Latest Contributions by TanuHoque

@notebooker  The main purpose of a Subtype Group layer is not what you have, but you might want it a try to see it that works as a workaround. https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/mapping/layer-properties/subtype-layers.htm     ... View more

@Ming. As@Jianxia noted, chart capability is not currently available via print service. Technically you can do that and requires some customization. please DM or email me, and I can share some code with you ... View more

@TomGeo  I'm afraid I'm not quite sure about your use case and requirements.I'd appreciate if you could kindly explain it a bit more, may be with some screenshots. Are you trying it do it from Pro? Have you looked at this clipping and spatialFilter options in map service export, identify etc. operations? Do you think that might help you? https://developers.arcgis.com/rest/services-reference/enterprise/export-map.htm#ESRI_SECTION1_AB906DF5DE104CA387C82CE6772E2F9C  ... View more

@chill_gis_dude  when you check the 'allow assignment of unique numeric IDs...' in a map's Properties page, all layers and tables get assigned with unique ids automatically. Is it not working for you? I'm afraid it is not very clear from your comment above. Look forward to your feedback. Tanu ... View more

@YMSSK  can you pls share exact reproducible steps and possibly data? I can take a look at this. I understand you shouldn't see anything removed just because you overwrote a service. That said, since we don't use map service for any editing, I was wondering how it is impacting your workflow. I'd appreciate if you could explain it for me. Thanks a lot Tanu ... View more

@MichaelBell  Since you have already figured it out how to do it in Pro - I assume using arcpy, all you need to do is to share that out as a geoprocessing service. And you should be good. ... View more

pls see my reply here: https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-enterprise-portal-questions/print-custom-layout-text-elements-in-web-map/m-p/1172897/highlight/true#M12296 ... View more

@MelanieWadsworth  It sounds like there might be an option for related records by editing the py? Sorry if that is how it came across. I didn't mean to say that.  Currently we don't have any option in py for this. The blog post was written before the related records option was even introduced in ArcGIS Pro reports. The blog was targeting the simple use case i.e. generate reports from selected features (no related records business in there) Edited the workflow/py to source my points layer, and added the related section (like you described above). where does the source point to? to your local dataset or your service? If it is your service, then it should work. If it still doesn't work, please send me some data/steps to help reproduce. Is your service happened to a public one? ... View more

@best  sorry for the delay. this is how the dyn text element should be defined <dyn type="layout" property="metadata" attribute="title" emptyStr=""/> ref: https://enterprise.arcgis.com/en/server/latest/publish-services/windows/tutorial-publish-additional-layouts-for-printing-with-arcgis-pro.htm please let me know if you have any question.     ... View more

@LucasMNDNR, @MelanieWadsworth  Sorry for the delayed response.  The answer is basically yes and no at this point. The example that shared above is not hardcoded meaning you can create a rptx file in Pro and use that with any 'web feature layer' as long as field names match. If you want to see related records in your print service output, you need to go with complete hardcoded option. Here is what you can do: open Pro add your feature layer (off map or feature service) (may be) the related table/layer too create a report add related section  save it as a .rptx file use that with your print service (follow the same instructions provided above) on the python side, you (might) need to comment out code that set/update data reference for the report. If you have any such service public, I can give it a try myself, and might give you updated py file etc. Sorry it is not a solution you were hoping for. We are hoping to have a better solution in near future (fingers crossed).   ... View more