|
IDEA
|
Total agree with this and believe Esri Inc need to release the next parts AD/SAML functionality ASAP. I'm happy they have a road map for implementation but not a road map of implementing a small feature, taking a 2-3year hiatus, next small enhancement, etc, etc. They've made the commitment and lets see it fully implemented of 2-3 releases unless there is a technology limitation
... View more
04-26-2020
04:37 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1481
|
|
POST
|
Filip, I'm working on a Utility Network project and we have created a read only user within SQL Server 2016 to access the schema that the utility network resides in. This was development by our implementation partner SQL to execute USE [<db_name>] CREATE USER [<RO username>] FOR LOGIN [<RO username>] WITH DEFAULT_SCHEMA=[<UN schema name>] GRANT SELECT ON SCHEMA :: [<UN schema name>] TO [<RO username>] Good luck
... View more
04-22-2020
05:42 AM
|
1
|
1
|
1828
|
|
POST
|
Ryan, It's just the way Esri has done the security model relating to the UtilityNetwork. You'll have to log in as the user who created the UtilityNetwork. There is a tool to transfer ownership but it's a pain to use, stopping/starting service, etc.
... View more
04-09-2020
11:42 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1617
|
|
POST
|
Ryan, In the 'untools' toolbox there should a gp tool to export the asset package. Give that a go. Good luck
... View more
03-30-2020
06:27 AM
|
0
|
5
|
4361
|
|
POST
|
Not sure what you are trying to do but Utility Network doesn't work with ArcMap its only ArcGIS Pro
... View more
03-16-2020
04:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
613
|
|
POST
|
Daniel, Here is the AGOL site (Ergon Energy) for the electricity utility I work for in Queensland, Australia. We publish very basic information of the network & a few other maps relating to where Ergon has incentive programs, etc. Regards
... View more
02-29-2020
12:20 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1575
|
|
POST
|
Will, Thank you for testing this. We just need the MBR geometry changed to a buffer geometry and everything will be great
... View more
02-25-2020
04:34 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1154
|
|
POST
|
Will, Is there any limit on how far the scale can be? In your example of 0.01 decimal degree, this would be approx. 1 sq kilometre. I would be thinking of 1 sq metre (similar to 1 sq feet in Naperville demo data) so the factor would need to be around 0.00001. Good work on the testing so far. Thanks
... View more
02-25-2020
01:33 PM
|
1
|
2
|
1154
|
|
POST
|
Michael, I always have had issues with the deployment tool. Maybe because ArcGIS Pro sits behind a corporate firewall/forward proxy. The way I do it is long winded but works Go to AGOL - Utility Solutions Deployment items Find the Viewer map and open it in ArcGIS Pro Change the source of the layers Save as my own Pro Project Publish the map to Portal. Good luck
... View more
01-30-2020
03:12 PM
|
0
|
0
|
685
|
|
POST
|
Maria, You don't have to use their data. The Asset Package is only a use case of what can be done. I'm on a project at the moment for a Electricity Distribution Utility and we are creating our own version of the Asset Package as the Esri Inc demo isn't suitable for Australian Electricity Utilities. We are redefining all aspects of the package (eg. asset group, asset type, attributes, containment rules, connectivity rules, etc.)
... View more
01-13-2020
02:31 PM
|
1
|
0
|
873
|
|
POST
|
Hi all, I'm trying to find out if this scenario is possible in the UNF. In the Electricity industry we have High Voltage Switchboard/Switchgear that contain Circuit Breakers/Current Transformers (Devices), Busbars (Line) & Connections to Busbar (Junctions) as an example. The equipment would be considered to be contained within the switchboard (eg. Assembly). There also could be another requirement to logically group the equipment (eg device, line) together based on the function (eg. outgoing feeder, tx). Since there is no OOTB logical grouping provided by the UNF other than containment which only permits 1 containment within the network domain (eg. device contained within the assembly). Also, the logical grouping doesn't always apply to equipment contained within that switchboard as multiple switchboards can be connected together. Has anybody tried to come up with a solution for this other than extending the UNF by creating relationship classes, etc. Thank you for any time looking at this.
... View more
12-29-2019
08:57 PM
|
1
|
0
|
771
|
|
POST
|
Michael, Thank you for the link to the item within your git repo. The other rules in this repo are very interesting and will definitely be looking into some of these in the future. Just a quick question - How much overhead to the user do these cause? Especially when it comes to looking up values from other feature classes (eg. restrict editing rule looking up the user access from the fgdb)? Is the delay noticeable everything it fires on the insert/update/delete? Thanks
... View more
12-17-2019
02:03 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2726
|
|
POST
|
Forest, Keen to see who comes and comments here. I have seen a simple OH example in 3D from Brian Baldwin (Esri Inc) but nothing in UG yet
... View more
12-16-2019
05:24 PM
|
6
|
0
|
733
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 2 | 11-11-2025 07:59 PM | |
| 1 | 10-10-2025 08:03 PM | |
| 1 | 10-19-2025 08:18 PM | |
| 1 | 04-25-2025 07:07 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Monday
|