Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Cancel
- Home
- :
- About AngusHooper1
AngusHooper1
Frequent Contributor
since
04-18-2018
a week ago
146
Posts created
139
Kudos given
8
Solutions
139
Kudos received
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
My Ideas
(7 Idea Submissions)Latest Contributions by AngusHooper1
|
POST
|
Look at your console & network trace (developer tools in the browser) to see if any CORS or other common errors are raised when accessing the GPServer endpoint.
... View more
10-15-2019
07:12 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3340
|
|
POST
|
Morning, I have ArcGIS Monitor 10.7.1 monitoring several GIS' deployments. We have noticed that after a specific date & time, our 5 minute and 15 minute collections can randomly spike to take over 5 minutes. This is not too concerning for the 15 minute collection, but is clearly an issue for the 5 minute colleciton. Prior to this date/time, both collections were completing in under a minute. The date & time that this issue began on was a weekend and therefore an automated ICT issue is the likely cause (e.g. a windows patch rollout). Additionaly, when we receive the collection alerts, these align with a system counter that took a considerable time to collect and usually accounts for the increased collect time (e.g. a system collector for a singular VM took 320 seconds, 5 minute collection took 340 seconds). The VM that this system counter spikes/hangs on is random but it is always the system counter that is the underlying issue. As Monitor was 100% performing as expected before this specific date & time, is there any common culprits we should be looking into that could degrade the system counter from behaving as normal? Or, any windows changes that could impact the counter? Once again, these spikes in collection time only occur a couple times a day and do not necessarily align with expect load on the system aka during business hours.
... View more
10-03-2019
04:58 PM
|
0
|
1
|
477
|
|
POST
|
The geometry service that the Portal is configured to use is baked into the WAB app data. This is not configurable in the app, a widget or web map.
... View more
10-01-2019
09:04 PM
|
0
|
1
|
809
|
|
POST
|
Morning, I am trying to create a script that searches an items dependencies & data, finds legacy URL's/services and updates these to the new version of that URL/service. Example of script orig_data = item.getdata() new_data = orig_data.replace(old_url, new_url) item.update(item_properties=None, data=new_data, thumbnail=None, metadata=None) The outcome of this script, when used with WAB Apps, is the app breaking and returning an error page of "'False' is undefined". What is wrong with the above methodology for WAB Apps? Is there an alternative workflow to achieve the same end goal of updating legacy dependencies that are baked into a WAB App?
... View more
10-01-2019
07:47 PM
|
0
|
3
|
899
|
|
POST
|
Regarding Portal, is there anything stopping you from simply editing the federation urls (e/.g. private portal url) to https://dnsalias.domain.com...? You may find you also need to define the webcontexturl for Portal. I would be testing these configurations in a QA environment first as you will likely have to unfederate & federate several times to see which configuration provides the desired output. Regarding datastore, I also have these questions.
... View more
09-18-2019
07:16 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2018
|
|
POST
|
FYI - answered here https://community.esri.com/thread/239463-how-to-install-docker-desktop-on-windows-for-notebook-server-on-windows-2016. You need to use Docker Desktop 2.0.x not the current release of 2.1.x.
... View more
09-11-2019
08:19 PM
|
0
|
1
|
470
|
|
POST
|
Unfortunately, installing Docker Desktop 2.1.0.1 on Windows 2016 fails as the docker installer reports 'Installation failed: one prerequisitie is not fulfilled. Docker Desktop requires Windows 10 Pro or Enterprise version 15063 to run.' This error message aligns with the Docker documentation that Desktop requires windows 10 to install.
... View more
09-11-2019
05:42 PM
|
0
|
2
|
2175
|
|
POST
|
So to confirm, Engine is required if you are deploying Notebook Server onto a windows 2016/2019 machine?
... View more
09-11-2019
04:01 PM
|
0
|
4
|
2175
|
|
POST
|
Just to expand on this point, if Docker for Desktop is documented (by Docker) as only being available/supported for Windows 10, how can we deploy ArcGIS Notebook Server on a Windows 2016/2019 server? The Esri documentation references Docker runtime 17.0+ as the supported version which does not align with "Docker for Desktop". ArcGIS Notebook Server system requirements—ArcGIS Enterprise system requirements | ArcGIS Enterprise Then, the Esri documentation references Docker for Desktop as the avenue for getting Docker Engine which is required. Install Docker for ArcGIS Notebook Server—ArcGIS Notebook Server Installation Guide (10.7) | ArcGIS Enterprise Docker for Desktop states that it is only supported for windows 10. https://hub.docker.com/editions/community/docker-ce-desktop-windows Docker Engine Enterprise states that it supports 2016+. Install Docker Engine - Enterprise on Windows Servers | Docker Documentation So, do we use docker for desktop or docker engine enterprise when deploying Notebook Server onto a 2016/2019 server?
... View more
09-09-2019
06:05 PM
|
0
|
6
|
2175
|
|
POST
|
If you turn on automatic account creation, are accounts automatically created per a ldap user when they hit the portal home page?
... View more
09-02-2019
05:42 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1372
|
|
POST
|
If this was not happening previously then it is likely that the certificate has expired.
