|
POST
|
I suspect this is a projection issue. So when you first load your vector layers, the map is is setting the map projection based on these layers. Then you go ahead and downlaod the tile package in Web Mercator. But when you create your MMPK, the projection of your tile package is different to that of your vector layers. You should always ensure the map projection is the same as your tile package. Best is to add your vector data, download your tile package, then change your projection to WGS 1984 Web Mercator (right-click on map name, then Properties, then Coordinate Systems), then package up your MMPK.
... View more
04-05-2021
01:12 PM
|
3
|
0
|
2138
|
|
POST
|
If you want the original DEM values between 1000 and 1255, why do you want to add 1000? I will share with you the workflow I would follow to achieve this (but without adding the 1000). I like using Raster Functions as I can test the settings and I don't have to save the final output to disk. From Imagery tab, open up Raster Functions and search for Calculator. Add you DEM as the Raster Variable and assign a character to it (like x in my below image). Under Expression, Type in Con and hit enter to enter your conditional statement. Then you can type Con((x>=1000)&(x<=1255) , x , 0 ). I was not sure whether your highest pint is 1255 or you only wanted to display that range. Then under the General tab, change the Output Pixel Type to values to 16 Bit Unsigned, then hit the Create new layer at bottom of pane. As Jayanta pointed out, your DEM is unlikely to be a 8 Bit Unsigned type as the values are greater than 255. I also noted from your image that it has 3 bands. Are you displaying the properties for the DEM you want to work with? Similarly, the output of the Raster Function cant be a 8 But but rather a 16 Bit type to show values greater than 255. If you want to add 1000 to teh DEM values then you modify the Con statement to something like: Con((x>=1000)&(x<=1255) , x+1000 , 0 )
... View more
03-28-2021
03:57 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3176
|
|
POST
|
One option would be to create a new raster with the required/desired range of min and max values using the Create random raster GP tool. But use the GP tool listed under Data Management toolset and not Spatial Analyst tool as the former lets you specify minimum and maximum values. Then symbolize it and save as lyrx file. Then from your thermal infrared raster images, import the symbology from your new lyrx file you just created. It should give you your desired symbology.
... View more
03-26-2021
12:11 PM
|
1
|
0
|
5477
|
|
POST
|
The .shp.xml file is found with all shapefiles that Ersi software works with. See image. Unfortunately I do not know where the equivalent is stored in a geodatabase. Hopefully someone from Esri can advise. I was hoping one may be able remove the default symbology from Catalog but that does not appear to be the case.
... View more
03-15-2021
10:41 AM
|
0
|
0
|
2032
|
|
POST
|
HI Joe Esri seem to have made some serious changes to its symbology in version 2.7. I have witnessed what you describe several times now and Pro seems to embed the last used symbology as the default symbology with each feature class or shapefile. So when you add a layer to a new project, the last use symbology is automatically applied by default. I noticed that the .shp.xml file now includes this default symbology, and if you delete it, then the shapefile will load without the last used symbology. I usually find the new behaviour to be favovourible in most instances yet there has been the odd occasion where it was undesirable. It would be nice if this was one of the Options that a user can choose to activate or not. Best wishes Mervyn
... View more
03-15-2021
09:16 AM
|
2
|
0
|
2035
|
|
POST
|
I don't think I made myself clear, sorry about that. You can still add your TPK files to your SD card (and I have a 1.3 GB tpk available to me as a basemap on my SD card), you just need to access the correct folder with a little more effort. So browse to the following folder on your SD card, and then copy your basemap into this folder. "SD Card\Android\data\com.esri.fieldmaps\files\basemaps". The unfortunate part of this workflow is that each app (i.e. ArcGIS Collector, ArcGIS Field Map, etc), will require their own basemaps and the apps can't share a common basemap.
... View more
03-10-2021
03:14 AM
|
1
|
0
|
5259
|
|
POST
|
Dear Sveinung I can only reply to the question about basemaps as I have done in Field Maps. The latest releases of Android make it more difficult for Esri to utilise folders outside of those created when the app is installed so you now need to place your basemaps in "Galaxy A70\Card\Android\data\com.esri.fieldmaps\files\basemaps" (in may case but it should not be different to yours). Regards Mervyn
... View more
03-10-2021
01:46 AM
|
0
|
2
|
5265
|
|
POST
|
The easiest approach may be to first open up the CSV in Excel and then combine the two fields into one field using a formula such as "=TEXT(C2,"yyyy/m/dd ")&TEXT(D2,"hh:mm:ss")". But then once you add the CSV file to Pro, your new field will be recognised as a text field and not a date field, so then you need to run the Convert Time Field GP tool to convert it to a date field.
