|
POST
|
I've experienced similar strangeness. From what I can remember, the workaround (for whatever reason) was to use the Portal root admin account and/or login to the portal from the server or server url i.e. hostname:port\arcgis\home
... View more
05-26-2025
11:35 AM
|
1
|
0
|
881
|
|
POST
|
It's been a while since I've needing to publish any GP tasks but I do remember it being very trial-and-error when it comes to validation. My thinking/wisdom (right or wrong) essentially ended up as: I'm guessing any validation is really limited and static, probably as it's only enacted when the tool is first opened, rather than dynamically after each argument input. If the validation has to actually do/retrieve something from somewhere outside of the validator code - it's not going to work.
... View more
05-23-2025
11:43 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1158
|
|
POST
|
All excellent points from Ryan. I'll just add that if you're using traditional versioning - ensure you're compressing the DB at least weekly. If there's specific layers which are slow, check the spatial indexes also.
... View more
05-22-2025
12:27 PM
|
1
|
0
|
625
|
|
POST
|
What's the data source/location and data type for these features? Any topologies? Can you share any screenshots or more info? There could be licensing issues e.g. some examples could be that a Basic Pro license user couldn't edit SDE database data, or a Geometric Network wouldn't be editable in Pro in any situation.
... View more
05-21-2025
12:51 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1354
|
|
POST
|
I'd open up developer tools in the browser and check the nework traffic for any errors, 404/401 etc. I would ask the colleague to open up the data view of one of the hosted feature layers and see what might be occurring. It's possible that you may have something such as 'editors can only see their own features' applied in the feature layer settings, or from Survey123 if it's survey submitted data. Also you could be using the parent layer farther than _form or _results etc. and it's showing the data for you, but not others.
... View more
05-20-2025
01:00 PM
|
0
|
0
|
868
|
|
POST
|
I think the logic is sound, and the Esri recommended approach. So I think manual post-processing is not necessary - and onoly mfixing the original survey geopoint calculation is required. Solved: Create GeoPoint From Lat & Long Numeric Field Coll... - Esri Community has an example XLS geopoint calculation formatting which may be of use, and I'd recommend sharing your Survey XLS and any screenshots/code you currently have so that someone can assist you.
... View more
05-19-2025
11:44 AM
|
0
|
1
|
941
|
|
POST
|
Yes, I think it is the recommended best and easiest solution in my mind so kudos to Nick. But I'd say the last part is unfortunately factually incorrect. For posterity: Selection layers—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation Caution: The selection layer is only useful as a temporary working dataset, for example, as an input into a geoprocessing model. It lists the FeatureIDs (FIDs) or ObjectIDs (OIDs) of the selected features. These are invalidated when the original data source is updated or changed.
... View more
05-17-2025
12:04 PM
|
1
|
1
|
2832
|
|
POST
|
If practical, I'd try a clean installation. How To: Perform a Clean Uninstall and Reinstall of ArcGIS Pro I'd also recommending sharing a screengrab/info your current version and licensing info from the Pro license page. I'd gather other details such as OS versions, specs, .NET version etc. as this will be helpful if an Esri support case is raised. Screenshots or GIFs of the issue would also be useful to help others understand what may be causing this.
... View more
05-17-2025
11:55 AM
|
1
|
2
|
734
|
|
POST
|
I still think we're stuck with the Geometry functions being limited by "any of these functions must match the spatial reference of the profile's context, which controls the execution of the expression." Geometry functions | ArcGIS Arcade | Esri Developer There is an Idea here - Arcade projectAs Geometry Function I think you'd need to roll your own with something like the Helmert transformation - Wikipedia or GenAI some formula for your coordinate system.
... View more
05-15-2025
12:42 PM
|
0
|
1
|
746
|
|
POST
|
I'd probably just run Closest facility for each Origin and set of Destinations How To: Create Routes from One Location to Multiple Locations or vice Versa in ArcGIS Pro Or you might be able to set I field to only connect Destinations (Incidents) to specific Origins (Facilities). I can't recall if that's the case however. You might also simply be able to do the same with the basic Route Solver.
... View more
05-15-2025
10:47 AM
|
0
|
0
|
751
|
|
POST
|
I've put a simple code example in. NB it's arcpy.GetParameter(0) rather than arcpy.GetParameterAsText(0) Within the code, just treat it as if it were a feature class point layer thereafter.
... View more
05-14-2025
01:34 PM
|
1
|
1
|
931
|
|
POST
|
Can you give an example or sketch etc. of what you want to achieve? I'm not entirely sure of the ask.
... View more
05-14-2025
01:26 PM
|
0
|
2
|
806
|
|
POST
|
A simple example would be the old classic Clip and Ship from ArcGIS tutor which has a Script tool designed for use as a Geoprocessing Task in ArcGIS Server. ArcMap however and based on Model Builder. I think the data etc. can still be downloaded. Geoprocessing service example: Clip And Ship—ArcGIS Server | Documentation for ArcGIS Enterprise However if you would like to share your code so far and what you want to achieve, I'm sure someone could work your example. A simplified example which may be of use. After loading the script as a tool, set the first parameter 0 as Feature Set data type, direction Input and I believe you can control the geometry input type specifying a .lyrx file in the 'default' tab. this link details setting this up Interactive feature input—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation import arcpy
# specify the point layer
feature_set = arcpy.GetParameter(0)
# output buffer
out_loc = arcpy.GetParameterAsText(1)
# buffer
arcpy.analysis.Buffer(feature_set, out_loc, "100 meters")
... View more
05-14-2025
12:58 PM
|
1
|
3
|
938
|
|
POST
|
I think there's been numerous under the hood changes, even to the routing algorithms. Certainly I remember seeing something about the polygon generation being improved. I wouldn't be surprised to see differences in the outputs at all but I'd just check for any hierarchy differences, time-of-day/traffic settings etc. Would be good to get the Esri-take on the differences though.
... View more
05-12-2025
01:20 PM
|
1
|
3
|
801
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 06-13-2025 01:08 PM | |
| 1 | 09-25-2025 03:19 PM | |
| 1 | 09-24-2025 02:35 PM | |
| 1 | 09-17-2025 02:42 PM | |
| 1 | 09-10-2025 02:35 PM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
Wednesday
|