... View more
08-29-2019
09:28 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1471
|
|
POST
|
Exactly. When dealing with the various stakeholders you need to make sure everyone understands the differences between multi-machine site, multiple sites with distinct functions, multiple sites in HA under a NLB etc. Some of these design options may give the desired 'HA' benefit that you are wanting without being a 'true HA' design. For example, a multi-machine site provides some clever workflows for upgrading the site, upgrading underlying OS' and dropping or adding VM's without a perceived outage. This, depending on some audiences, may be the primary reason for a HA design and yet I wouldn't call it actual HA. It's all semantics, but I find the tricky part is unpacking that requirement of 'HA' or 'fault-tolerant' or 'no outages' and then pointing that in the direction of an appropriate design.
... View more
08-29-2019
04:30 PM
|
1
|
2
|
1295
|
|
POST
|
You are correct, you can have both web adaptors on the same server but they need to have unique names. The most common web adaptor name tends to be 'arcgis' as per the online help. When two web adaptors are on the same web server then it tends to be 'portal' and 'server' to easily differentiate. You could also use the webadaptor name to highlight the solution name or capability component if that suits your goals, e.g. 'govmap' for public facing local govt maps. That way, when users connect to it, they type a URL which makes sense, e.g. the web adaptor for the image server is called imagery. I would suggest webgis could be improved as webgis tends to be a catch-all term for a web enabled GIS and not just an ArcGIS Server.
... View more
08-27-2019
09:28 PM
|
3
|
0
|
1937
|
|
POST
|
As Moginraj Mohandas said, a multi-machine site is not actually HA. When we talk about failover & HA, we need to talk about it in the context of risk. If you had two distinct AGS sites underneath a NLB, what risk are you trying to mitigate? If the network connectivity drops, failover means nothing. If the data tier drops, failover means nothing. Etc. Active-passive of AGS would only resolve an issue which is inherent to the AGS application tier. And, theoretically, both sites are identical so the issue could also occur in the passive site. I tend to find the argument for HA in the application tier is not strong enough to warrant the administrative overhead when considering how little risk it mitigates. Risk is only comprehensively mitigated when you have a passive site on a completely different domain/data centre with duplicate data holdings etc.
... View more
08-27-2019
07:21 PM
|
1
|
4
|
1295
|
|
POST
|
Just to clarify, this is a design where the hosting server would be active-passive (2 x VM's, 2 x sites)? Or, a hosting server site that is multi-machine (2 x VM's, 1 x site)?
... View more
08-22-2019
06:53 PM
|
0
|
7
|
1295
|
My kudoed posts
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 09-19-2024 04:41 PM | |
| 1 | 05-20-2024 05:43 PM | |
| 4 | 02-28-2024 08:34 PM | |
| 1 | 01-26-2023 01:39 PM | |
| 1 | 10-19-2023 05:51 PM |
Activity Feed
- Got a Kudo for Support SSO in ArcGIS Sites. Monday
- Got a Kudo for Support SSO in ArcGIS Sites. a week ago
- Kudoed Support setting the default Portal URL during a silent install for EdenPunter. 2 weeks ago
- Posted Re: Is 1 click backup SDE to gdb possible? Or at least copy all versions and Archiving tables? on ArcGIS Enterprise Questions. 3 weeks ago
- Posted Re: Publicly shared ArcGIS Dashboard does not Display in ArcGIS Hub Site page when User is Not Logged In on ArcGIS Enterprise Ideas. 4 weeks ago
- Kudoed Rename Portal for ArcGIS windows service--> ArcGIS Portal for Dan_Brumm. 09-26-2024 04:42 PM
- Kudoed Expand Supported Java App Platforms for Web Adaptor for apulverizer. 09-26-2024 04:42 PM
- Posted Re: OpenID Connect group membership on ArcGIS Enterprise Ideas. 09-26-2024 04:39 PM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Is there a maximum number of recommended vertices for a Rest endpoint?. 09-20-2024 11:15 AM
- Kudoed Support OAuth 2.0 standard returning token_type for FranciscoBjörnler. 09-19-2024 05:22 PM
- Posted Re: Customize ArcGIS Portal Map Viewer by adding logo on ArcGIS Enterprise Ideas. 09-19-2024 04:45 PM
- Kudoed Customize ArcGIS Portal Map Viewer by adding logo for Musa_SerkanArslan. 09-19-2024 04:44 PM
- Posted Re: Impact of Disabling SMBv1 protocol on ArcGIS Enterprise (10.8.1) on Windows Server on ArcGIS Enterprise Questions. 09-19-2024 04:43 PM
- Posted Re: Is there a maximum number of recommended vertices for a Rest endpoint? on ArcGIS Enterprise Questions. 09-19-2024 04:41 PM
- Got a Kudo for Support SSO in ArcGIS Sites. 09-10-2024 01:32 AM
- Got a Kudo for Support AD or LDAPS identity stores. 08-30-2024 11:29 AM
- Got a Kudo for Re: New Technical Paper: Considerations for configuring antivirus software for ArcGIS Enterprise hosts. 08-21-2024 07:13 PM
- Got a Kudo for Support AD or LDAPS identity stores. 08-05-2024 12:31 PM
- Got a Kudo for Support AD or LDAPS identity stores. 07-11-2024 06:25 AM
- Got a Kudo for Re: Arcpy Runtime Error The Product License has not been initialized. 05-27-2024 06:22 AM
Contact Me
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
a week ago
|