|
POST
|
Hi all, quick question. I have a large dataset that I am updating daily. The features themselves do not change, only the attribute data within it. I have tried a few methods but each has their drawbacks. Overwrite- Cannot do it because it is in a collaboration and sync is enabled. Join and multiple field calculates from within Pro- There are a bunch of fields in this, so manually field calculating each is pretty tiring. Delete features and append updates from within Pro- This is what I'm currently doing, however it creates a lot of downtime and with several thousand views a day I often get emails asking if the service is down. Python-ing it out- Probably my long term solution, however our Enterprise blocks the Python API access so I would ArcPy it in Pro. Anyone have better ideas on how to do this? It would be appreciated. Thanks!
... View more
05-16-2020
12:06 PM
|
0
|
0
|
570
|
|
POST
|
Good link, Mark. I'm definitely upvoting that. I'm playing around with the .usage() function that Katherine mentioned, looks like it could be promising. I'm definitely not familiar with the API so there's probably better ways to do this but plugging into a Notebook is giving good results so far. from arcgis.gis import GIS from IPython.display import display gis = GIS("home") items = gis.content.search(query="type:Feature Service") for item in items: try: itemHistory = item.usage(date_range='1Y', as_df=True) # <--- Looking in the past 12 months total = itemHistory['Usage'].sum() if total <20: # <--- Less than 20 total views display(item) except: pass
... View more
05-14-2020
10:24 AM
|
1
|
2
|
2790
|
|
POST
|
Hi all, would anyone know of a way to query the usage statistics in hosted feature services through any of the APIs to find items that haven't been used in 30, 90 days, etc?
... View more
05-13-2020
02:15 PM
|
0
|
5
|
2856
|
|
POST
|
We are publishing to our Enterprise, which is an Esri-managed Azure setup. Someone in Esri checked the logs for us and they said nothing stood out in the logs for why it was failing.
... View more
05-05-2020
07:12 AM
|
0
|
1
|
1520
|
|
POST
|
I have two SLPK files received from vendors. One is 4gb and the other is 20gb. When using the 'Share Package' tool in Pro to publish the larger layer out to our Portal I receive 'ERROR 002934: Failed to publish web layer'. It looks like the SLPK uploaded into My Contents but the publishing failed. The smaller file was published just fine. Am I hitting a size limit?
... View more
05-01-2020
05:33 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1610
|
|
POST
|
I've attached a screenshot of a typical polygon we've tried to input. I've tried all manner of shapes, and none seem to work.
... View more
01-31-2020
05:57 PM
|
0
|
1
|
4586
|
|
POST
|
I have a survey using geoshape however we are getting an error if we try to collect a new record. "24305: The polygon input is not valid because the ring does not have enough distinct points. Each ring much contain at least three distinct points." The polygons we are drawing *definitely* have more than 3 points. We have many records preloaded into the feature service and most of the work is done using the inbox. Updating those records has been no issue in the field. Other surveys using polygons have worked without a problem. Any ideas? Thanks!
... View more
01-17-2020
11:02 AM
|
1
|
21
|
9447
|
|
POST
|
You know it looks like our beloved IT department might have disabled webGL in an update earlier this week. Good catch there, thanks. Now I'll go fight that battle.
... View more
01-09-2020
09:41 AM
|
2
|
0
|
936
|
|
POST
|
Long time user of the classics but just now starting to try out the new story maps. However whenever I try to add *any* map anywhere into a story it just grays out. Any ideas?
... View more
01-09-2020
09:06 AM
|
0
|
2
|
972
|
|
POST
|
I was afraid this would be by design, which in most cases it does make sense. In my case however, I'm not worried about information being read only, just keeping the interface simple and unburdened with extra questions that don't fit the situation. I guess it would be nice if it would query a repeat on becoming relevant, not just query it when the form is opened and it's already visible. That would save me from having to break this into two separate forms.
... View more
10-03-2019
08:58 AM
|
0
|
0
|
681
|
|
POST
|
I'm trying to combine two forms into one by having an A or B selector at the top. Depending on which is selected, an appropriate repeat will appear. One is selected by default since it will be the most used. I have query and allowUpdates set in the parameters for both repeats so users can access previous records. However if one repeat becomes irrelevant, none of the records are queried back as soon as it becomes relevant again. So for instance, the form always starts with the A repeat and all records show just fine. But if B is selected, no records are returned and switching back to A has them all erased. Is there a better way to go about this? Thanks for any insight.
... View more
10-02-2019
07:18 AM
|
0
|
4
|
739
|
|
POST
|
I would like to add that this would be a major feature for us and really hope to see it in a coming release. Currently we get around it by using repeats on signatures however it really gums up the schema.
... View more
09-26-2019
06:05 AM
|
1
|
1
|
3180
|
|
POST
|
I have a user submitting a Survey123 web form using the new method for editing existing records. When he tried to submit his form it tells him "undefined- unable to apply edits". I am unable to reproduce this error and he has full editing rights to the feature layer. I've attached a copy of the xls form but with the external selects sheet removed. Anyone have any idea what is going on here? Thanks
... View more
09-23-2019
01:28 PM
|
0
|
1
|
718
|
|
POST
|
Thanks for the suggestion but I should have clarified. The label and name values are the same. The calculation itself works. The problem is is just runs regardless if its supposed to be relevant or not.
... View more
07-18-2019
07:06 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1379
|
|
POST
|
Hi James, I'm using 3.5 and I'm still seeing this behavior. I have a hidden field and if it becomes relevant, I want it to return one of two values, otherwise leave the original data in the field (since we heavily open past surveys up in the Inbox). I can't share my form but I'll show the relevant and calculation columns. Relevant Calculation ${tflOnsiteStatus}!='' if(${tflOnsiteStatus}='No Issue','No Issue','Unresolved') No matter what, it always returns "Unresolved", even if tflOnsiteStatus is blank. I have tried several different relevant expressions to see if any worked.
... View more
07-17-2019
08:19 PM
|
0
|
3
|
1379
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 05-06-2025 07:08 AM | |
| 2 | 02-26-2024 04:39 PM | |
| 1 | 05-13-2024 12:41 PM | |
| 1 | 06-05-2023 03:23 PM | |
| 1 | 02-03-2022 12:38 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
05-06-2025
07:06 AM
|