Latest Contributions by JeremyWright

Brian, Can you please clarify what lighting options you wish to see in addition to what is already implemented?  This will help us respond to your request. The Graphics engine in Pro scenes does already support realistic lighting, for items which support these properties natively (glTF Markers, 3d Object Feature Layers).  The 3d styles (transportation, etc.) in Pro styles that ship with the product do have PBR (physically based rendering) properties for several releases now. We do also apply static PBR properties to 3d objects which do not have them natively, to enhance users ability to discern their shapes. In the scene, you can enable atmospheric simulation as well as lighting based on time/date, shadows can be enabled, etc.  By default ambient occlusion is on, but it can be toggled off if desired. The ground surface itself supports both ambient occlusion and shading based on lighting.  It is off by default. For point cloud and LASD you can enable an enhanced lighting option called Eye Dome Lighting, which enables users to better see the shape of their dense point cloud data. Regards, Jeremy W. ... View more

the help specs it as "Crown Width" so no it is not radius height is above ground level   as you can see from the latest doc we have deprecated these layers in 3.0 and later releases. switching to a standard feature layer will give you more control over the tree representations and parameters as well as their attribute-driven properties, and you can still use the nice tree models included with ArcGIS Pro styles. ... View more

@DianeBaker in your usage of 1-bit, are you using threshold or monochrome mask? ... View more

I just DM'd you my email so you can ping me and I can create an ad-hoc FTP transfer account so you can send your Project Package. ... View more

Worth a shot! I will ping our feature service team lead just to see if he has any other ideas, but I think it would be best if someone from Esri Support were able to troubleshoot more interactively at this point and also attempt to reproduce in house, so our devs can debug what is going wrong.   Last thing to possibly try might be to export features from the feature service to a local file Geodatabase (right-click on the non-drawing layer, choose Data->Export Features).    ... View more

Since the layer shows up in the TOC and works ok when added to a new map I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess it might be related to the SR.  What is the spatial reference of the map projects in which this feature service is not displaying? ... View more

what version of ArcGIS Enterprise is your organizational Map Server?   ... View more

@SujanDS please package your project and send it to support with a description of the bug so we can resolve it in a future release. ... View more

@MollyMoore Just a hunch, but can you try deleting your visualization cache (project->options, go to display tab, click the button to Clear Cache Now, hit OK and see if that fixes the issue with feature services not drawing? ... View more

Unfortunately this was a known issue related to PDF encoding at 3.0 final.  You will need to apply the latest service pack for ArcGIS Pro (3.0.1) to resolve this limitation - you can get it from the updater in ArcGIS Pro or from my.esri.com  ... View more

Alan, We did not see this in our extensive testing of this fix (this testing involved 3 teams) - can you send us the lyr files (as well as let us know which fonts your labels are using)?  If you email me at jeremy_wright@esri.com I can send you an ad-hoc FTP server to transfer these assets to. Regards, Jeremy W. ... View more

@BenC5 thanks for your inquiry.  At Andrew's behest we (the ArcGIS Pro graphics engine team) have investigated your repro case and after a reread of your question above this behavior and appearance are working as you have specified in the layer properties. Why? If you request that a polygon be placed "on the ground" then each of its vertices will be on the ground (whatever that elevation is) and the polygon itself will be triangulated to allow for this.  This will necessarily result in a non-flat polygon for most cases with any elevation variation at all.  You can use the coordinate readout in ArcGIS Pro to see the elevation at each vertex of your polygon. If the same polygon is extruded using modes other than "absolute", then the top of the extruded volume will also be non-flat.  You will see small thin triangles to account for the changes in elevation between vertices just as you would if the polygon were not extruded. If you want to follow best practices for creating water polygon features, your best bet would be to use the 3D Basemap Solution tools as demonstrated here:  https://www.linkedin.com/posts/gertvanmaren_arcgis-esri-digitaltwin-activity-6960112829840375808-jYf8?utm_source=linkedin_share&utm_medium=member_desktop_web Give that a look, and please let me know if you have any further questions on this topic.   ... View more

Folks, Our developers took a look at this one before the Esri UC and determined the root cause.  We have a fix which is slated to be included in the first Pro 3.0 patch.  The public-facing BUG number for this issue is  BUG-000150564 apologies for the unexpected impediment - we've added this scenario and some like scenarios to our end-of-release test plan as well. This fix is slated to be included in 3.0.1 and any subsequent releases of ArcGIS Pro. ... View more

@WillyLynch2 I see what you're saying.  For raster layers there is no "absolute" option.   I tried a 3dd I had with a raster layer set to "floating" and 5000m offset.  It ends up set to "on the ground" with a 5000m cartographic offset, which does result in equivalent rendering to ArcGlobe. Maybe we can work this one the opposite way.... Can you provide a repro case (a 3dd) for which there does not exist equivalent conversion in Pro? If needed I can provide ad-hoc FTP for you to transfer it, if it's too big to post as an attachment here. J ... View more