Latest Contributions by KimberlyGarbade

Looks like Model 4 did not validate.  That probably indicates an error in Model 4.  I'm guessing the OUTPUT LAYER parameter from Iterate Layers in Model 4 should not be used as input into the Feature Class To Shapefile tool.  Rather the output of the Select Layer By Location tool should feed the Feature Class to Shapefile tool in Model 4.  Something like this: Also, I agree with @RhettZufelt.  I don't see why two models are necessary.  You can add the attributes to the shapefiles as they are created, but if you do want to create the shapefiles first and add the fields later you will need 2 models (since their is a limit of one iterator per model as you know).... To use two model try making Model 4 a precondition of Model 3. ... View more

In the original post you mention "Now I'm trying to register the feature dataset as versioned and I'm encountering the attached error", but I don't see the attachment containing the error message. ... View more

I hope this helps. time.strftime("%y%m%d") ... View more

I have a model that will create a feature class containing one point for each polygon containing just the Maximum Area and the habitat for that area.  You should then be able to join this to your polygons using the polygons unique ID which is also an attribute of each point.  Please keep in mind I tested this in ArcMap 10.8.1 so not 10.3 My test data has different field names and only contains 2 polygons and 13 points.  Here are snapshot of the starting tables. MaxTestPoints: PolygonTest Using these two I did a spatial joint using points as the target to move the MyTestValue into the points.  The result I called MaxTestPoints_SpatialJoin2 Then I created a model that pulls just one point for each polygon from this feature class and appends it into a new feature class I called "MaxTestPointsFinal".  Each point in MaxTestPointsFinal is the point representing the Maximum value for a MyTestValue polygon.... confusing I know, but when you see the output below I think it will make more sense. The model is pretty simple.  The top image is just the model.  The images that follow that show important details about the steps: Iterator on polygon layer, value is the unique ID of the polygon Select by attribute (gets all records that share max value) Select by Attribute (with Remove_From_Selection option) to exclude all points that do not fall within the polygon being considered. The append step just appends the identified point to a feature class of all Max value points. There might be a MUCH easier way, but given the constraints of file GDB in ArcMap 10.3 I sure couldn't think of it. Hope this helps. K ... View more

Hmmmm.... finding Max in a file geodatabase seems harder than it should be.  Database views are not supported in File GDBs and subqueries on file and personal geodatabases don't seem to support GROUP BY and Summarize cannot tell you which habitat has the Max Area.  I am seeing your problem.  Looks like Model Builder might be the answer if this is a process you have to repeat frequently.  Is this a one time process or will you have to repeat it often? ... View more

Sorry, just getting back....Quick questions. Is your data in a file geodatabase or an Enterprise GDB (I.E. SQL Server, Post GRE, Oracle, etc.)? ... View more

I don't have 10.3 to test against, but if you spatial join the points with the polygons to move the cell IDs to the points first (points are the target). Then use a database of query to select the point within each cell that has the highest value for Area (Max query). Then export those points to a new feature class, and then run the spatial join with the GridCells as the target against just the Max value points. This might work without python or a model builder model   ... View more

Is the second computer set up exactly like the first in terms of ArcMap version and extensions installed, .NET version, required run times, SQL drivers, etc.?  You might also check that your using the same database permissions between the two test environments.   ... View more

I don't think you can do it directly.  But of course I might be wrong, lets hope someone else knows a way. Of course you can if you load the data from the file GDB into a SQL Server Enterprise GDB, but if you don't have the level of GIS software that allows you to do that you could try one more thing.  If you can create a personal geodatabase and copy the data into that, that format is an MS Access file type.   That you can either open directly in Access or bring it into SSMS. ... View more

Sorry for the short lived post, but I solved it.... I was using incorrect syntax.  The syntax should have been: arcpy.management.CalculateField(fc,'Notes','SentenceCase.subsmade(!Notes!)','PYTHON3', 'import SentenceCase')   ... View more

Sorry, was out for a while.  All of the methods I have suggested only update your symbology classes.  Each class can be defined to have a certain style (I.E. "2 pnt Blue Dashed Line"), but these styles have to be set by hand for each class (unless you want to dig into customization through code).  Since "Yes" and "No" are not symbol classes on their own (I.E. you want "Culvert - No" and "Dam - No" to be symbolized differently) I think the best answer is to define the styles for your symbol classes as you started doing initially.  If you define "Culvert - Yes" to be one symbol you can replicate that symbol for "Culvert - No" and change its color slightly to distinguish it from the affirmative.  Once all the classes have been defined you should be able to "Review" your line features at will and the line symbology will update as you go.  The symbol classes will be saved with your project and should not change again. You could also use the "add the same layer to your map twice" method to keep the Dam, Culvert, etc. lines symbolized consistently in one version and then change the second version of the same layer to change symbol color as review progresses (I.E. from Review changes from "No" to "Yes"). ... View more