... View more
03-02-2021
11:50 AM
|
0
|
0
|
3900
|
|
POST
|
I reported this as a bug during the Beta testing and it relates to new symbology and transparency used in Pro 2.7. But the problem is bigger than Pro alone as it requires fixing in AGOL too. The solution is to turn off all layer transparency before publishing to AGOL (worked for me). Best of luck.
... View more
02-23-2021
06:03 AM
|
7
|
2
|
1763
|
|
POST
|
Hmm, I am using Pro 2.7.1. I will test this behaviour on a different project. Thanks for checking.
... View more
02-09-2021
09:57 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2034
|
|
POST
|
Just to add that I noticed last week that Layer Masking also resets (unfortunately) when changing the definition query of a layer that is being used as the mask.
... View more
02-08-2021
10:33 PM
|
0
|
3
|
2064
|
|
POST
|
Hi there I am not a specialist in this field but will attempt to answer some of it, but hopefully someone from Esri can jump in and correct me. So, firstly, I am surprised that the Topographic basemap that you downloaded gets blurred as it should be a Vector Tile package where the lines should still remain crisp at most scales. Can you confirm that it is a vector tile package? Under your contents, right-click on the World Topographic Map that you downloaded and go to Properties, then Metadata and confirm that Vector Tile Package is listed under Tags? Historically enabling Vector Tile Basemaps was done at the administrator level for your organisation, hence we need to check. I suspect that to create a mmpk of the entire New Zealand you will probably have to go with a Vector Tile Package in your mmpk. The file sizes are just so much smaller than in standard Tile packages. I had a quick look at the NZ LIZ topographic map and it is a geotiff served off an Image Server. To download this at reasonable resolution for NZ will just be too much for any mmpk I suspect. You may need to break the country up into regions and then create an MMPK for each region. But it is always best practice to focus on a smaller sample area to test the methodology (resolution and file sizes in this case) to assess whether your approach may be feasible. So choose a smaller area and then play around with downloading the LNZ topographic map at a resolution that may be acceptable, then try and go larger to see if that can work. However you may find that one of the other Esri Vector Tile basemap options may work for you (take a look at the Navigation basemap, the OpenStreetMap may also be a good option) Good luck
... View more
02-04-2021
01:43 AM
|
1
|
0
|
938
|
|
POST
|
It sounds like the resolution of your image is too coarse. I am not sure which layer disappears? NZ LINZ ... or World Topographic, but the cause is the same. When you downloaded the World Topographic map, you had to select a maximum scale for the vector layers. If you select a more coarse scale (larger) value, then when you zoom in beyond that scale, then the map will disappear in Pro. Basically the data is too coarse to be visualised properly. So when this happens, you need to try and download a finer scale version of the layer. The good news is that if you put this MMPK onto a mobile device, and view it in either ArcGIS Field maps for ArcGIS Explorer, the layers should still be visible regardless of how far you zoom in, it may just not be very clear!
... View more
01-23-2021
11:50 PM
|
1
|
0
|
6057
|
|
POST
|
You need to remove the basemap. I can see you still have it included in your map even though it is not visible.
... View more
01-23-2021
10:01 AM
|
1
|
2
|
6070
|
|
POST
|
By default, an online basemap is provided with each map you create. This is an online map and if you dont convert it to a tile package, then you can include it in your MMPK as a live layer, but for that you require the publisher extension. But I am guessing you would like to include it as an offline layer in your MMPK. This is super easy to do. So with your live Esri basemap in your map and visible (World Topographic Map in your example), from the Map tab and the Offline group, click on the drop-down menu next to Download Map and tick the "Include basemap & tile layers" checkbox. You also need to select an appropriate scale for your basemap. Then download the basemap and it will automatically be added to your map. Make sure to remove the online basemap and then also ensure that your map projection is the same as your offline basemap (in this case it will be Web Mercator). You should then be able to create your MMPK with the offline basemap and all your other data that was included in the map.
... View more
01-23-2021
03:10 AM
|
1
|
0
|
6093
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 07-24-2025 08:34 AM | |
| 1 | 04-19-2025 07:12 AM | |
| 1 | 02-12-2024 12:38 AM | |
| 1 | 07-02-2024 10:30 PM | |
| 1 | 10-23-2016 11:56 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
a week ago
|