Latest Contributions by JeremyWright

@WillyLynch2 maybe I'm having trouble understanding the use case.  You need a layer placed at a static elevation (e.g. 30000 feet).  This can be achieved by using absolute height mode with an expression set to 0 and a cartographic offset, OR by setting the expression to the static height you want to achieve.   ... View more

@WillyLynch2 this is "Cartographic Offset" on the elevation layer properties page. It works in conjunction with all the other elevation modes. So to be equivalent with above you'd set it to "Absolute Height" and "a field" set to <Expression> (defaults to 0), and set "Cartographic Offset" to whatever you want the offset from 0 to be. Help here: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/mapping/layer-properties/define-height-characteristics-for-layers.htm ... View more

The AI format has been closed/proprietary for many years.  What Desktop exports is a very old version of the AI format, and it has limitations even when it is "imported" into modern Illustrator. The AIX + Maps for Adobe workflow is the vendor-supported way for us to bring content from ArcGIS Pro into Adobe Illustrator, and my team and the Maps For Adobe team both spend a lot of time working on it at each release of Pro. @Alex_Blenkush @wayfaringrob  If you are having UX or functionality challenges with AIX or the Maps For Adobe extension, please be sure to report them as bugs and include your repro cases/data at https://support.esri.com/en/report-bug so that the core Pro development team and the Maps for Adobe team can fix them in a future release.   ... View more

Hi all, I have good news on this front! We addressed the issue with items outside of the data frame being included in the export (though hidden by a clipping mask) in upcoming ArcGIS Pro 3.0, and have some small enhancements to this already in the plan for the next release. We will take a look at the other reported issues and attempt to address them in a future release. I have a small request: In the future, these types of issues would be best reported as a BUG directly to Esri support at https://support.esri.com/en/report-bug.   Even if it is a duplicate report, receiving the report increments the counter on the issue so we know firsthand how many users are impacted or impeded by a given issue.  This helps greatly with prioritization of work as we plan each release. ... View more

@JLezik FYI I have logged a BUG issue and the layout team has assigned it to a developer for investigation in a future release.   ... View more

FYI we found the root cause and were able to resolve it for the next release (3.0).  I will link your reported bug to the development issue when it comes in so that it can be properly processed as resolved. ... View more

I've tried quite few variables here and still can't repro the problem.  Would it be possible for you to send your repro case (for example a ppkx that contains a layout illustrating the probem) to https://support.esri.com/en/report-bug so we can start an investigation? ... View more

I assume from the picture that this is Integrated Mesh data?  Can you provide the details and report it as a bug to https://support.esri.com/en/report-bug so it has a paper trail for teams to investigate. ... View more

I haven't been able to repro on layout either.  What version of arcGIS Pro are you using? ... View more

ah ok that was the missing piece - I'll try on layout then.  I was exporting from Map view ... View more

can't repro in 2.9.3 either.  need more info... ... View more

Testing in the upcoming 3.0 beta and I don't see the problem.  I'll give it a try in 2.9.x too ... View more

ok - I'll give it a whirl now.    so to be clear you see the anomalous behavior/appearance ONLY in exports, or also in the view when color management is enabled? ... View more

Sorry for the confusion @PavelSeemann M4ACC is shorthand we use internally for Maps for Adobe Creative Cloud extension - I should have expanded the acronym. ... View more