|
POST
|
It's an interesting thing to see this technology/service require Docker running on Hyper-V. So the software is bound to a #2 Hyper-visor in the world severely limiting its portability? Is there a plan within #ESRI to make this flexible enough to run on ANY Docker compliant/compatible platform?
... View more
08-29-2019
02:09 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1272
|
|
POST
|
No I was asking as a extension of his question; we actually run Full FME Desktop and Server. We still have a license for Data-Interop; but that is used by other folks that don't need the full power and flexibility of FME.
... View more
08-09-2019
02:13 PM
|
0
|
1
|
8742
|
|
POST
|
Bruce Harold why would ESRI decide to disable/limit Data-Interop reading GeoJSON? I know Full FME does this without question; so this was a ESRI choice. I'm just curious of that thought process...
... View more
08-09-2019
02:03 PM
|
0
|
3
|
8742
|
|
POST
|
I would be interested to hear how this has been addressed? As far as I know all I have been told is "pay for it now".
... View more
07-18-2019
09:03 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1453
|
|
POST
|
No this is not a "Correct Answer" and this has not been addressed offline; this is a question to the users about their opinions.
... View more
07-18-2019
08:54 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1453
|
|
POST
|
This had previously been included as a component of the EEAP; but I was just informed this has now been pulled. So this gives on less reason to pay a hefty annual cost to ESRI.
... View more
07-13-2019
06:16 PM
|
0
|
0
|
6335
|
|
POST
|
I am curious how many users were getting/using ArcGIS Monitor as a feature of their EEAP and how you feel having that pulled (and without very clear communication) as a feature of that Annual-Contract. It was a major justification I had to support & maintain the EEAP; and now that is gone.
... View more
07-13-2019
06:13 PM
|
0
|
4
|
1586
|
|
POST
|
I export them as logical blocks; export a given Zipcode, County, State, Watershed etc...
... View more
06-20-2019
11:37 AM
|
1
|
0
|
19310
|
|
IDEA
|
If you are selecting a point based on the map; what are you only doing a centroid of a 1k Poly? The full calculated location should be able to be returned.
... View more
06-04-2019
01:54 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1606
|
|
IDEA
|
Or shift the function of assigning the license to my.esri.com to keep all that kind of administration function together?
... View more
05-31-2019
03:15 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1814
|
|
POST
|
I find wrapping a Try/Catch deeper sometimes will get me more detail when the larger scale task is losing the context. In your case, try wrapping your: with arcpy.da.UpdateCursor(tableName,field) as updateRows: loop; to see if you might have something that is escaping the SQL process.
... View more
05-28-2019
04:34 PM
|
1
|
1
|
2215
|
|
IDEA
|
I would add to this to also automatically send the Error Dump files from Services to ESRI Support. I have written jobs to do that monthly; but that being a core function would be a huge step forward.
... View more
05-23-2019
11:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
915
|
|
POST
|
It depends on your architecture. Is your server running ArcGIS Server? If so you can publish your processes as a GeoProcessing Tool; and the use another tool to schedule and call the Rest-Endpoint to launch the service. We are using a batch-manager called JAMS (from MVPSI) that is very powerful for doing a variety of job management tasks. It is pricey but; it addresses a number of business needs.In other places we have schedules that run from FME Server. There are a number of other tools to do basic job execution (CRON etc) that can meet your needs; you just really need to target which fits you task.
... View more
05-13-2019
01:04 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1332
|
|
POST
|
Pro is fully multi-threaded and 64bit aware; ArcGIS Desktop (ArcCatalog/ArcMap) is 32bit and not multi-threaded aware; but you are able to fake it really well using python/georprocessing tools.
... View more
05-09-2019
10:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5514
|
|
POST
|
Yes, but for me a lot of my jobs & processes we have updated to be multi-threaded or concurrently processing. So the newer machines which are not a huge upgrade from the ones I had bought 5 years about (shift from Dual 8 Cores with hyper-threading) just allows me to spin up more blocks of processing. So a job that would run in 30 hours is running in just under 20; so that is a improvement but with each annual & quarter process I run my data increases by 10%-15%. So in the end its just having good consistent expectations; and the Xeons give that; versus say the I7 or I9 which can do great stuff but aren't designed for workstation class processing.
... View more
05-09-2019
09:39 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1083
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 06-17-2026 09:49 AM | |
| 1 | 12-27-2025 04:14 PM | |
| 1 | 12-20-2025 03:55 PM | |
| 1 | 11-14-2025 01:27 PM | |
| 1 | 03-13-2025 05:24 PM |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
3 hours ago
|