|
POST
|
Bruce Harold why would ESRI decide to disable/limit Data-Interop reading GeoJSON? I know Full FME does this without question; so this was a ESRI choice. I'm just curious of that thought process...
... View more
08-09-2019
02:03 PM
|
0
|
3
|
8542
|
|
POST
|
I would be interested to hear how this has been addressed? As far as I know all I have been told is "pay for it now".
... View more
07-18-2019
09:03 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1414
|
|
POST
|
No this is not a "Correct Answer" and this has not been addressed offline; this is a question to the users about their opinions.
... View more
07-18-2019
08:54 AM
|
0
|
2
|
1414
|
|
POST
|
This had previously been included as a component of the EEAP; but I was just informed this has now been pulled. So this gives on less reason to pay a hefty annual cost to ESRI.
... View more
07-13-2019
06:16 PM
|
0
|
0
|
6281
|
|
POST
|
I am curious how many users were getting/using ArcGIS Monitor as a feature of their EEAP and how you feel having that pulled (and without very clear communication) as a feature of that Annual-Contract. It was a major justification I had to support & maintain the EEAP; and now that is gone.
... View more
07-13-2019
06:13 PM
|
0
|
4
|
1547
|
|
POST
|
I export them as logical blocks; export a given Zipcode, County, State, Watershed etc...
... View more
06-20-2019
11:37 AM
|
1
|
0
|
19078
|
|
IDEA
|
If you are selecting a point based on the map; what are you only doing a centroid of a 1k Poly? The full calculated location should be able to be returned.
... View more
06-04-2019
01:54 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1569
|
|
IDEA
|
Or shift the function of assigning the license to my.esri.com to keep all that kind of administration function together?
... View more
05-31-2019
03:15 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1770
|
|
POST
|
I find wrapping a Try/Catch deeper sometimes will get me more detail when the larger scale task is losing the context. In your case, try wrapping your: with arcpy.da.UpdateCursor(tableName,field) as updateRows: loop; to see if you might have something that is escaping the SQL process.
... View more
05-28-2019
04:34 PM
|
1
|
1
|
2170
|
|
IDEA
|
I would add to this to also automatically send the Error Dump files from Services to ESRI Support. I have written jobs to do that monthly; but that being a core function would be a huge step forward.
... View more
05-23-2019
11:45 AM
|
0
|
0
|
892
|
|
POST
|
It depends on your architecture. Is your server running ArcGIS Server? If so you can publish your processes as a GeoProcessing Tool; and the use another tool to schedule and call the Rest-Endpoint to launch the service. We are using a batch-manager called JAMS (from MVPSI) that is very powerful for doing a variety of job management tasks. It is pricey but; it addresses a number of business needs.In other places we have schedules that run from FME Server. There are a number of other tools to do basic job execution (CRON etc) that can meet your needs; you just really need to target which fits you task.
... View more
05-13-2019
01:04 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1303
|
|
POST
|
Pro is fully multi-threaded and 64bit aware; ArcGIS Desktop (ArcCatalog/ArcMap) is 32bit and not multi-threaded aware; but you are able to fake it really well using python/georprocessing tools.
... View more
05-09-2019
10:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
5380
|
|
POST
|
Yes, but for me a lot of my jobs & processes we have updated to be multi-threaded or concurrently processing. So the newer machines which are not a huge upgrade from the ones I had bought 5 years about (shift from Dual 8 Cores with hyper-threading) just allows me to spin up more blocks of processing. So a job that would run in 30 hours is running in just under 20; so that is a improvement but with each annual & quarter process I run my data increases by 10%-15%. So in the end its just having good consistent expectations; and the Xeons give that; versus say the I7 or I9 which can do great stuff but aren't designed for workstation class processing.
... View more
05-09-2019
09:39 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1057
|
|
POST
|
This is actually the config I have right now; but with Dual-Xeons as a cluster of 3 machines. Very nice platform.
... View more
05-09-2019
09:21 AM
|
0
|
2
|
5380
|
|
POST
|
Working in a Engineering firm; you might be using more than just Arc on the machine; so going with the Xeon would be my recommendation (former Site/Civil Designer in AutoCAD & Microstation). There are plenty of places where the higher cache capacity and higher command-sets are used in software.
... View more
05-08-2019
02:43 PM
|
0
|
0
|
5380
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | a week ago | |
| 1 | 12-27-2025 04:14 PM | |
| 1 | 12-20-2025 03:55 PM | |
| 1 | 11-14-2025 01:27 PM | |
| 1 | 03-13-2025 05:24 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|