|
POST
|
I have a simple survey form with a repeat section. When I set the repeat_count to a previous integer value input on the form ${counter} the select_one dropdowns display strike-out text once a value is selected. If I use a fixed value for the repeat_count or leave it blank and use the Add/Delete functionality of the repeat the dropdows are fine. I also tried setting using string(${counter}) and int(${counter}) for the repeat_count with the same result. The appearance of the select_one filed are set to minimal. Any input? repeat_count set to ${counter} an integer field value, strikeout text displayed in dropdowns: repeat_count set to fixed value of 2, normal text displayed in dropdown: I attached a sample file that demonstrates the issue. I did find a few workarounds; 1) place a non-zero value in for the default on the ${counter}, 2) turn off required on the select_one and 3) use a fixed value or do not set the value for the repeat_count.
... View more
05-21-2018
08:11 AM
|
0
|
2
|
2552
|
|
POST
|
Try using a single selected(${PIPE_AREA}, '2') for the T2_D text box and see if that works. If so, repeat for each individually for each text box. If you need to use multiple conditions it should be selected(${PIPE_AREA}, '1') or selected(${PIPE_AREA}, '2') and selected(${PIPE_AREA}, '3') etc. The "or" can be changed to an "and" depending upon your conditions.
... View more
05-21-2018
04:19 AM
|
0
|
0
|
8785
|
|
POST
|
A few more questions/suggestions: Do you get the same error for linear features that references the appropriate abandon feature class, ie lines for lines? From the MXD you are using to abandon the features to the SDE connection: enter an edit session to the SDE database. select a single linear feature, a water line segment for example. from the edit menu select cut, then select paste in the paste dialog select the water abandoned lines layer as the target and click OK. You may need to zoom into the a level the abandoned features are visible, for it to display in the dialog drop down Did this paste into the abandoned FC? If not, you have a permissions issue with the DB. Try the same for a point feature and the abandon point layer When you are using the abandoned feature tool, try dragging the abandoned line layer and abandoned point layer from your TOC to the appropriate drop down on the tool and drop them. Then try and abandon a single feature. The path name in the error message you provided does not look correct for an SDE connection. I am working on a production system at the moment so I cannot experiment to get a error message for comparison.
... View more
02-28-2018
01:10 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1713
|
|
POST
|
Alex, Does the tools work when you have just a single water main or a single fitting selected to be abandoned?
... View more
02-15-2018
08:40 AM
|
0
|
3
|
1713
|
|
POST
|
Allyson, The most recent version is available at Esri/local-government-desktop-addins
... View more
11-08-2017
04:52 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1713
|
|
POST
|
Paul, Thanks for the updated tools, they appear to be working. I did find one other sudo glitch. When you unabandon Water Hydrant Valves or Water System Valves they do not initially show. The “HYDRFLAG” comes back in as NULL and will not display because of the Definition Query on these two layers. I reset one layer to include “OR HYDRFLAG IS NULL” so it will at least display.
... View more
05-03-2017
02:01 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3633
|
|
POST
|
I received a phone call from ESRI Utilities Team regarding this question. As Howard pointed out above there is not a one size fits all answer, however, the utilities team did have some excellent input. The basis for separating the water data from the LGIM core is for future direction of utility networks. With the proposed release of utility networks in the first quarter of 2018, there will be a need to eventually separate the data as the deployment continues to evolve over the next few years. Our plan is to move our water, sewer and storm data onto a separate geodatabase and into geospatial networks. This is the first major change to our LGDM schema in almost eight years and positions us to migrate to utility networks in the future once the new networks are well established.
... View more
05-03-2017
10:46 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2667
|
|
POST
|
I just ran into this on the newest version (2/2017) as well, on both GBD and SDE enterprise databases. After looking into the issue further found the python scripts AbandonFeatures.py and UnAbandonAssets.py were trying to modify the GlobalID fields which are not editable. If your database is not utilizing Global id's the script works great. To correct this three lines of code need to be modified to exclude modifying the GlobalID values. In AbandonFeatures.py lines 203 and 244 by appending code to exclude GlobalID. 202 for fieldName in fieldListLines:
203 if fldInfo.findFieldByName(fieldName) >= 0 and fieldName != "GlobalID":
204 arcpy.AddMessage("fieldName: " + fieldName)
205 newRow.setValue(fieldName, row.getValue(fieldName))
...
