditions. For example, for an instant app, users attempting to view an individual feature layer used in a web map used in an instant app, or for the web map itself, could be redirected to the instant app. As one might be collaborating on the content with others, the redirect would only be honored under certain conditions. For example, if the user attempting to view an item with a redirect was not logged in, then they would be redirected. Or, if they were logged in, then the would be able to view the item if they were a member of a Shared Update group with which the item was shared; otherwise, they would be redirected to the intended content. The owner of the item, when logged in, would always be able to view the individual content. StoryMaps, Dashboards, Experiences, and other aggregate content types would benefit from this redirect capability. Why is this capability needed? When creating aggregate content, authors may reuse content names. For example, in the case of an instant app, the feature layer and web map used in an instant app, and the app itself, may all have the same or similar names. So users searching for the the instant app by name in ArcGIS Online on an ArcGIS Hub will see all three listed in their results, and the instant app may not be at the top of the list. Also, if the user is not familiar with ArcGIS, they many not know which link is the one they were intended to open. By setting a redirect on the feature layer and web map, the author would ensure the user ends up viewing the instant app, no matter which link they clicked. It could also help with searching if an item with redirects to it was listed higher in the search results than items which redirect to it.
... View more
10-23-2024
06:25 AM
|
5
|
1
|
642
|
|
IDEA
|
I would like a way to identify which users are responsible for Data Store Resource usage. The graph currently available to ArcGIS Online Administrators shows over all usage in an organization, however, I would like to be able to break that data down, and identify which individual users are driving that usage. In a large organization it is not feasible for Administrators to ask individual users what they are doing. Rather, Administrators need a way to identify users who are responsible for significant levels of Data Store Resource usage. This would enable Administrators to contact such users and discuss whether their usage is appropriate and/or if alternatives need to be explored, such as upgrading the data store, moving the data elsewhere, etc.
... View more
10-22-2024
11:49 AM
|
5
|
0
|
535
|
|
POST
|
While it used to be the case that you could only view a resource usage chart for Premium Feature Data Stores, it was made available (October 2023 update?) for Standard Feature Data Stores as well. One way to determine which you have is to look below the "Feature Data Store" link you clicked on to open the chart. It should indicated Standard or Premium, next to the storage used value.
... View more
10-18-2024
05:54 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1893
|
|
IDEA
|
We often have similar use cases, where we want the user to go to something specific, and not the parts that make it up. Not necessarily for security concerns, but more about getting the end user to the right place. Things like getting the user to the Instant app, not the web map or layers used in the instant app Perhaps a way to address such use cases would be to enable the user to specify a redirect for an item. If they try to open the Web Map used in an Instant App, the user would be automatically redirected to the Instant App. Or, if they tried to open a feature layer used in a web map, then they would be directed to the web map; and, on to the instant app, if a redirect was set for that. It would still be helpful for some use cases for the user to able to view the item details for a component, so they would still be able to get to that page. The redirect for would be for URLs for "viewing" the content, such as opening a web map or feature layer in the map viewer, opening the data or visualization tab for a feature layer, etc. The redirect could be to send users to Dashboards or Experiences as well. If user tries to view a layer you've used in a dashboard, then the author could set a redirect for that layer to send the user to the Dasbhoard.
... View more
10-17-2024
10:29 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2063
|
|
POST
|
In a typical Jupyter Notebook environment, after entering a function name, you can press SHIFT+TAB to view the method's signature. I believe this is what you are looking for. Pressing TAB by itself is used for autocompletion. For example, after entering an object name followed by a period, pressing TAB will list autocomplete choices for that object.
... View more
10-13-2024
08:29 AM
|
0
|
0
|
887
|
|
POST
|
Are your "ArcGIS Online account" and their "ArcGIS Professional account" both part of the same ArcGIS Online organization? If they are, then yes, you can change ownership of an ArcGIS StoryMap from one user to another. The URL for the StoryMap would not change. Changing ownership of an item, however, is only possible within an ArcGIS Online organization. If your two accounts are hosted by different ArcGIS Online organizations, then changing ownership of the StoryMap would not be an option. Instead you would need to transfer a copy of the StoryMap from your ArcGIS Online organization to their ArcGIS Online organization via ArcGIS Assistant, the clone_items method in the ArcGIS API for Python, etc. Unfortunately, regardless of how you transfer the StoryMap between organizations, the item ID, hence the URL, for the copy of the StoryMap hosted by their organization would be different.
