Latest Contributions by RyanUthoff

I have gotten mixed answers on that one. It might depend on how many layers you have in your feature service. If you have a small number of layers, I would say leaving them in one feature service is fine. If you have a large number of layers, it's possible separating them out might be beneficial. You might need to do some testing to see where you get best performance. If you have any data that doesn't change often at all, I would recommend those layers being cached. ... View more

When overwriting, it does not create a new feature service. The item stays the same in Portal and the web maps that contains the feature services will still continue to work. However, a word of warning when overwriting feature services. In the data frame properties, I recommend checking the box next to: "Allow assignment of unique numeric IDs for sharing web layers." This comes in handy when you want to add new layers to the feature service in Pro, and then overwrite the feature service. If you do not have this checked, your item ID's can potentially change and it will mess up the web maps that contains the feature services, and you will have to remove and re-add the feature service within the web map. You can avoid this by checking the box. With that being said, if you have already published a feature service without that box checked, then check it and re-publish, your layer ID's might change and might affect the web map.  This link has more documentation regarding sharing web layers: Introduction to sharing web layers—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS Desktop  ... View more

In order to upload hosted content to Portal, you need the ArcGIS Data Store installed. Have you installed the ArcGIS Data Store? ... View more

With Portal (and ArcGIS Data Store), there can only be a primary and standby machine. The primary Portal machine replicates to the standby Portal machine. When the primary machine fails, the standby machine is promoted to primary. Server on the other hand supports active/active. This link will explain configuring a highly available ArcGIS Enterprise deployment. Configure highly available ArcGIS Enterprise—Portal for ArcGIS (10.6) | ArcGIS Enterprise  ... View more

If you are using Insights 2.3, then you shouldn't need to upgrade to 10.6 from 10.5.1 according to the compatibility table. However, do not upgrade to 10.6.1 as Insights does not support 10.6.1 yet (according to other forum threads). Insights 3.0 should support 10.6.1 (according to other forum threads). Compatibility with ArcGIS Enterprise—Insights reference | ArcGIS  ... View more

I contacted ESRI support and I was told that is was because of lack of resources (RAM) on the server that contains the EGDB. We added more RAM, but it did not resolve the issue. I did not contact ESRI after adding additional RAM. The only way we were able to resolve it is move the EGDB to a different server. It's possible that we still don't have enough resources or it could be a configuration issue with the server. Regardless, moving the EGDB to a different server solved the issue. ... View more

I've had an issue similar to this, except the URL would change to the machine name only under certain circumstances. The solution we found was to modify the web context URL as shown here. Configure your portal to use a reverse proxy server—Portal for ArcGIS (10.6) | ArcGIS Enterprise  ... View more

Thank you! I assumed that was the case but I just wanted to make sure. Thanks! ... View more

For a non-hosted feature layer in ArcGIS Enterprise, I met all of the criteria mentioned in this post, but it still wouldn't let me publish the survey. The only way I was able to publish the survey was after enabling archiving in the feature dataset the feature class is stored in. ... View more

Hello, No, I do not have any updates or have heard of any solutions to this. ... View more

Hello Derek, Thank you for your response. Nothing should have changed. I just ran the installation media to upgrade ArcGIS Enterprise like I have done for previous upgrades without changing any of the settings. I've never set any of the CORS settings within Server or Portal before, so I'm not sure what the settings were before the upgrade. The one time I saw this message before (and it was after the upgrade), I solved it in the browser. Anyway, thank you for your help!  ... View more

Hello Derek, When looking at the internet traffic, I get this message:  "No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource." I have dealt with this message before. I know there is an option in Internet Explorer where I can enable access to data sources across domains, so this is something I can enable in IE (not sure how to do it in Chrome or Firefox right off, but I'll look into that). Is there a reason why all of a sudden this is happening after a server upgrade from 10.5.1 to 10.6? Even using an already created web app at 10.5.1, then using it now through the WAB developer edition, it no longer works (only when trying to edit app, the app itself works fine in view mode). Is there a setting within the server itself I can change to prevent this from happening, or is it only at the browser level? Thank you! ... View more