Latest Contributions by LarryYoung

Hi All, I'm told the potential work around for this is to go ahead an enable the Version Management Service, but then after the service is published go to Server Manager > Services > Capabilities > select Version Management and uncheck all Operations allowed. Give that a try.  It is something we want to address in Pro at some time, but the concern is over the potential unexpected ramifications.  larry       ... View more

Hi All, Again, appreciate the comments and feedback.  The mobile worker collecting data in the field and then coming back to the office to clean it up is not a workflow we had considered with Web Editor, so we will take that under consideration.  What i've heard mentioned in that context is simple geometry updates, along with bulk attribute updates.  Those capabilities should be possible with Map Viewer or the Editor widget in Experience Builder in the next release or two.  We are in the process of designing bulk attribute updates now. As for the road map of Web Editor, think in terms of Pro editing capabilities as we will move in that direction with all the editing tools for extend/trim, replace geometry, copy parallel, vertex editing dialog, etc.  Also a lot of work planned around shared edge editing and topology, and more capabilities for parcel management and utility networks.  Additionally we have plans to support creating and saving application configurations with Web Editor to allow the creation of more streamlined applications for specific workflows.  Web Editor will be the premier editing application on the web. thanks, larry ... View more

Hi All, Thanks for the feedback on this topic.  We put a lot of thought into the user type requirement for Web Editor, but are receiving a lot of responses based on the decision.  The basic thinking is we will offer much more with Web Editor than we have before for editing on the web which translates into a higher license requirement. As we consider your feedback, was wondering if you could elaborate on why you are advocating for mobile worker as the minimum user type for Web Editor?  Is the plan to have your users edit in the field with Field Maps and then come back to the office and clean the data up with Web Editor?  The expectation is not to use Web Editor in the field on a phone is it? Thanks, larry   ... View more

Hi All, First off, much time and thought went into whether to augment existing applications or create a new application.  In the end we decided a separate application was best and i'll give you two main reasons: Creating a focused app - by creating an application just for editing it gives us the ability to streamline workflows for that purpose.  If you create a single app to do everything, then you have to genericize some process as a result.  An example would be the toolbars across the top of Web Editor which are context based knowing the user is editing. Configuration - In a future release we will support configuration of  Web Editor to further support streamlining workflows.  For instance, you could configure Web Editor to support only updating attributes and save that as an instance of the application.  If the editing capabilities are rolled into Map Viewer, then the options for configuration are reduced if not eliminated. Hope that helps.  Also worth noting much of the functionality of Web Editor will make its way into web components that will be available in Experience Builder and Map Viewer at the discretion of those teams (i.e., does it make sense for the application and its purpose) and in the context of those applications. ... View more

Please bear with us with Web Editor as this is the initial release.  There is a lot more editing functionality still to come including things such as auto-complete. One of the advantages of Web Editor is that it is a focused application specifically for editing.  As i mentioned in an earlier post, if we start adding additional functionality not specific to editing, then we over complicate things for those just looking to edit.  Not all organizations have the same workflows and personas within their organization, so we believe the simplified editing experience we can create with Web Editor is appropriate on the web as opposed to a single do everything application. Experience Builder is designed to allow organizations to create applications targeting the specific workflows they need to address.  These workflows can include editing, geoprocessing, etc.  The workflows you can target with Experience Builder can be very specific hence the need for a large variety of widgets including editing. We are aware of the need for similar capabilities within the Edit Widget for Experience Builder as what users are accustomed to with WebApp Builder and the Edit, Smart Editor, and Batch Attribute Editor widgets.  Expect those capabilities to be available with the Edit Widget and possibly other widgets for Experience Builder in the next release or two.   ... View more

Thanks for the input.  We've put a lot of thought into capabilities like this.  We realize the number of steps involved in adding a layer and similar processes.  Web Editor is meant to be a focused editing app, though, so the moment we open the door to that type of functionality you have to ask about changing symbology, defining the Feature Form and popup, etc.  Start adding too much and you complicate the editing experience. We will most likely support adding layers in a later release as part of the configuration process, but as with other topics, waiting for more feedback. ... View more

Hi,  It is true the utility network is not yet fully support in offline workflows for editing purposes, but we do plan on having that in place by the end of 2024. That said, there are many different levels to your workflow and i strongly suggest you begin with your Esri partner coordinator or sales manager for a more in depth discussion.   Once you go offline, what do you plan to edit with?  Are you going to try and use FIeld Maps, a custom Maps SDK application, or a partner solution?  Field maps has editing capabilities, of course, but not at the level you are talking about for utility networks.  Some of that will also come in the future, but may not be enough for your requirements. Sync and taking data offline in general can support taking subsets of the data offline, but again you have to wait for full support of the utility network in that capacity.  If you leave out the offline part, we've seen organizations implement restricting work in certain areas through SOE/SOIs and/or attribute rules. One good source for utility network info is here:  https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-utility-network/resources.  Click on the blogs link to find blogs on offline, etc. thanks. ... View more

Hi @JimmyBowden  The check for a UTE license was removed from the trace call on the Utility Network Service with ArcGIS Enterprise 11.2.  Depending on what client you are using, you should now be able to trace without a UTE as long as you move forward to ArcGIS Enterprise 11.2. thanks, larry ... View more

@shildebrand Just as an FYI, you can also create a selection layer from the Subtype Group Layer and then do a join to that. ... View more

Thanks for the feedback.  This is not the first time we've gotten this request.  We are taking a look at this and other licensing changes with the next couple of releases. ... View more

What you describe makes sense, but what it would mean is adding a new feature class to every domain network.  Instead of having the 5 features classes (devices, junctions, assemblies, lines, and subnetlines) for each domain network we would then have 6.  This would be a very significant change for this one use case that would have an impact on every data model across all disciplines. Other things currently being modeled in the structure boundary class (substations, cabinets, bays, etc.) could also be thought of as electric specific items, so would you also move them to an electric polygon assembly class?   ... View more

Hi David, For reasons you state, administrators of the system will be able to lock and deploy the setting through the application management functionality:  https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/application-setting-management.htm#. Hopefully that helps. Larry ... View more

Hi Malcolm, We plan to support the ability to Save or Discard edits in Pro 3.1 when working against non-versioned data.  By default edits will be saved automatically as they are now, but through the options setting the user will have the ability to enable a single workspace edit session.  Through this session users will have the ability to save or discard edits. Larry ... View more

Hi @DavidWheelock2, We've been discussing how to approach this requirement and were not able to get something into the Pro 3.0 release.  We have an approach now that we are aiming to include with the Pro 3.1 release.  Hopefully we can get it done for that release (if not that one, the next), as we understand the importance. Thanks, larry Esri Product Management ... View more

Hi Mike, Do you have an incident number for the issue? Thanks, larry ... View more