... View more
10-10-2024
08:52 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1753
|
|
POST
|
query has an aggregation parameter, which by default is set to DataStoreAggregation.SUM. Since you are not overriding that value, I believe your code is producing a value that is the aggregated sum of per-minute data over the course of an hour. I haven't found where the aggregation parameter values are explicitly documented, however, through autocompletion, it appears the possible values are: So you will want to add aggregation=DataStoreAggregation.AVG to your call, if you want to see the average CPU utilization over one hour on the expected scale of 0-100%. On a side note, if you are doing this to evaluate how much time your organization utilization is at 100%, and users are experiencing unexpected delays, then you probably want to capture this data at the minute scale. Then you can retrospectively look, for example, at how many minutes over a day your utilization was pegged at 100%, as well as how many consecutive minutes it was pegged at 100%. If those numbers get bigger than your users' tolerance for waiting for results or receiving timeout errors, then you likely want to upgrade your Feature Data Store, or identify what is maxing things out so that you can work with users on potential alternative workflows to reduce utilization.
... View more
10-10-2024
07:33 AM
|
1
|
0
|
1888
|
|
IDEA
|
I would also encourage Esri to consider this Idea with regards to the whole ArcGIS ecosystems. I think better feedback would help set users up for success, rather than failure.
... View more
10-09-2024
06:42 AM
|
0
|
0
|
656
|
|
POST
|
Is it possible that your export request would exceed the 150,000 tile limit on the World Imagery (for export) service? You can use the REST API to estimate the number of tiles your request would require: https://tiledbasemaps.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World_Imagery/MapServer/estimateExportTilesSize If the number of tiles would exceed the limit, then a possible workaround is to use tessellation to break up your extent into chunks that would individually stay below the limit. Export those chunks one-a-time, with a sleep in between to play well with others and avoid overloading the service, put all of the exports into a single tile cache, and export the tile cache into a tile package. (You can also do the same thing with the World imagery for export layer using arcpy, i.e., GenerateTessellation, CopyRaster with a pause in between each, add the copied rasters to a mosaic, and create your tile package from the mosaic.)
... View more
10-09-2024
06:24 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2121
|
|
POST
|
[Posting for other who might run into this issue and need a workaround.] When creating a Map tour by uploading geotagged photos, it is not straightforward to manually adjust the location of images with overlapping location data. One has to hide the slides for overlapping tour points in order to be able select, delete, and re-position the pin for the tour point who's location you want to update. If you don't hide the other slides, then when you click on Edit location, you will not be able select the current slide's point. How would you end up with overlapping geotagged photos? One example is taking photos of objects or documents for which you want to make a Map tour, and you take the photos in your office. When you upload the images, they will initially all be located on top of each other in the location of your office, if you had geotagging turned on when you took the photos. Your goal, however, is to edit the locations on the objects' or documents' slides, after you've initially created the Map tour. In order to update the points in your Map tour: Hide all of the Map tour slides with overlapping locations, except the one you want to move. Now when you click on "Edit location", and you will be able to select the point's location, delete it, and set the correct location. Unhide the next overlapping tour point, and repeat the steps above. Alternatively, you can strip the geolocation information from your photos before you upload them. Then you can manually place each one via Edit location, rather than having to deal with initially overlapping locations.
... View more
10-03-2024
07:19 AM
|
2
|
0
|
645
|
|
IDEA
|
When assigning a custom role through New member defaults, we would like the custom role to be able to have the privileges for “Generate API keys” (portal:user:generateApiTokens) and “Assign privileges to OAuth 2.0 applications” (portal:user:assignPrivilegesToApps). These are not admin privileges, which has been cited as the reason other privileges, like the ability to create Shared Update groups or link to SAML groups, are not compatible with New member defaults. This would enable our users to manage their own apps’ authentication and privileges. Our current workaround is to have a schedule task that checks for new users. When it finds a new user that was assigned a custom role without those privileges by New member defaults, it then changes their role to a custom role that includes that privilege (and other privileges that are not compatible with New member defaults.) (This is related to Make ‘create group with update capabilities’ a non-admin privilege.)
... View more
09-27-2024
08:37 AM
|
1
|
0
|
447
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thursday | |
| 3 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 4 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 2 | 04-24-2026 05:42 AM | |
| 1 | 04-23-2026 08:00 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Tuesday
|