|
POST
|
Thank you Amanda, We've reproduced this locally and logged an issue for it: BUG-000142306. Craig
... View more
08-18-2021
03:53 PM
|
1
|
3
|
1340
|
|
POST
|
We've seen an issue in the past where selection would freeze if map tips were enabled for any other layers on the map. We're working on a fix for this issue, but turning map tips off will help in the meantime.
... View more
08-11-2021
10:25 AM
|
2
|
1
|
7678
|
|
POST
|
You also don't need to convert labels to annotation to benefit from the reference scale. You can just set one in the map itself.
... View more
08-10-2021
10:53 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1287
|
|
IDEA
|
You can put the values into an array and then use the Distinct function for this. This will work with numbers or text in an array, for example: Distinct(["1", "2", "2", "2", "3", "3", "4"]) or Distinct([1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4]) The Split function can help you construct an Array if you don't have one already.
... View more
02-18-2021
06:42 PM
|
0
|
0
|
12043
|
|
IDEA
|
We had smooth and simplify effects in ArcMap geometric effects with Representations. We didn't bring these forward in ArcGIS Pro because they were not used often due to problematic results. Why?: Effects are applied on a feature by feature basis and while smooth or simplify may work fine for a single isolated feature, they can quickly introduce conflicts and overlaps when applied individually to many close features. The smooth and simplify geoprocessing tools handle these cases by considering topological conflicts and handling cases like coincident edges. We'd be interested in hearing out cases where you still feel this functionality would be valuable given the explanation above.
... View more
01-15-2021
04:47 PM
|
0
|
0
|
2328
|
|
POST
|
Line offset exists in the specification but the ArcGIS JavaScript API and therefore the ArcGIS Online map viewer doesn't support it at this time. It's on our list to add in a future release where we want to ensure 1) excellent performance and 2) handling of complex geometries.
... View more
10-02-2020
05:50 PM
|
0
|
1
|
2890
|
|
POST
|
Unfortunately these are a few cases where this string has been embedded within the source list of the service itself. For some Esri services, we will be looking at the possibility of removing these. In the meantime, unfortunately the only workaround is to create a text element with the sources without this string and put the real service layer credits off the page.
... View more
06-29-2020
11:35 AM
|
0
|
0
|
1204
|
|
POST
|
Interesting, that's not what the field delimiter was designed for! Backstory: In ArcMap when creating unique value symbology from many fields, we typically store "<value 1>,<value2>" etc with each value being separated by a comma. This approach worked for many cases, but went horribly wrong when the unique value from a field actually contained a comma. We added analysis code to detect this when generating unique values and would switch the separator to another character. The UI under Advanced was just there to provide an annotation place to edit it. In ArcGIS Pro, we don't store unique values for the comma delimited case in a single string with a separator. We store an array of values. Therefore, we don't need the delimiter for the above purpose. Obviously you can hand edit the labels for the classes to not be commas, but I can imagine that would be time consuming as you note. It appears the sort is primarily an issue for 1-9 and then things are ok after that, so maybe re-ordering just those won't be too bad. Looks like we have a few things to look into including the sort.
... View more
01-23-2020
05:00 PM
|
1
|
1
|
6363
|
|
POST
|
Maps are not fully loaded until they're viewed. So, an open map view will be loaded but a hidden map view will not be loaded until it is made visible. Maps that are not open are not fully loaded, but some aspects of them are read. We've tested permutations up to thousands of maps and performance varies depending on content and disk speed. I'd say a more realistic scenario being targeted is a dozen or so maps. At the 2.5 release of ArcGIS Pro, due out next year, improvements to map loading / unloading have been made to have less in memory when a map is closed etc.
... View more
11-21-2019
01:20 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1789
|
|
POST
|
Is there any chance you can share code or a small example case? Is it Apache POI you're using?
... View more
11-19-2019
02:10 PM
|
0
|
0
|
1541
|
|
POST
|
What exact issues are you seeing with either scenario and which Java version does your build target?
... View more
11-19-2019
01:37 PM
|
0
|
2
|
1541
|
|
POST
|
This case you're showing in the UI is Vary symbology by color—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS Desktop which is for linking data values to a color not color values to a color. See Attribute-driven color in symbology—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS Desktop for color to color.
... View more
08-21-2019
01:23 PM
|
1
|
0
|
4760
|
|
POST
|
This is achievable as well using the attribute driven color approach. What issues are you having?
... View more
08-21-2019
01:22 PM
|
0
|
0
|
8629
|
|
POST
|
The text out of the expression needs to match the examples in the above linked help topic. If you're specifying alpha, you need a value from 0 to 1 with 0 being fully transparent and 1 being opaque. You also don't need the concatenate function in this case So, use: "rgb(" + $feature['Units_in_M$.R'] + "," + $feature['Units_in_M$.G'] + "," + $feature['Units_in_M$.B'] -or- "rgba(" + $feature['Units_in_M$.R'] + "," + $feature['Units_in_M$.G'] + "," + $feature['Units_in_M$.B'] + ",1)" Depending on what you're fields are, you may need to use the Arcade Text() function to format numbers to correct format as a string.
... View more
08-21-2019
01:19 PM
|
1
|
0
|
1550
|
|
IDEA
|
We've been focusing on documenting the JSON variation of this spec (see https://github.com/Esri/cim-spec). We've had requests to have a JSON schema version of this which we're considering, but no plans to do an XML schema at this point. mapx, lyrx, pagx, and items in styles all use the JSON spec.
... View more
07-25-2019
02:23 PM
|
1
|
1
|
3166
|
| Title | Kudos | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 07-22-2024 10:03 AM | |
| 1 | 02-12-2024 06:08 PM | |
| 3 | 03-28-2023 02:09 PM | |
| 43 | 06-27-2022 12:44 PM | |
| 1 | 03-28-2022 10:25 AM |
| Online Status |
Offline
|
| Date Last Visited |
a week ago
|