|
POST
|
Hi James. Thanks for your reply. Yes - sync capabilities are enabled. I'll contact Tech Support. I'll update the thread if i learn anything interesting about this.
... View more
03-19-2018
01:45 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2381
|
|
POST
|
Hello. We are no longer able to use the esri python API to create a replica on our survey's hosted feature layer. The error message we get looks like this: 03/14/2018 00:01:20 DEBUG arcgis._impl.connection RESPONSE: https://services2.arcgis.com/McQ0OlIABe29rJJy/arcgis/rest/services/service_<super-secret-code>/FeatureServer/createReplica, {"error":{"code":500,"message":"Unable to create replica. Please check your parameters.","details":["Error in creating runtime geodatabase."]}} 03/14/2018 00:01:20 ERROR arcgis._impl.connection Unable to create replica. Please check your parameters. 03/14/2018 00:01:20 ERROR arcgis._impl.connection Error in creating runtime geodatabase. Additionally, we are not able to export the hosted feature layer as a file geodatabase. We are able to export the hosted feature layer as a feature collection, geoJson, and shapefile. The hosted feature service does contain attachments (signatures and images). Perhaps co-incidentally (or not), this behavior started when we added the esri parameter: 'allowUpdates' to our repeats. Prior to setting that value we would run the 'create replica' routine nightly without error. Any thoughts? Thanks, Tom
... View more
03-19-2018
12:01 PM
|
0
|
6
|
3092
|
|
POST
|
Hi Philip. Thanks for taking a look at the survey, and clarifying the situation for me. I'll hang tight until the bug fixes and enhancement requests are in place.
... View more
03-01-2018
12:26 PM
|
1
|
0
|
4108
|
|
POST
|
Do you have an email address, dropbox, etc where I can send the survey xlsx?
... View more
02-27-2018
09:22 PM
|
0
|
1
|
4108
|
|
POST
|
Philip Wilson: I have a repeat with appearance set to minimal. There are no calculations within the repeat, but there is a text field that has a 'relevant' expression that depends on a field within the repeat. A new repeat record is always created - even when there isnt 'repeat' data. Is that also the expected behavior?
... View more
02-20-2018
12:24 PM
|
1
|
5
|
4108
|
|
POST
|
I am using the REST API method 'ApplyEdits' at the feature service level (version 10.4). I am trying to apply edits to multiple layers of the feature service in a single call. I am setting the 'rollbackOnFailure' parameter to true, and each layer in the feature service supports rollbackOnFailure. My reading of the REST API documentation is that if any of the edits fail, all the edits will fail: Description: Optional parameter to specify if the edits should be applied only if all submitted edits succeed. If false, the server will apply the edits that succeed even if some of the submitted edits fail. If true, the server will apply the edits only if all edits succeed. However, that is not the behavior i seeing. I have examples where edits on layer id 0 fail, but edits on layer id 1 succeed. Here is a typical response for the situation: [
{
"id": 0,
"addResults": [
{
"success": false,
"error": {
"code": 1020,
"description": "GlobalId field is missing."
}
}
],
"attachments": {
"addResults": [
],
"deleteResults": [
],
"updateResults": [
]
}
},
{
"id": 1,
"addResults": [
{
"objectId": 803,
"globalId": "{017b1b27-25b5-4e0a-9030-102224bc5601}",
"success": true
}
]
}
] Is there a bug in the system or with my reading comprehension? Is there some other setting that i need to set. We need an 'atomic' edit operation because the service has related data and we want to avoid situations where only some pieces of the data get submitted successfully. In the example above the 'related' data were successfully submitted but the origin/parent data were not. Now we are stuck with orphan data in the related table. Thank you.
... View more
02-12-2018
05:04 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1233
|
|
POST
|
As a quick update, after some additional investigation, Esri staff has confirmed that using the 'deleteFromDefinition' method does not successfully remove related tables from a hosted feature layer view. They are working on debugging the problem and hopefully a worked around until the bug is fixed.
