Latest Contributions by DavidPike

I dont quite get what you want to achieve, can you give more detail? Geometry objects can be accessed with a search cursor and SHAPE@  ... View more

ok try this (sentences which start with a # are just comments to you, not part of the code). # insert this where it says 'code block' def func(field): result = (float(field) + 1.0)/ 2.0 return result #put this where it says Med_PS = func(%Row Count%) #if that doesnt work try changing the 'code block' to def func(field): result = (float(field[0]) + 1.0)/ 2.0 return result #if that doesnt work try changing the 'code block' to def func(field): result = (float(field.getOutput(0)) + 1.0)/ 2.0 return result ‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍‍ ... View more

Can you try without the quotations around Row Count ... View more

I guess its password protected? I actually think you can set defaults in the gp widget but I'm not sure. I'd try and get hold of the script, though can you not run it, go to the results window and share as a service? The defaults could be changed in the publishing window maybe. ... View more

I would remove these as parameters in your tool and hardcode the, or set a default value in your arcmap toolbox script properties then republished. ... View more

I think you're replacing the values of tsink and tsource with the field row in the update cursor. ... View more

That doesnt really make sense as the field calculator wont work iteratively in that fashion. To be honest, create your 00001, 00002 in excel when concatenate with 'PVT' and paste the field into your table. ... View more

It seems it's not possible  I was looking at the pro documentation. ... View more

Pass your fields in as a list in the renderer ... View more

Is there an identifiable pattern to break/group the string by? If not I cant really see a solution. ... View more

Why are tsource and tsink on the left of the equals on the update cursor? ... View more

How many entries are there to match to? If you list them I'll put them in the code to match. If theres hundreds I'll think of a better solution ... View more

Hi, The dissolve will only dissolve adjacent features so condition 2 will be met anyway. Regards gaps I would look at the integrate tool but be warned this will alter the existing data. I highly recommend making a copy before u do anything with it. It will also probably destroy and topology u have set up. If u mean a partial field match I would probably add a new field such as higher level soil unit etc. And run a field calculator with a python code block to get the matches. I can write this when I get some time ... View more

Good luck with your project! ... View more