Latest Contributions by MikeMillerGIS

The features association status will not get updated. ... View more

What is the error message in the Dirty Area on error 29.  Does it provide the GUIDs of all controllers in errors?  Our guess is that we are creating an error for everything guid in the that error.  On 3.1, the logic to remove duplicates had some issues. ... View more

Anyway we can get a copy of the dirty area table?  We have made some changes in the 3.3 version of the tools, any chance you can run them? ... View more

Some UN errors represent more than one error and some UN errors are reported more than once.  For instance, No Junction Edge rule.  That is reported by the UN on the Junction and the Edge, so 2 errors.  We only report that once in summarize. The number of errors will be different.  We are reporting on the unique set of errors. ... View more

Are you are asking can you detect this edit in the database?  I do not think you can.  Creating an attachment can change its association status, but if it already has that status, it will not change it.  If you need to detect what features changed status, then the version api has a change component you can use. ... View more

Is this an annotation layer?  Could you send me a schema? [email protected] ... View more

I made a simple version and tried to repo it, but could not.  Do you have any null values in Docname? ... View more

You could try the Update Related AR template found in here - https://github.com/Esri/arcade-expressions/tree/master/attribute-rules/attribute_assistant https://esri.github.io/arcade-expressions/docs/3.3/UpdateRelated.html This will be a core Templated Attribute Rule in 3.5 ... View more

Then I update the subnetwork using the find subnetwork pane or geoprocessing tool successfully.  When I run the export subnetwork too, the tier parameter says that there are no clean subnetworks discovered. Check your Subnetwork Definition.  Do you have Manage Is Dirty set to false?  If so, your subnetwork will always report Dirty and you cannot run Export Subnetwork.  We typically ship the models with this set to False as there is cost managing a system tier and you need to opt into managing Is Dirty When I open the subnetwork table and view field details, the "ISDIRTY" field has a default value of True and the subnetwork records that I want to delete are all attributed with "True" MM: You need to check the Subnetwork Definition.  I am pretty sure manage is dirty is set to false. Does there need to be an asset that serves as a subnetwork controller at the beginning of the pink line to represent the supply (river)?  No, but you could add a intake and set it up as a controller in the system tier.  This subnetwork would be a Raw water subnetwork. Any ideas on what type of feature or asset would represent the supply from a body of water such as a river?  This is not something we have currently in our data model. MM: The upcoming release of the Water Utility Network Foundation, we are adding an Intake Asset Group to Water Device:   If I set the pumps at the plant as subnetwork controllers for a pressure subnetwork, all assets are assigned to the system subnetwork.  Wouldn't you think that everything after the pumps would be the pressure subnetwork? Yes. If you are using a pressure zone tier.  I would evaluate dropping the system tier and using the Pressure Zone tier as the rank 1 tier.  There is cost to managing a system tier if you just have one system.   We have multiple independent systems within the same utility network.  My thought was that each system would have a system subnetwork and then one or more multiple pressure systems.  In the example I referenced, maybe the raw water line from the river would be one pressure system, and a second pressure subnetwork after treatment?  How difficult is it to drop an entire system tier? MM: Then a system subnetwork might make sense.  You could also just create them as a raw water system in the pressure zone.  You would have to drop the system in the Asset Package.  Easiest is to use the D Configuration table.  https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-solutions/latest/tool-reference/utility-network-package/pdf/Utility%20Network%20Package_Asset%20Package%20Reference.pdf How do you handle wells that feed a treatment plant? What about bodies of water that serve as a source for a system? You can set wells and intakes as controllers and create a subnetwork that feeds the plant.  The system tier really should not be one subnetwork If you have one system subnetwork, you are taking a big cost on validate.  As Validate has to trace the system and if everything is one big system, that could be costly.  If you plan on having a pressure zone tier, you can evaluate dropping the system tier and just using pressure zones.   Maybe it makes more sense to split these up into separate system subnetworks for each water system?  On the other hand, I'm not really sure what the purpose is for a system subnetwork.  We really would like to use subnetworks as the basis for isolation, upstream, and downstream tracing.  I'm thinking just having several pressure subnetworks would solve this? MM: If you need to trace across adjacent tiers, then having a system tiers has an advantage.  When in a pressure zone, you can select system as the target tier and trace through multiple pressure zones to the treatment plant.  As of 3.5 and before, you cannot trace up/down across adjacent tiers without selecting a target tier of a lower/higher rank.   ... View more

Then I update the subnetwork using the find subnetwork pane or geoprocessing tool successfully.  When I run the export subnetwork too, the tier parameter says that there are no clean subnetworks discovered. Check your Subnetwork Definition.  Do you have Manage Is Dirty set to false?  If so, your subnetwork will always report Dirty and you cannot run Export Subnetwork.  We typically ship the models with this set to False as there is cost managing a system tier and you need to opt into managing Is Dirty Does there need to be an asset that serves as a subnetwork controller at the beginning of the pink line to represent the supply (river)?  No, but you could add a intake and set it up as a controller in the system tier.  This subnetwork would be a Raw water subnetwork. If I set the pumps at the plant as subnetwork controllers for a pressure subnetwork, all assets are assigned to the system subnetwork.  Wouldn't you think that everything after the pumps would be the pressure subnetwork? Yes. If you are using a pressure zone tier.  I would evaluate dropping the system tier and using the Pressure Zone tier as the rank 1 tier.  There is cost to managing a system tier if you just have one system.   How do you handle wells that feed a treatment plant? What about bodies of water that serve as a source for a system? You can set wells and intakes as controllers and create a subnetwork that feeds the plant.  The system tier really should not be one subnetwork If you have one system subnetwork, you are taking a big cost on validate.  As Validate has to trace the system and if everything is one big system, that could be costly.  If you plan on having a pressure zone tier, you can evaluate dropping the system tier and just using pressure zones.     ... View more

When you published the service, did you render the layers by the Subtype/Asset Group?  If not, you need to.  This sets the Type field, which many clients use for subtype info.   If you did and it is still not working, did you increase the coded value domain code on the service?   https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-solutions/11.4/reference/configure-electric-multiuser-environment.htm#ESRI_STEP_D8F012E215904B5F95FACAE4FECFADE5   ... View more