Latest Contributions by RyanKoschatzky

"However, it would still be nice to be able to use the full suite of R&H tools on any portion of the route, whether it be on the loops or the line that connects them. It's relatively likely that the events will be edited again at some point." I agree with Andrew.  ... View more

Nathan Easley‌, Amit Hazra‌ Can you guys explain why running remove centerline duplication as part of load routes and not running remove centerline duplication as part of load route but running remove centerline duplication tool separate gives you different results? Is there a workflow to run remove centerline duplication only on the routes loaded and not the entire centerline FC or State in our case? Thanks. ... View more

@Joseph, after running the centerline duplication step, I would recommend checking the centerline fc for lasted edited records you touched to see if it is localized to your route. Running that process this morning, centerline duplication ran on the whole state and updated more records then intended.    ... View more

@Amit, does a generate events need to be run afterwards?  @Joseph, does the route that needs to be unretired have any coroutes? We are in the process of doing a load routes to fix incorrectly loaded routes from 2016 (v10.3) those routes had coroutes. At that time we had issues with coroutes so to fix that issue we are planning on loading all routes that overlap and any routes that overlap those routes in what we term "spider web effect".  We discovered in a previous system that while routes are separate, they are connected and with out chasing down all the strands you usually ran in problems with those downstream routes some time later.   ... View more

I am not going to say it cannot be but I have not seen that be an issue unless it was something unsupported like lollipop, alpha route, etc.  ... View more

Colin, I have seen that before, however our calibration points where further off the centerline then the tolerance and submitted a ticket in the past for it. As explained to us, in a number of cases you can just delete the calibration points.  As I recall these was an issue with pre 10.5.1 versions of the software.  To me maybe more concerning is centerline and milepoint are not coincident. It appears that someone has probably deleted some vertexes that where probably within tolerance and while they did probably run apply updates, it did not translate to milepoint so you have mismatch of vertexes on centerline and milepoint. I have found a cartographic realignment more then tolerance can fix the issue or if you are already running Generate Routes on the those that should fix the issue. I would test on a non production dataset and run Generate Routes with all concurrent routes otherwise you may run into an issue of duplicated centerlines. You can run the deduplicate tool but that also has it's own issues.  Removing duplicate centerline geometry—Roads and Highways Desktop | ArcGIS Desktop  Main one I recall from 2017 is unexpected event behaviors. Not sure if it changed the event measures or the values either way some events did not appear the same before and after.  ... View more

So for a Diverging Diamond, we model the geometry this way. A continuous flow intersection is looking more like this  Here are cad images of the pavement markings, the redline is the sheet break. The images are trying to show north of the intersection and south of the intersection.  ... View more

Welcome, that location would have been a nice to know 2 years ago when you guys hosted GIS-T.  I would be interested in seeing what you guys are creating. While I spend most my time with LRS data, I have been spending some time in in traffic safety space so we can better serve that group.  Another space to watch is Roads and Highways User Group (RHUG) ... View more