|
POST
|
Brian Rizzo Joshua's question about what format you're exporting to is important. IMHO, the most important question hasn't been asked: is this a 1:1 or 1:M join? If 1:1, blows my theory. But if 1:M, since you're joining to a file gdb feature class, you will still only see the 900,000 records in the attribute table, but depending on the number of tabular records that are joined with each feature, you could be generating a table that is millions (perhaps many many millions) of records. These ARE stored in the file gdb even though you can't see them. If you export to a shapefile, each record would actually show up as an output feature (but depending on the number of records, you might exceed the limitation of shapefile storage and crash or freeze). Anyway, let us know about the cardinality of the join and even send some data if you want to dig further. About joining and relating tables—Help | ArcGIS Desktop describes what I'm talking about "However, it is possible to create a join under these circumstances. When you create a join in such a case, there are differences between how tools and other layer-specific settings work depending on the data source. If you are using geodatabase data to create the join, all matching records are returned. If you are using nondatabase data, like shapefiles or dBASE tables, to create the join, only the first matching record is returned. This means that if you have created a 1:M or M:M join with geodatabase data and you generate a report, you see multiple records in the report, one for each corresponding match. The multiple matches are also seen when using a join field while symbolizing a joined layer, labeling, identifying features, generating a graph, and using either the Find or Hyperlink tool. If you are using the joined layer as input to a geoprocessing tool or in an export operation, the multiple matching records are used. Caution: In all cases of 1:M joins, only the first matching record is joined and displayed in the layer's attribute table." Maybe this helps?
... View more
04-07-2017
07:13 AM
|
0
|
4
|
4482
|
|
POST
|
Ivano, can you elaborate on how you noticed that the Stack Profile tool isn't accounting for the transformation? Do you have the transformation set in the tool's environment setting? Geographic Transformations (Environment setting)—Geoprocessing | ArcGIS Desktop If we need to dig deeper, are you able to send data and steps that demonstrate the issue? Thanks
... View more
04-03-2017
01:56 PM
|
0
|
1
|
1092
|
|
IDEA
|
Alexander Gray Just to clarify, you're asking for the ability to create a group layer animation in Pro, correct? Making a group layer animation—Help | ArcGIS Desktop
... View more
04-03-2017
09:02 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1345
|
|
IDEA
|
Ted, what do the extents look like for the items where the preview displays the features? I have two examples here. The first is a feature layer with a specific extent for the service: And the example from a solutions template where the service's extent does cover the entire world, and the service layers are empty, acting as templates for users to enter data: Are you working with a service that has a number of sublayers, with each sublayer having a different extent? What happens if you double-click the service to reveal each layer? Clicking on each layer should preview it. Let me know if that works, and/or if the usability in terms of clicks and accessing the service's layers could be better.
... View more
04-03-2017
08:05 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1465
|
|
IDEA
|
Robert is correct that the distances are populated manually. Do you mean that you would like the ability to use multiple input fields to define the distances that will be used to create the multi-ring buffers? If so, please clarify the Idea's title and description to more clearly explain the desired functionality, and it is also always useful to include details about why this functionality is important - what is an example of how you would use this with your data? I can assume that you have multiple fields representing different distances for which buffers need to be generated. But we shouldn't have to guess at the use case. See https://community.esri.com/docs/DOC-8266?sr=search&searchId=886fe7ce-1ca0-4745-bcaf-e54372e95d87&searchIndex=0 Thank you!
... View more
03-30-2017
12:57 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1720
|
|
IDEA
|
LBFlevoland Is your idea the same as https://community.esri.com/ideas/3589 ? If so, we can mark this as a Duplicate and direct votes to that Idea.
... View more
03-30-2017
12:08 PM
|
0
|
0
|
3202
|
|
BLOG
|
Thanks for the question, Randy. Since you're referring to that Idea (https://community.esri.com/ideas/12671) I'm assuming that you've already up-voted that. I checked and didn't see your User Story in the comments section. Many customers have added their stories to the Comments on that Idea, and that is very important for the product team when monitoring the Idea. I know that there are many eyes on this discussion, so please do add your input so that it can be considered with what is there already. Thank you.
... View more
03-30-2017
06:49 AM
|
2
|
0
|
23862
|
|
IDEA
|
For the part about the pick list of queries to choose from, you may want to join the discussion at https://community.esri.com/ideas/2358. It could be an interesting design consideration.
... View more
03-28-2017
02:35 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2748
|
|
POST
|
Please go to https://community.esri.com/ideas/13295 and up vote that Idea if this functionality is important to you!
... View more
03-27-2017
12:00 PM
|
1
|
0
|
6249
|
|
IDEA
|
So you're looking for something similar to ArcReader for ArcGIS Pro, correct? But you also want to have the ability for users to make simple edits in that application? What kind of edits - attribute only, or attribute and geometry? From this most-recent comment, it sounds like you have already explored the editing capabilities of services directly in ArcGIS Online, correct? What is the limiting factor there - what specifically is lacking from ArcGIS Online editing capabilities that would need to be added to meet your requirements?
... View more
03-27-2017
08:13 AM
|
0
|
1
|
2188
|
|
POST
|
Or edit your feature services in ArcGIS Pro which can be done with a Basic license as well! Add a feature service for editing—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS Desktop
... View more
03-24-2017
09:23 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1517
|
|
IDEA
|
Have you tried editing feature services in ArcGIS Pro? Add a feature service for editing—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS Desktop Note that web feature layers (feature services) support editing: Web feature layer—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS Desktop You can also add an entire web map to Pro like you mention above: Add maps and scenes to a project—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS Desktop Please let us know if this addresses the need for a desktop app to edit feature services. If not, provide specific details about why editing feature services in Pro isn't the solution, and why a different solution would be needed.
... View more
03-23-2017
01:30 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2188
|
|
IDEA
|
rborchert What is the data type of the field? I just tried with a text field (loading a 256 character string into a field with 255 length) and I get the following: It gives me the row, but also indicates that the bad value is in the Name field. Granted, I am testing in 10.5 and I realize this was logged last year, but could you test your workflow in 10.5 and let me know what you're seeing? Thanks!
... View more
03-21-2017
02:29 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1340
|
|
IDEA
|
rborchert What is the data type of the field? I just tried with a text field (loading a 256 character string into a field with 255 length) and I get the following: It gives me the row, but also indicates that the bad value is in the Name field. Granted, I am testing in 10.5 and I realize this was logged last year, but could you test your workflow in 10.5 and let me know what you're seeing? Thanks!
... View more
03-21-2017
02:29 PM
|
1
|
1
|
1022
|
|
IDEA
|
Never mind, Rob. I found the case and the enhancement for better documentation about backward compatibility of mosaic datasets created in newer versions to older versions. So, the documentation is one thing, and that definitely would be helpful, but your Idea here stands to actually make Mosaic Datasets backward compatible. Thanks for the clarification.
... View more
03-21-2017
11:34 AM
|
1
|
1
|
4161
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 08-25-2023 08:42 AM | |
| 2 | Tuesday | |
| 9 | 05-15-2026 03:23 PM | |
| 1 | 04-30-2026 03:55 PM | |
| 1 | 04-09-2026 11:52 AM |
| Online Status |
Online
|
| Date Last Visited |
yesterday
|