243 for fieldName in fieldListPoints:
244 if fldInfo.findFieldByName(fieldName) >= 0 and fieldName != "GlobalID":
245 newRow.setValue(fieldName, row.getValue(fieldName))
And in line 205 of UnAbandonAssets.py the same. 204 for fieldName in fieldList:
205 if targetFldInfo.findFieldByName(fieldName) >= 0 and fieldName != "GlobalID":
206 newRow.setValue(fieldName, row.getValue(fieldName))
... View more
05-03-2017
09:04 AM
|
0
|
4
|
3633
|
|
POST
|
George, Thanks for the quick reply. The whitepaper "The Road Ahead for Network Management" is a great overview of what is forthcoming in network management. I am looking for information that goes a little deeper. Currently we have a single SDE geodatabase that is roughly based upon a very early schema version of LGIM. We are going to migrate this data over to the newest version of the LGIM as well as create networks for water, storm and sewer systems. Should we continue to maintain this on a single SDE database, break the database into two or more databases such as - LGIM core data and a separate database(s) for networks, etc. Currently we are only utilizing the ArcGIS desktop environment with a single ArcGIS Server running an informational website but are planning on establishing an ArcGIS Portal and expanding into ArcGIS Pro using the numerous readily available resources.
... View more
05-01-2017
08:18 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2667
|
|
POST
|
With the separation of utility networks into separate schemas from the local government model how is it best to deploy this to an enterprise environment? We are a small city with existing GIS data for water, storm and sewer that we are getting ready to move these items to a managed networks for each. With ESRI removing this data from the LGIM and creating separate GDB and schemas, has a deployment guide, best practice or whitepaper been published? Should the utility data be maintained in a separate SDE geodatabase from the core LGIM data?
... View more
05-01-2017
07:32 AM
|
0
|
5
|
3524
|
|
POST
|
Kim, Yes, this use to work in previous versions of X-Ray. I have not been able to get that far with the newest version. There is an older video demonstrating making a modification to the XML via X-Ray the applying the modified schema to a blank GDB (link below). To make changes to an existing GDB, I typically export out only the feature class I want to modify to the XML, make the changes using x-ray/excel then apply the revised schema to an existing database using the "Import Using Geoprocessing..." option under the X-Ray menu. X-Ray is a great tool for working with large or unfamiliar databases. The new version has a few bugs and hopefully ESRI will quickly get a revision out. Video link: Introduction-to-X-Ray-for-ArcCatalog Lance
... View more
01-20-2017
02:15 PM
|
2
|
0
|
3767
|
|
POST
|
Yes, That error is received when I select "Import XML Workspace to Selected GDB" Please note if you open the XML and directly click Import to the geodatabase there is not an issue. However, if you open the XML, Press Save, and then click Import to the GDB you will receive the error. Watching the XML, it changes from 11,592 KB to 7,845 KB when the saved button is clicked.
... View more
01-18-2017
12:14 PM
|
1
|
2
|
3767
|
|
POST
|
- What version of Windows are you using? Windows 7 Professional, SP1 - Is the windows version a 32-bit or 64-bit machine? 64-bit - What version of Microsoft Office is installed? Office Professional 2013 – 15.0.4885.1001 - Did you have any older version of x-ray on your machine? Yes, but they were removed prior to installing the new add-on - Is the XML schema you are starting with Schema Only? Yes, it is the LocalGovernment.xml directly downloaded from ESRI and dated 6/13/2016 Lance
... View more
01-18-2017
07:27 AM
|
0
|
4
|
3767
|
|
POST
|
I just started a new project using X-Ray for Geodatabases in ArcCatalog 10.5. I export an existing GDB to XML using the "Export GDB to XML Workspace" in X-Ray. The XML Workspace saves and can be utilized to create a new GDB. However, if I use the "Save edits to selected XML button" the XML is corrupted. A substantial reduction in the XML file size is noted when saving. I noticed this while trying to change the coordinate system on the schema but is also occurs if you just hit the SAVE button after creating the XML. I am using the 2017.1.10 version of X-Ray on ArcCatalog 10.5. Any possible solutions?
... View more
01-17-2017
01:37 PM
|
1
|
8
|
5558
|
|
POST
|
Use 'Bld%06d' %Bld_ID rather than 'Bld' + str(Bld_ID)
... View more
09-10-2015
11:31 AM
|
3
|
0
|
2905
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 05-14-2026 12:23 PM | |
| 1 | 09-16-2019 05:49 PM | |
| 1 | 06-11-2025 03:32 PM | |
| 1 | 12-26-2023 09:15 AM | |
| 1 | 12-29-2023 10:06 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
05-14-2026
11:20 AM
|