... View more
01-26-2018
08:55 AM
|
1
|
9
|
7026
|
|
POST
|
I have re-created the view; it contains the three related tables. Do you have an email address or some other way that i can contact you directly so i can give you access to the view?
... View more
01-23-2018
02:13 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2887
|
|
POST
|
I have deleted all the related tables that i do not need in the view. I deleted the 3 related tables from the view first. I can make the view available to you if you'd like to look at it. Since it's a view, i can also start all over just to make sure that i followed the correct procedure. Let me know what you'd like me to try, or if there is any additional information you'd like. I can also re-open the support ticket i had opened for this question as well.
... View more
01-23-2018
01:16 PM
|
0
|
3
|
4141
|
|
POST
|
It turns out that the 'relationships' element is not removed from the view layer json. I discovered this because our maps which use the hosted feature layer of the view started reporting an error about missing table id=3. And "3" was the id of one of the related tables. When i went back to review the hosted feature services json, this is still there: "layers" : [ { ... "id" : 0, ... "relationships" : [ { "id" : 0, "name" : "", "relatedTableId" : 3, ... }, { "id" : 1, "name" : "", "relatedTableId" : 2, ... }, { "id" : 2, "name" : "", "relatedTableId" : 1, ... } ] } There is also a relationships element in the json of the hosted feature service's layer, i.e. <servicename>/0 How can i remove the relationships element from the service definition? thank you
... View more
01-23-2018
12:03 PM
|
0
|
0
|
4141
|
|
POST
|
I think i confused the issues. I apologize for that. Within my view, the 'main' layer, id=0, has a json element named 'relationships' which references the 3 related tables that i want to drop from the view. Do i need to remove that element (relationships) from the view definition as well? { "layers" : [ "id" : 0 ... "relationships" : [ { "id" : 0, "name" : "", "relatedTableId" : 3, }, { "id" : 1, "name" : "", "relatedTableId" : 2, }, { "id" : 2, "name" : "", "relatedTableId" : 1, } ], ... }
... View more
01-22-2018
01:13 PM
|
0
|
2
|
4141
|
|
POST
|
In the source\origin layer definition do i need to drop the 'relationships' element?
... View more
01-22-2018
01:01 PM
|
0
|
4
|
4141
|
|
POST
|
Hello. We have a private hosted feature layer that has 3 related tables. We want to make some of the 'spatial' data available to the public, but we don't want any of the related data visible to the public. Is there a way to create a hosted feature layer view that excludes the related tables? I tried not including the join field in the list of fields for the view, but related tables and their data are still present in the view. thank you
... View more
01-19-2018
01:28 PM
|
0
|
29
|
10848
|
|
POST
|
Screen shots below. I am not sure how to upload the xls form. In the first screen shot, the 'All' checkbox is selected in the 'Set Visibility' dialog.
... View more
12-13-2017
08:49 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1343
|
|
POST
|
I followed the wonderful example by Carmel Connolly (Making Other Work Harder in Survey123 Results — Esri UK) to collate 'other responses' into a single field (Section 2), and it worked great..... except when i view the survey results in the Survey123 website. In the Analyze tab, i see a message which reads 'no questions are visible....' I clicked the Set Visibility button and selected the 'All' check box. Still no questions are visible. In the Data tab, when i click on an individual record, in the right hand pane i see the title of my survey and the 'submitted by' and 'submitted time' fields, but that is all. As a test, i changed the hidden field to 'text', republished the survey, and submitted some new responses. Now i can see all the responses in the Analyze and Data tabs. Is the Survey123 site supposed to hide the responses to 'hidden' questions?
... View more
12-12-2017
05:19 PM
|
0
|
4
|
1635
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 02-24-2021 12:15 PM | |
| 2 | 01-05-2026 10:04 AM | |
| 1 | 09-30-2025 01:30 PM | |
| 1 | 09-25-2025 07:37 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
2 weeks ago
|