|
POST
|
@BGEGIS I only see three of the possibilities listed above, what about the fourth option of leaving both boxes unchecked? What I'm suggesting is that you run it with the Report Only box unchecked (so it will actually prune) AND the Only Prune System Tables box unchecked (so it will prune the data in the user tables).
... View more
10-14-2025
09:24 AM
|
0
|
0
|
733
|
|
POST
|
Instead of using the asset group field to create the definition queries for your mappings, use the asset type field. You will find it much easier to do your mappings this way.
... View more
10-13-2025
11:38 AM
|
0
|
0
|
468
|
|
POST
|
In the simple data mapping spreadsheet, you need to create separate mappings for each of the asset groups and asset types in your model. This will allow you to properly identify (through a definition query) each asset type in your source model and map it to its corresponding asset type in the target model.
... View more
10-11-2025
02:56 PM
|
0
|
2
|
497
|
|
POST
|
Can you post the command you're using to prune? I notice in the initial post it looks like when you're pruning you had the option to only prune system tables checked. If you run the tool with the "Report Only" option and "Only Prune System Tables" options unchecked, it should prune all user and system tables.
... View more
10-10-2025
02:49 PM
|
0
|
2
|
788
|
|
POST
|
Your views don't appear to be filtering out rows from default, which could be causing some of the problems that you're seeing. The rows in non-default branches may have newer gdb_from_dates that the rows in the default version. In terms of verifying that everything is really being pruned, it's hard to do that without looking at the contents of your system tables and comparing them to the table(s) in question. You may need to open a support case on this one.
... View more
10-10-2025
01:37 PM
|
0
|
4
|
790
|
|
POST
|
if you force the features to be validated, does this clear the errors? if not, please log a case with support to see what is happening.
... View more
10-10-2025
12:41 PM
|
0
|
0
|
466
|
|
POST
|
When possible, doing your initial development/testing in a local mobile geodatabase can speed up the process greatly. Another trick is to write as much of the code as possible using a popup expression (since it shares many of the same profiles/functions as attribute rules), this saves you having to bounce services, gives you access to console, and lets you test it out on different features.
... View more
10-10-2025
12:37 PM
|
2
|
0
|
347
|
|
POST
|
@Joshua_Moreno that tool is designed to merge two asset packages with the exact same schema into a single asset package.
... View more
10-09-2025
06:40 AM
|
0
|
0
|
540
|
|
POST
|
@Aika_gis this latest comment confuses me. Can you include screenshots of the features and errors? If you force the features to be validated (using the full extent) does this resolve the issue?
... View more
10-09-2025
06:38 AM
|
0
|
2
|
479
|
|
POST
|
The Migration Toolset released in 3.5 can identify these situations (using Analyze Network Data) and resolve them (using Apply Error Resolutions). It is also capable of identifying and resolving a variety of other common topological issues.
... View more
10-09-2025
06:32 AM
|
0
|
0
|
367
|
|
POST
|
Oops! Too many links! The tools in question are the Create and Apply Network Copy workbook from the Utility Data Management Support toolbox. This is the link to the article that describes them. I'll also update the link in the original post for posterity.
... View more
10-07-2025
06:51 PM
|
1
|
2
|
562
|
|
POST
|
I just downloaded the sample data from the lesson and verified that the included map does include the bookmark from the tutorial: The location pictured in the lesson is in the northwest corner of the service territory at 1,028,097.13E 1,867,343.62N ftUS
... View more
10-07-2025
09:15 AM
|
0
|
0
|
441
|
|
POST
|
Are there any other errors or unvalidated edits on the feature?
... View more
10-07-2025
09:10 AM
|
0
|
4
|
516
|
|
POST
|
I'm a little confused at what you're asking for. Are you having issues finding the bookmark called "Definition Query" or are you looking for help with finding the properties page that allows you to configure definition queries for a layer? You can access configure the definition queries using the following steps: Select the subtype group layer in the table of contents. Right-click the subtype group layer Select Properties Select the Definition Query page in the dialog
... View more
10-07-2025
04:23 AM
|
0
|
1
|
472
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago | |
| 1 | 09-22-2025 06:57 AM | |
| 1 | 3 weeks ago |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
3 hours ago
|